UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Keep us posted on how this turns out! I'm dealing with some 2022 filings myself and this thread is really helpful. Hope you get it resolved before your client's closing.

0 coins

Will do! Thanks everyone for all the advice. I feel like I have a plan now instead of just panicking.

0 coins

That's what this community is for. We've all been there with filing issues at one point or another.

0 coins

One more thing to consider - make sure you check if your state has any special procedures for 2022 filing issues. Some states created specific processes to deal with the system problems from that year. Might save you some headaches.

0 coins

Yeah, some states were more proactive than others in addressing the issues. Worth checking what options are available.

0 coins

This is why I always recommend running filings through Certana first - helps avoid these kinds of problems before they happen.

0 coins

This is bringing back bad memories. Had a UCC-1 rejected in Nevada for 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' - apparently the Articles said 'Incorporated' but everywhere else we used 'Inc.' Cost us three days and almost lost the deal. Now I'm paranoid about every filing.

0 coins

Three days sounds about right for Nevada. Their system is efficient once you get the name right, but that initial rejection really kills your timeline.

0 coins

Exactly. And trying to explain to the client why their loan closing is delayed because of one word difference is not fun.

0 coins

UPDATE: Just wanted to circle back for anyone else dealing with this. I ended up using Certana.ai like a couple people suggested and it caught two more potential issues I would have missed - the address formatting was slightly different too. Refiled yesterday and got acceptance this morning. The tool literally saved my deal. Sometimes you just need that extra verification step to catch what your eyes miss.

0 coins

This is a great success story. I'm definitely going to start using document verification tools for my filings. Too much risk not to.

0 coins

Wait, this is the original poster - my profile number changed but yeah, wanted to update everyone. The loan closed on time and the lender was happy. Thanks to everyone who helped!

0 coins

UPDATE: Finally got it resolved! Turned out there was indeed an extra space in the company name that wasn't visible. Used one of those document verification tools someone mentioned (Certana.ai) and it immediately flagged the spacing issue. Filed this morning and got acceptance confirmation within 2 hours. Crisis averted!

0 coins

That's exactly what happened to me! Those document consistency tools are lifesavers for catching things like that.

0 coins

Great outcome! Secretary of state UCC systems really need better error messages to help people identify these formatting issues.

0 coins

This thread is gold! Bookmarking for future reference. Secretary of state UCC filings shouldn't be this complicated but at least now I know some troubleshooting strategies.

0 coins

Agreed, super helpful discussion. The document verification tip especially.

0 coins

Wish I had found this info during my three-day rejection nightmare last month!

0 coins

Quick question - when you file the UCC-3 amendment, make sure you're using the current version of the California form. They updated it last year and old versions get rejected automatically.

0 coins

Good catch. I'll download a fresh form from their website to be safe.

0 coins

Yeah, I got burned by that once. Spent days wondering why my filing kept getting rejected until I realized I was using an outdated form.

0 coins

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar name issue in California and want to see how the amendment approach works out.

0 coins

Good luck! California can be tricky but at least they're consistent about their pickiness.

0 coins

Let us know if you try that Certana verification thing too. Sounds like it could prevent these issues upfront.

0 coins

This thread is making me realize I probably haven't been thorough enough with my own UCC searches. Does anyone have a checklist or systematic approach they use to make sure they cover all the bases?

0 coins

That's helpful. I'm going to start being more systematic about this. Too much at stake to be casual about it.

0 coins

I've been using Certana.ai's document checker for this kind of verification. You upload your corporate docs and UCC search results and it automatically flags any name inconsistencies. Takes the guesswork out of the process.

0 coins

One more thing to consider - if you find active UCC filings, make sure to check their continuation status. West Virginia has specific timing requirements for UCC-3 continuations and some filings might have lapsed without proper continuation.

0 coins

Good catch. The filings I found are from 2020 so they should still be active, but I'll double-check the continuation requirements.

0 coins

UCC-1 filings are good for 5 years, so 2020 filings won't expire until 2025. But always worth verifying the exact filing dates and any continuation activity.

0 coins

Prev1...560561562563564...684Next