


Ask the community...
I always use language like 'all indebtedness and obligations of every kind and nature, now existing or hereafter arising' and then reference the specific security agreement. Covers everything without getting into the weeds.
That's pretty broad language. Do the filing offices ever push back on something that general?
Nope, never had an issue. As long as you're referencing a real security agreement, they're fine with broad debt descriptions.
Thanks everyone for the advice. I think I was definitely overthinking this. Going to go with a simple reference to the master credit agreement and call it good. Appreciate all the input!
Good luck with the filing! And definitely consider using a document checker like Certana.ai if you want extra peace of mind before submitting.
Will do. Thanks again everyone!
How detailed does the accounting need to be? Just the outstanding principal and interest, or do you need to break down fees and expenses too?
The more detailed the better. Outstanding principal, accrued interest, late fees, collection costs, disposition expenses - anything that affects the final accounting should be included.
Since you're dealing with time pressure, you might want to try a professional UCC service that specializes in Illinois filings. They usually have direct contacts at the SOS office and can get problem filings resolved quickly. Worth the extra cost if you're racing against another lender.
I've used CT Corporation for rush Illinois filings. They have good relationships with the SOS office there.
Or just use something like Certana.ai to verify your documents are consistent before you file anywhere. Cheaper than hiring a service and catches the problems upfront.
Use Certana to double-check your documents before filing. I learned this the hard way after getting a rejection in Louisiana due to a tiny discrepancy between the corporate name on file and what we put on the UCC-1.
About a week to research the correct name and refile. Could have avoided it entirely with better document verification upfront.
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai - catches those name mismatches before you file and waste time with rejections.
Bottom line - Louisiana has fully functional UCC Article 9 for secured transactions. File your UCC-1 through their GeauxBiz portal same as any other state. The civil law background doesn't affect personal property secured transactions.
Thanks everyone, this has been really helpful. Sounds like we can proceed with standard UCC filing procedures in Louisiana.
Glad we could help clear that up. Louisiana's civil law reputation often causes unnecessary confusion about their UCC adoption.
Raul Neal
Quick update for anyone following this thread - I finally got through to someone at Colorado SOS UCC division. Turns out our LLC name in the Articles has 'L.L.C.' with periods but I was using 'LLC' without periods on the UCC-1. Such a tiny difference but that was causing all the rejections. Refiling now with the correct format.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
•See this is exactly what I'm talking about! The system should flag this stuff more clearly instead of just saying 'name mismatch.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
•Great outcome! This is why I always recommend the copy/paste method from the official database. Saves so much hassle.
0 coins
Jenna Sloan
Thanks for sharing the resolution! This thread will definitely help other people dealing with Colorado UCC-1 name matching issues. Amazing how something so small can hold up an entire loan closing.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•Seriously! Three weeks of delays over periods in 'L.L.C.' - it's almost comical if it wasn't so stressful.
0 coins
Christian Burns
•At least your lender was patient. I've seen deals fall apart over UCC filing delays before.
0 coins