UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Bruno Simmons

UCC Article 9 Priority Rules - Lost Equipment Loan to Junior Lender After Perfection Mix-up

This is eating at me and I need to understand what went wrong. Had a $180K equipment financing deal that should have been bulletproof - we filed our UCC-1 first, debtor name was spot-on, collateral description covered all the machinery. But somehow a junior lender who filed 6 months AFTER us is claiming superior priority and threatening to seize the equipment. Their attorney is citing some UCC Article 9 priority rules that supposedly trump our earlier filing date. How is this even possible? I thought first-to-file always wins under the priority rules. The debtor is in default and now we're looking at a total loss because this other lender says they have a superpriority claim. Can someone explain how UCC Article 9 priority rules actually work? I'm clearly missing something fundamental here because this makes no sense.

Sorry this happened to you. UCC Article 9 priority rules can be brutal when you don't see them coming. At least you'll know to watch for PMSI issues on future deals.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

Thanks. Definitely learned my lesson about assuming first-to-file means first-in-right under these priority rules.

0 coins

Freya Ross

•

One more thing to check - make sure their UCC-1 actually describes the equipment correctly for PMSI priority. UCC Article 9 priority rules require the collateral description to be specific enough to identify the purchase money collateral.

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

Yeah, sounds like they knew exactly what they were doing with the PMSI priority claim.

0 coins

Sergio Neal

•

Professional equipment lenders usually know UCC Article 9 priority rules inside and out. They have to in order to protect their interests.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

Ohio UCC code requirements for debtor name variations - need guidance

Running into some confusion with Ohio UCC code specifics regarding debtor name formatting. We've got a commercial loan where the borrower's legal name on their articles of incorporation shows as 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but their EIN documentation and bank accounts all show 'Advanced Mfg Solutions LLC' (no comma, abbreviated). Filed our UCC-1 using the exact articles name but now we're second-guessing if Ohio follows the 'seriously misleading' standard differently than other states. The collateral is pretty substantial equipment financing so we can't afford to have a defective filing. Anyone dealt with Ohio's specific interpretation of the UCC code for entity name variations? Our internal compliance is pushing for an amendment but I want to make sure we're not overthinking this.

Brian Downey

•

For what it's worth, I've never seen an Ohio filing get challenged over 'Manufacturing' vs 'Mfg' type abbreviations. The comma thing is more of a wild card but even that rarely causes real problems in practice.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

That's helpful context. Sounds like Ohio is pretty reasonable about common business abbreviations.

0 coins

Jacinda Yu

•

Most states are getting better about this stuff. The old days of hyper-technical rejections seem to be fading.

0 coins

Update us on what you decide? Always helpful to hear how these situations get resolved for future reference.

0 coins

Callum Savage

•

Smart to get legal sign-off. Better to have everyone comfortable with the decision.

0 coins

Jean Claude

•

And if you do end up running those documents through a verification tool, curious to hear what it flags. Always learning something new from these edge cases.

0 coins

Freya Pedersen

UCC search nightmare - system keeps timing out during debtor lookups

Has anyone else been having major issues with UCC search functionality lately? I'm trying to run comprehensive debtor searches for a portfolio review and the system keeps crashing on me. Started this morning with what should have been a routine search of about 15 debtors across different filing offices, but I'm getting timeouts on searches that used to take seconds. The search interface loads fine but then hangs when I submit the debtor name query. I've tried different browsers, cleared cache, even tried from a different network connection. This is holding up a critical lien audit that needs to be completed by end of week. The search results are essential for verifying existing UCC-1 filings and checking for any amendments or continuations I might have missed. Anyone found workarounds for when the search portal is acting up like this?

For future reference, I keep a log of when the search portal has issues. Noticed it's usually worst between 10AM-2PM on weekdays. Planning searches outside those windows has helped a lot with reliability.

0 coins

That's really helpful data. I wonder if they do system maintenance during certain windows that affects performance.

0 coins

Could be maintenance related. I've noticed Friday afternoons are particularly bad, which might be scheduled maintenance prep.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Final update - managed to complete my portfolio review using a combination of off-peak searches and automated document verification. The Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier really helped fill in gaps where the manual searches were still failing. Caught two debtor name discrepancies that could have been problematic. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!

0 coins

Great outcome. The combination approach seems like the best strategy for these types of comprehensive reviews.

0 coins

Sofia Morales

•

Thanks for sharing the resolution. Will definitely keep the automated verification option in mind for my next big audit.

0 coins

Samantha Howard

Loan UCC filing got rejected - debtor name mismatch with business registration

Our bank submitted a UCC-1 for a $340K equipment loan last week and it got kicked back by the SOS office. The rejection notice says "debtor name does not match registered business entity." The loan documents show the borrower as "Precision Manufacturing LLC" but apparently their state registration is under "Precision Manufacturing, LLC" with that extra comma. This is a standard SBA-backed equipment financing deal and we need this lien perfected ASAP. The loan has already funded and our compliance officer is freaking out about the perfection gap. Has anyone dealt with this exact comma issue before? Do we need to amend the loan docs or just refile the UCC with the exact registered name? Really don't want to delay this any further since we're already 10 days out from funding.

Justin Chang

•

For what it's worth, this comma thing is incredibly common. The state systems can't distinguish between intentional punctuation and typos so they reject anything that doesn't match exactly. Once you refile with the correct name it should process without any issues.

0 coins

Thanks for the reassurance! I was worried there might be some deeper issue with the filing.

0 coins

Nah, punctuation mismatches are usually the easiest fixes. Way better than having collateral description problems.

0 coins

Grace Thomas

•

UPDATE: Just wanted to follow up - refiled the UCC-1 with the exact registered name including the comma and it was accepted within 4 hours! Thanks everyone for the quick help. Definitely going to start using that document verification tool someone mentioned to catch these issues upfront.

0 coins

Great to hear! The verification tool will definitely save you time on future filings.

0 coins

Elijah Knight

•

Perfect timing too - got it resolved well before the weekend. Your compliance team must be relieved!

0 coins

The Boss

UCC lien search Idaho - debtor name variations causing missed results?

Running into issues with our UCC lien search Idaho process and wondering if others have dealt with this. We're doing due diligence on a potential acquisition and keep finding discrepancies when searching the same debtor under slightly different name formats. For example, searching 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' versus 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma) returns different results in the Idaho SOS database. Same thing happens with 'John D Smith' versus 'John David Smith'. This is creating gaps in our lien searches that could be problematic for the transaction. Has anyone found a reliable method for ensuring comprehensive UCC lien search coverage when debtor names might be recorded with variations? We're particularly concerned about missing active liens that could affect the deal structure.

Rachel Clark

•

For what it's worth, this issue isn't unique to Idaho. We see similar problems in several states that require exact name matches. The key is having a systematic approach to generate all possible name variations before you start searching.

0 coins

Which other states have you found to be particularly problematic for name matching?

0 coins

Mia Alvarez

•

Any chance you could share your systematic approach? We're always looking to improve our search protocols.

0 coins

Carter Holmes

•

Bottom line - budget extra time for UCC searches in Idaho and states with similar exact-match requirements. Better to spend a few extra hours on comprehensive searching than to miss a critical lien that derails your transaction.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

Absolutely agree. The cost of thorough searching is always less than the cost of missing something important.

0 coins

We learned this lesson the hard way. Now UCC searches are a separate line item in our due diligence budget with adequate time allocated.

0 coins

Prev1...605606607608609...684Next