


Ask the community...
I went through something very similar with Treasury bonds last year. One thing that helped me was understanding that the $675 accrued market discount on your 1099-B is essentially the taxable portion of your $1,000 total gain ($13,000 - $12,000). The difference between your total gain and the reported market discount likely accounts for the accrued interest and any other adjustments your broker made. When you enter this in your tax software, you'll report the $675 as ordinary income (not capital gains) and it gets added to your regular income. Combined with your $65 interest from the 1099-INT, you're looking at about $740 in additional taxable income from this bond. The key thing to remember is that even though your 1099-B shows no capital gain/loss, the IRS still wants their cut of the "built-in gain" you received by buying the bond at a discount. It's counterintuitive but that's how the tax code works for market discount bonds.
This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I was looking for! So the $675 market discount is basically the IRS saying "you got a $1,000 benefit from buying this bond at a discount, but we're only going to tax you on $675 of it as ordinary income." The remaining $325 difference probably includes adjustments for the accrued interest that was already building up in the bond's price when I bought it. It's definitely counterintuitive that Cost Basis = Proceeds shows no capital gain but I still owe taxes on the market discount. I guess the IRS wants to make sure they get their share of the "discount arbitrage" even though it looks like a wash on the surface. Thanks for breaking it down in such simple terms!
Just to add another perspective on this - I had a similar bond situation last year and made the mistake of trying to handle it myself initially. The tax software questions about market discount elections are confusing because they're asking about a choice most individual investors never make. Here's what I learned: When your 1099-B shows "Accrued Market Discount," that's money you need to report as ordinary income (taxed at your regular rates, not capital gains rates). The reason your Cost Basis equals Proceeds is because your broker already adjusted your basis to account for the market discount - but you still owe taxes on that discount amount. Think of it this way: You bought a $13,000 bond for $12,000. The IRS considers $675 of that $1,000 difference as taxable income that you earned by holding the bond. Even though you didn't receive a separate payment for it, it's built into the redemption value. So yes, you'll be taxed on $740 total ($675 market discount + $65 interest). Make sure when your tax software asks about including the market discount in current year income, you select "yes" - that's the normal treatment for most people who haven't made special elections about annual amortization.
This is incredibly helpful! I've been staring at my tax software for hours trying to figure out what to do with the market discount question. Your explanation about the broker already adjusting the cost basis makes so much sense - that's why it shows equal proceeds and basis even though I clearly made money on the bond. I was worried I might be double-reporting income somehow, but now I understand that the $675 market discount is separate from any capital gains calculation. It's just treated as regular income that I earned by buying the bond at a discount and holding it to maturity. One quick follow-up - when I report this $675 as ordinary income, does it go on Schedule B with my other interest income, or does it get reported somewhere else? My tax software has been asking about "election to include market discount in gross income" and I want to make sure I'm putting it in the right place.
The market discount should be reported as ordinary income on Schedule B along with your other interest income. When your tax software asks about "election to include market discount in gross income," you should select yes - this is the standard treatment for market discount unless you've previously made a special election to amortize it annually (which most individual investors haven't done). The $675 will get added to your other interest income on Schedule B, Line 1, and then flow through to your Form 1040. It's treated exactly like interest income for tax purposes, even though it represents the gain from buying the bond at a discount. So your Schedule B will show the $65 from your 1099-INT plus the $675 market discount, totaling $740 in taxable interest income from this bond transaction. The software should handle the reporting automatically once you answer "yes" to including the market discount in current year income.
Something to consider - you might also want to look at tax-loss harvesting before year-end to potentially lower your MAGI. If you have any investments with unrealized losses, selling them could offset some of your gains and potentially get you under the threshold.
Just to add another perspective - if you're really close to the income limits, you might also want to consider maximizing your 401(k) contributions if you haven't already. Traditional 401(k) contributions reduce your AGI (and therefore your MAGI), which could potentially bring you back under the Roth IRA phase-out range. For 2025, you can contribute up to $23,500 to a 401(k) ($31,000 if you're 50 or older). Even if you can't max it out completely, every dollar you contribute reduces your MAGI dollar-for-dollar. This strategy works especially well if your employer offers matching contributions too.
