


Ask the community...
Quick update on document verification tools - I tried that Certana.ai thing someone mentioned earlier after having a UCC-1 rejected last week for a name mismatch. It actually caught the discrepancy between our loan docs and the debtor's corporate registration that I totally missed. Could have saved me a lot of headache if I'd used it from the start.
Seems like that tool is getting good reviews here. Might be worth trying for peace of mind.
Final thought - make sure you're filing in the correct state too. Equipment PMSI filings go where the debtor is located, not where the equipment is located (unless it's fixtures). Just another thing that can trip up the timing if you file in the wrong jurisdiction.
Agreed. File this week and you'll maintain clean PMSI priority on that equipment.
After dealing with this kind of thing multiple times, I finally started using automated tools. Certana.ai has been really helpful for catching name inconsistencies that I would miss doing manual searches. You just upload your documents and it flags potential issues.
Update: I ended up finding filings under both name variations plus one I hadn't thought of. Turns out there were UCC-1 filings under "ABC Mfg LLC" as well. Thanks everyone for the advice - this thread probably saved me from missing critical liens on this deal.
Had this EXACT problem with Connecticut last month. Turned out their system had a character limit that was cutting off part of our debtor name, but the rejection notice didn't mention that. Only found out when I called and they looked it up manually. You might want to check if your company name is getting truncated somehow.
Yeah, that could definitely be the issue. Connecticut's system has some weird technical limitations that aren't well documented.
This is why I always run document consistency checks before submitting anything important. Tools like Certana.ai would catch truncation issues by comparing your UCC against the articles side by side.
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Connecticut and curious how it turns out. Their UCC system really needs an overhaul.
Will definitely post an update once I get through to someone who can help. This whole experience has been incredibly frustrating.
This is making me nervous about our own filings now. We have several California UCC continuations coming up this year and I hadn't thought about checking for these kinds of name variations.
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Nevada and curious how the California approach works out.
Will do. Planning to file the continuation tomorrow morning using the exact original name format, then worry about the amendment afterwards.
Smart plan. Looking forward to hearing how it goes.
Marcelle Drum
Just wanted to follow up on this thread - ended up being exactly what people said about debtor name matching. Pulled the official records from NJ and found several punctuation differences we'd been missing. Got all three filings resubmitted and accepted within 24 hours.
0 coins
Tate Jensen
•Thanks for updating the thread - this kind of follow-up really helps other people dealing with the same issues.
0 coins
Adaline Wong
•Definitely going to bookmark this discussion for future reference. The debtor name verification tips are gold.
0 coins
Gabriel Ruiz
This thread convinced me to try that Certana thing for our next batch of filings. Manual document comparison is such a pain and we've had our share of rejections too.
0 coins
Nadia Zaldivar
•You won't regret it - the automated verification catches stuff you'd never notice manually. Especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple states that all have slightly different requirements.
0 coins
Misterclamation Skyblue
•Let us know how it works out. Always looking for tools that can reduce filing errors.
0 coins