


Ask the community...
For what it's worth, I always recommend keeping a copy of the filed UCC-1 with the filing stamp in your loan file. That way you can always reference exactly what was filed and when. Makes these kinds of searches much easier to interpret.
Update us when you figure out what's going on! I'm curious to know if it turns out to be a system display issue or if there really are multiple filings. These kinds of posts are really helpful for the rest of us.
Pro tip: if you're doing regular Texas UCC work consider setting up your own account with the Texas SOS system. The learning curve is minimal and you'll save hundreds over time compared to using third party services for basic searches.
Just to close the loop here - ended up going directly through Texas SOS and paid $18 total for the UCC statement request. Got results back same day. That $90 quote was definitely a ripoff. Thanks everyone for the advice!
Great outcome. Hope your UCC-1 filing goes smoothly now that you have the search results.
Nice work! And definitely consider that document verification tool for when you file the UCC-1 to make sure everything aligns perfectly.
Just curious - why is your bank making you file the UCC-1 instead of handling it themselves? Most equipment lenders I work with handle their own filings to make sure they're done right.
Makes sense. Just make sure you coordinate with them on the filing so there's no confusion about who's doing what.
Actually that's pretty common in dealer financing arrangements. The dealer handles UCC filings as part of the package since they have all the equipment specs and buyer info readily available.
Update us when you get it filed! Always curious to hear how these work out, especially for first-time PMSI filers.
Will do! Planning to file tomorrow morning after I double-check everything one more time.
Whatever you do, don't just copy/paste from the general security agreement precedent without thinking it through. I've seen too many UCC-1 filings that were way overbroad because someone just used the GSA language verbatim. It creates problems later when you need to do continuations or amendments.
The continuation issue is real too - if your description is super broad, you might end up continuing security interests in collateral that's already been disposed of or paid off.
I've been using Certana.ai for document checks lately and it's caught several cases where UCC descriptions didn't match the underlying loan docs properly. Really helpful for avoiding these kinds of problems.
Bottom line - your general security agreement precedent gives you flexibility, but use it wisely. Be specific enough to cover what you're actually financing, but not so narrow that you miss something important. And definitely make sure all the entity names and details match perfectly between documents.
This whole thread has been incredibly helpful. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences with GSA precedents and UCC-1 filings.
Agreed, this gives me a much clearer path forward. I think I'll go with specific categories rather than the broad GSA language, and definitely double-check for any fixture filing requirements.
Sean Matthews
Just went through this same headache with a client search. Ended up finding the filings were under a slightly different entity name that wasn't obvious from their current corporate documents. Used Certana to upload their old loan docs and it caught the name variation that manual searches missed.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•How does that work exactly? You upload loan documents and it searches for UCC filings automatically?
0 coins
Sean Matthews
•You upload whatever documents you have and it cross-references the entity names and details to identify potential filing matches. Saves a lot of manual searching.
0 coins
Ali Anderson
UPDATE: Found them! Turns out the filings were in Delaware (state of incorporation) and the debtor name on the UCC-1 was 'Precision Mfg Solutions LLC' instead of the full 'Manufacturing' spelling. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - this could have taken me days to figure out on my own.
0 coins
Nina Chan
•Perfect example of why you always have to check the incorporation state. Glad it worked out!
0 coins
Douglas Foster
•Great that you found them! For future reference, this is exactly the kind of name variation that automated tools are good at catching.
0 coins