This is such a great point! I completely overlooked the 401(k) strategy. With $130k salary plus $40k gains putting me at $170k MAGI, if I could max out my 401(k) at $23,500, that would bring me down to around $146,500 - right at the beginning of the phase-out range! That means I could still make at least a partial Roth contribution. Do you know if there's a deadline for increasing 401(k) contributions for this year, or can I adjust it anytime through my employer?
FYI - If you drive primarily for 1099 work, you might want to keep a dedicated credit card JUST for vehicle expenses. That's what I do for my DoorDash work - everything car-related goes on one card, which makes it super easy to calculate percentages for business use vs personal use at tax time.
Smart idea! Do you still need to track miles if you do this, or can you just use the credit card statements as proof?
You still technically need to track the business-use percentage of your vehicle regardless of how you pay for expenses. The credit card just helps organize your actual expenses. If you're using the actual expense method (not the standard mileage rate), the IRS requires you to determine what percentage of your vehicle's use was for business. So you'd need some form of mileage log showing total miles driven and business miles driven to calculate that percentage. Then you'd apply that percentage to your total vehicle expenses (from your dedicated credit card) to determine your deduction.
Just want to add another perspective here - I'm a tax preparer and see this situation constantly with gig workers. The good news is you're not completely out of luck, but you do need to be strategic about how you approach this. First, DON'T just estimate or guess at your mileage without any supporting documentation. That's asking for trouble if you get audited. The IRS expects "adequate records" which means some form of contemporaneous tracking OR a reasonable reconstruction method with supporting evidence. Your delivery apps are your best friend here. Most platforms (DoorDash, UberEats, etc.) keep detailed trip histories that include pickup/dropoff locations and timestamps. Download all of this data ASAP - some platforms only keep it for a limited time. You can use mapping tools to calculate the actual mileage between locations and build a defensible log. For your $4,300 in gas receipts - these could still be valuable if you choose the actual expense method, but you'll need to determine your business use percentage. Without proper records, this becomes much harder to defend. Consider consulting with a tax professional before filing. The potential deduction savings (likely several thousand dollars) usually justify the cost of getting expert guidance on your specific situation.
This is incredibly helpful advice! I'm actually in almost the exact same situation as the original poster - been doing gig work for about 6 months and only kept gas receipts without tracking miles. Reading through all these responses has been eye-opening. Quick question - when you mention downloading trip histories from the delivery apps, do most of them show the exact route taken or just the pickup/dropoff points? I'm wondering if I need to account for the route I actually drove vs. the direct distance between points, especially since I sometimes make multiple stops or take different routes due to traffic. Also, how far back do platforms typically keep this data? I'm worried some of my earlier months might not be available anymore.
I'm curious about the timeline here...when did you file your original return and how long do you typically have to amend? My tax guy always says "don't worry about small stuff" but reading these comments has me wondering if that's good advice.
Generally you have 3 years from the original filing deadline to amend a return. So for 2024 taxes that were due in April 2025, you'd have until April 2028. But I wouldn't wait that long - the IRS computers usually catch missing W-2s within 6-18 months and they'll send you a notice with penalties and interest by then.
I went through this exact same situation a couple years ago with a part-time retail job I'd forgotten about. The amount was similar to yours - around $1,100. I was tempted to just ignore it since it seemed so small, but I'm really glad I didn't. Here's what I learned: the IRS matching system is pretty sophisticated. They get copies of all W-2s and 1099s, and their computers automatically flag when reported income doesn't match what employers submitted. You'll likely get a CP2000 notice in 12-18 months asking about the discrepancy, and by then you'll owe penalties and interest on top of the additional tax. Filing the 1040-X now while it's still voluntary shows good faith and typically results in minimal or no penalties. Plus, if they withheld any federal taxes from your paychecks (which many part-time jobs do), you might actually end up with a small additional refund rather than owing money. The amended return process isn't as scary as it sounds - just recalculate your tax with the additional income included and submit the form. Much better to handle it proactively than wait for the IRS to find it themselves!
