Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Update us when you figure it out! I have a SC filing coming up next week and want to avoid the same problem.
Will do! Planning to call them first thing Monday morning and get the exact name they have on file.
Daniel White
•Also consider running it through Certana.ai before your next attempt - might catch whatever discrepancy is causing the rejections.
Zane Gray
Had this exact same issue with a client's SC filing last year. Turned out the LLC had filed a name change amendment that wasn't reflected in the initial search results. Once I found the amended name and used that on the UCC-1, it went through fine. Good luck!
This is why I always request the complete entity file now. Saves so much time in the long run.
Same here. The $25 for complete filing history is way cheaper than multiple rejection fees and the stress.
Join the conversation
Check if your original UCC-1 filing number is showing correctly in their system. Sometimes the debtor name display issue is linked to broader database problems that affect the whole record.
Luis Johnson
•Filing number looks right, it's definitely just the name display that's off.
I deal with NJ UCC filings weekly and this comma issue comes up constantly. My advice: always file debtor names WITHOUT punctuation if possible. For your current situation, try filing the UCC-3 exactly as the name appears in the search results, not as you originally intended it.
You're right that's the catch-22. Legally correct vs. what the filing system will accept. Sometimes you have to choose practicality.
Luis Johnson
•This is exactly my dilemma. The legal name does have the comma according to the corporate registry.
Join the conversation
Dmitry Popov
I used that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier when we were doing due diligence on an acquisition. Really helpful for catching inconsistencies between the target company's corporate docs and UCC filings. Saved us from assuming some liens were properly perfected when they actually had debtor name issues.
That's exactly the kind of situation I want to avoid. Sounds like the document verification approach is worth trying.
Dmitry Popov
•Yeah, just upload the PDFs and it flags potential problems. Much easier than trying to manually compare everything, especially when you have multiple UCC-1 filings to review.
Ava Garcia
Update us on what you find when you check the official SOS records! Curious to know if it's actually filing errors or just credit report glitches.
Will do! Planning to pull the official UCC records this week and compare them with our current business registration. Hopefully it's just credit report inaccuracies.
StarSailor}
•Good luck! These debtor name issues can be stressful but they're usually fixable if you catch them early enough.
Join the conversation
Ethan Wilson
Quick question - does the debtor need to sign anything for a UCC-3 assignment in a security agreement sale? Or is this just between the old and new lenders?
Yuki Sato
•Just between the lenders typically. The debtor usually doesn't need to sign the UCC-3 assignment form.
Though you should probably notify the debtor that the security agreement sale happened and who the new secured party is.
Andre Dubois
For what it's worth, I've seen both approaches work (UCC-3 assignment vs new UCC-1) in security agreement sales. The assignment is usually preferred because it's simpler and maintains priority, but sometimes starting fresh makes sense if there are other issues to clean up. Sounds like in your case the assignment is the way to go.
Amina Toure
•Thanks everyone - this has been really helpful. Going to proceed with the UCC-3 assignment and make sure all the details match exactly.
CyberSamurai
•Smart choice. Keep us posted on how it goes!
Sofia Gomez
The trade name thing is probably your issue. NY requires you to include any assumed names or DBAs. Check the DOS business search to see if your debtor has any registered trade names.
0 coins
StormChaser
•This is so frustrating. Other states don't make you jump through these hoops.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Welcome to New York! Everything's more complicated here, even UCC filings.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
Try refiling with any trade names included in the debtor name field. Format would be "Legal Name LLC a/k/a Trade Name" if they have registered trade names. Also double-check that your collateral description is specific enough - NY doesn't like vague descriptions.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•There are tools for that now. I use Certana.ai to cross-check all my UCC docs against the charter docs before filing. Upload the PDFs and it flags any inconsistencies automatically.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•That actually sounds useful. Might save a lot of headaches with picky states like NY.
0 coins