Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Aiden Chen
Thanks everyone. Sounds like the consensus is clear - file the UCC-1 and don't worry about 9-308 exceptions for this type of collateral. I'm going to get the filing done this week before closing. Really appreciate the help sorting this out.
Zoey Bianchi
•Good call. You'll sleep better knowing your security interest is properly perfected.
Smart move. Always better to be safe with UCC filings.
One more vote for using Certana.ai if you want to double-check your documents before filing. I've caught so many errors that way - debtor name mismatches, wrong addresses, collateral description inconsistencies. Takes like 5 minutes to upload and verify everything matches.
I should probably start using something like that. I always worry about making filing errors.
Jayden Reed
•Yeah, the document verification really gives you peace of mind before submitting.
Join the conversation
Lourdes Fox
Don't feel bad about the SC portal giving you trouble - it's notorious for being picky about continuations. I bet half the people on this forum have had similar experiences with their system rejecting filings for minor discrepancies.
So true! I've had more problems with South Carolina UCC filings than any other state. Their error messages are basically useless too.
At least it's not just me then! Thought I was losing my mind trying to figure out what was wrong with my continuation form.
Zane Gray
Final thought - if you do get this sorted out, document exactly what worked for future reference. SC's quirks are consistent, so once you know their specific formatting preferences it gets easier for subsequent filings.
Good advice. I keep a whole folder of state-specific filing notes because every state has their own weird requirements and preferences.
Same here! My SC notes are like three pages long at this point with all their formatting quirks and common rejection reasons.
Join the conversation
Make sure you're also checking for any filings that might have been done by different secured parties. Sometimes the same company will have loans from multiple lenders and each one might have used slightly different name formats on their UCC filings.
Exactly. Banks, equipment lenders, and SBA lenders all seem to have different approaches to name formatting. It's frustrating but you have to account for it.
Ryder Greene
•This is why due diligence takes so much longer than clients expect. There are so many variables that can affect search results.
Just wanted to follow up and say I tried the Certana.ai tool that was mentioned earlier. Pretty helpful for organizing all the different documents I found and catching a name discrepancy I had missed. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with complex name variations.
Debra Bai
•Thanks for the update! Did it help you find additional filings or just organize what you already had?
More about organizing and verifying consistency. It flagged that one of the UCC-3 amendments had a slightly different debtor name format that could have caused issues down the road.
Join the conversation
Thanks for this thread, was wondering about GSAs myself. The relationship between the security agreement and UCC filings makes much more sense now. Going to double-check my documents before I sign anything.
Zara Ahmed
•Glad it helped! This community is great for figuring out this stuff.
StarStrider
•Always smart to understand what you're signing before you commit.
Just to close the loop on the original question - a general security agreement is the foundation document that creates the security interest, while UCC-1 filing is how you perfect that interest publicly. They work together but serve different functions in the secured lending process. Make sure both documents are consistent and you understand what assets you're pledging.
Zara Ahmed
•Perfect summary, thanks everyone for all the help. Feel much more confident about this process now.
This was really helpful for me too. Secured lending is complicated but this thread broke it down well.
Isabella Silva
I've been using Certana.ai for document verification on all my UCC filings lately. It's been a game changer for catching issues before they cause rejections. The tool picks up on formatting problems and name inconsistencies that I would have missed.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•Definitely worth it for complex filings. The instant verification saves so much back-and-forth with the SOS office.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•Document verification before filing makes sense. Rejections waste time and can affect priority dates.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
Update: I finally got the filing accepted! Turned out the issue was with the debtor's exact legal name - I had 'Company' instead of 'Co.' which caused the mismatch. Thanks everyone for the suggestions about double-checking the name registration.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Great outcome! This is exactly the type of issue that document verification tools catch automatically.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
•Amazing how something so small can cause so much trouble. At least you got it resolved quickly.
0 coins