LilMama23
Just wanted to add another perspective on installment sales since Malik brought it up - they can be incredibly effective for business sales, but there are some important considerations to keep in mind. Most business assets can qualify for installment sale treatment, but there's a key exception: inventory and depreciation recapture on personal property (like your laundry equipment) generally cannot use installment treatment. This means the depreciation recapture portion would still hit you in year one, even with an installment sale structure. However, the portion of your sale allocated to goodwill, customer relationships, and other intangible assets CAN qualify for installment treatment. So you'd still get some benefit from spreading those gains over multiple years. The buyer would need to agree to seller financing for a true installment sale. Alternatively, if they want to pay cash upfront, you could potentially structure it as a sale to a buyer who then immediately sells to the actual purchaser with seller financing - though this gets complicated and you'd definitely need legal and tax counsel. Another option to consider is a charitable remainder trust if you're charitably inclined. You can transfer the business to the trust, get a partial tax deduction, receive income for life, and potentially reduce the overall tax bite significantly. Not right for everyone, but worth exploring given the size of your transaction.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
ā¢This is really helpful clarification about installment sales! I didn't realize that depreciation recapture on equipment can't be deferred - that's a crucial detail that could have caught me off guard. So even with an installment sale, I'd still need to plan for paying the depreciation recapture taxes in year one. The charitable remainder trust option is intriguing, though I'm not sure how much I want to complicate things at this stage of my life. But it's good to know there are multiple strategies available beyond just a straight sale. Given all these complexities, it sounds like I really need to sit down with a specialist before I get too far into negotiations. The tax planning opportunities seem significant enough that getting expert help upfront could save me much more than the cost of the consultation. Thanks for breaking down these different approaches - it's given me a lot to think about!
0 coins
Madison King
This is such a great discussion! As someone who recently went through a similar business sale, I wanted to add one more consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet. Make sure you understand the difference between asset sales vs. stock sales, as this can significantly impact your tax treatment. Most small business sales (especially laundromats) are structured as asset sales, which is what everyone has been discussing here with the depreciation recapture. However, if your business is incorporated and you can structure it as a stock sale instead, you might get more favorable capital gains treatment on the entire transaction. The downside is that buyers often prefer asset sales because they can "step up" the basis of assets for their own depreciation purposes. Also, don't forget about state tax implications! Some states have no capital gains tax, while others tax capital gains as ordinary income. Depending on where you're located, this could be another significant factor in your planning. Given the complexity everyone has outlined here - depreciation recapture, asset allocation, installment sales, appraisals - I'd strongly recommend getting multiple opinions from tax professionals who specialize in business sales. The potential savings from proper planning on a $300k transaction could easily justify the cost of expert advice. Best of luck with your sale and retirement! 25 years running a business is quite an accomplishment.
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
ā¢Thank you for bringing up the asset vs. stock sale distinction! That's a really important point that could make a huge difference in the overall tax outcome. I'm pretty sure my laundromat is set up as a sole proprietorship (I've been filing Schedule C for years), so I think I'm locked into an asset sale structure. But it's definitely worth confirming with my accountant whether there are any options to restructure before the sale. The state tax angle is something I hadn't considered at all - that could be another significant factor depending on my location. It's becoming clear that there are way more variables in play than I initially realized. You're absolutely right about getting multiple opinions from specialists. Given all the strategies mentioned in this thread (professional appraisals, installment sales, asset allocation planning, etc.), the potential tax savings could be enormous. Even if specialist consultations cost a few thousand dollars, that could easily pay for itself many times over on a transaction this size. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion - you've given me a much better understanding of what I need to focus on as I move forward with the sale. This community has been incredibly helpful!
0 coins