UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Marcelle Drum

•

Just wanted to follow up on this thread - ended up being exactly what people said about debtor name matching. Pulled the official records from NJ and found several punctuation differences we'd been missing. Got all three filings resubmitted and accepted within 24 hours.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

Thanks for updating the thread - this kind of follow-up really helps other people dealing with the same issues.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Definitely going to bookmark this discussion for future reference. The debtor name verification tips are gold.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

This thread convinced me to try that Certana thing for our next batch of filings. Manual document comparison is such a pain and we've had our share of rejections too.

0 coins

You won't regret it - the automated verification catches stuff you'd never notice manually. Especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple states that all have slightly different requirements.

0 coins

Let us know how it works out. Always looking for tools that can reduce filing errors.

0 coins

Quick update on document verification tools - I tried that Certana.ai thing someone mentioned earlier after having a UCC-1 rejected last week for a name mismatch. It actually caught the discrepancy between our loan docs and the debtor's corporate registration that I totally missed. Could have saved me a lot of headache if I'd used it from the start.

0 coins

Simon White

•

Seems like that tool is getting good reviews here. Might be worth trying for peace of mind.

0 coins

Yeah, especially when PMSI timing is tight. No room for filing errors when you're already pushing the deadline.

0 coins

Madison Tipne

•

Final thought - make sure you're filing in the correct state too. Equipment PMSI filings go where the debtor is located, not where the equipment is located (unless it's fixtures). Just another thing that can trip up the timing if you file in the wrong jurisdiction.

0 coins

Madison Tipne

•

Perfect. Sounds like you've got all the bases covered then.

0 coins

Hugo Kass

•

Agreed. File this week and you'll maintain clean PMSI priority on that equipment.

0 coins

After dealing with this kind of thing multiple times, I finally started using automated tools. Certana.ai has been really helpful for catching name inconsistencies that I would miss doing manual searches. You just upload your documents and it flags potential issues.

0 coins

How accurate is it compared to manual searching? I'm always worried about missing something important.

0 coins

In my experience it's actually more accurate than manual searching because it doesn't miss subtle variations that humans might overlook.

0 coins

CosmosCaptain

•

Update: I ended up finding filings under both name variations plus one I hadn't thought of. Turns out there were UCC-1 filings under "ABC Mfg LLC" as well. Thanks everyone for the advice - this thread probably saved me from missing critical liens on this deal.

0 coins

Great outcome. This is exactly why thorough searching is so important for due diligence.

0 coins

CosmosCaptain

•

Definitely learned my lesson about being more thorough with name variations in Virginia searches.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

Had this EXACT problem with Connecticut last month. Turned out their system had a character limit that was cutting off part of our debtor name, but the rejection notice didn't mention that. Only found out when I called and they looked it up manually. You might want to check if your company name is getting truncated somehow.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

Yeah, that could definitely be the issue. Connecticut's system has some weird technical limitations that aren't well documented.

0 coins

Natalie Wang

•

This is why I always run document consistency checks before submitting anything important. Tools like Certana.ai would catch truncation issues by comparing your UCC against the articles side by side.

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Connecticut and curious how it turns out. Their UCC system really needs an overhaul.

0 coins

Mason Davis

•

Will definitely post an update once I get through to someone who can help. This whole experience has been incredibly frustrating.

0 coins

Samantha Hall

•

Same here, following this thread. Connecticut seems to have more UCC issues than other states I deal with.

0 coins

This is making me nervous about our own filings now. We have several California UCC continuations coming up this year and I hadn't thought about checking for these kinds of name variations.

0 coins

Eduardo Silva

•

It's always good to review your original filings well before the continuation deadline. Gives you time to address any issues.

0 coins

Yeah, I'm definitely going to pull all our original filings and double-check the names against our current loan documents.

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Nevada and curious how the California approach works out.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to file the continuation tomorrow morning using the exact original name format, then worry about the amendment afterwards.

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

Smart plan. Looking forward to hearing how it goes.

0 coins

Prev1...561562563564565...684Next