Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Nia Williams
Update on this - I ended up calling Tennessee SOS and they confirmed the comma version is correct in their system. Apparently when the LLC was registered the attorney included the comma and that's what stuck. Filed this morning with the comma version and it went through immediately.
So the lesson is always call when in doubt? Good to know their office is responsive.
Perfect timing - I was just about to call them myself. Glad it worked out and thanks for sharing the resolution!
I've been filing UCCs in Tennessee for 15 years and this comma issue comes up regularly. The state really needs to improve their search function to show all variations of entity names, not just exact matches. It would save everyone a lot of headaches.
At least Tennessee processes rejections quickly so you don't waste weeks waiting to find out there's a problem.
True, their turnaround time is pretty good. Just wish the front-end was more user-friendly.
Join the conversation
Quick question - are you sure the entity is still active? I've seen cases where companies with foreign names let their corporate status lapse, which can affect UCC filing validity.
Always worth checking. Entity status can change quickly, especially with companies that have complex ownership structures.
StarStrider
•This is why I run entity searches right before filing, not just when I start the process. Things change fast in corporate world.
Ravi Gupta
Just to circle back on your original question - I'd recommend getting the exact debtor name from the Delaware Division of Corporations database search. That will show you exactly how they handle the transliteration, and that's what you should use on your UCC-1. If you're still unsure, the document verification approach others mentioned could give you peace of mind before filing.
Dmitry Popov
•Perfect. I'll do the Delaware search first, then use the verification tool to double-check everything before submitting. Thanks everyone for all the helpful advice!
Ravi Gupta
•You're welcome. Let us know how it goes - these international name cases are always good learning experiences for the community.
Join the conversation
This is exactly why I always file UCC-1s at least a week before closing. These online systems are so unreliable. But since you're in a time crunch, definitely call their office first thing tomorrow morning.
Yeah lesson learned for next time. This deal came together super fast so I didn't have much choice on timing.
Happens to the best of us. The important thing is getting it filed before your deadline.
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Texas and want to know what works.
Will do! Hopefully I'll have good news by tomorrow afternoon.
Amara Torres
•Yeah please update. These portal issues seem to be getting worse everywhere.
Join the conversation
Just went through this exact scenario two weeks ago! The problem was that our UCC-1 got filed under a slightly different version of the company name due to character limits in their system. The filed document showed the correct full name, but the searchable index used a truncated version. Only way I found it was by searching the filing date range and scrolling through results.
Sean Doyle
•That's super helpful! What was the character limit that caused the truncation?
I think it was around 50 characters for the indexed name field, but the actual filing can contain the full name. Really frustrating system design.
Update us when you figure this out! I'm dealing with a similar California UCC search issue and curious what the solution ends up being.
Sean Doyle
•Will do! Going to try the entity name lookup first, then the wildcard search, and if that doesn't work I'll call the SOS office directly.
Dylan Cooper
•Following this thread too. California's UCC system definitely has some quirks that aren't well documented.
GalaxyGazer
Update for anyone following this thread - I figured out the confusion. The rejection notice wasn't actually citing UCC 1-308 as the reason for rejection. It was part of an informational section explaining various UCC provisions, and 'significado' was just clarifying what that section means. The actual rejection was for a debtor name mismatch like everyone suspected. Thanks for all the help sorting this out!
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•This is why I always triple check debtor names before submitting. One character off and you're back to square one.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•Perfect example of why the automated document checking is so valuable. Would have caught that name issue before submission.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
For future reference, the main UCC sections that actually matter for financing statement filings are in Article 9. Section 9-502 for sufficiency requirements, 9-503 for debtor names, 9-504 for secured party names, 9-108 for collateral descriptions. Those are the ones that'll actually cause rejections if you mess them up. UCC 1-308 is more about contract performance and rights preservation.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
•Article 9 is definitely where all the action is for secured transactions. Good to know the specific sections.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•This whole thread has been educational. Love when forum discussions actually teach you something useful.
0 coins