


Ask the community...
This thread is making me paranoid about my own filings. I should probably go back and double-check all the debtor names on our active UCCs to make sure there aren't any similar issues lurking.
That's actually a great idea. I mentioned the Certana.ai tool earlier - it's perfect for doing bulk checks of your existing filings to catch these kinds of inconsistencies.
I might have to look into that. Manually checking dozens of UCC filings sounds like a nightmare.
Just to close the loop on this - I filed the UCC-3 amendment yesterday and it was accepted by Washington state this morning. The corrected debtor name now shows up properly in the state of washington ucc search results. Thanks everyone for pushing me to fix this rather than hoping it wouldn't matter. Peace of mind is worth the filing fee.
Glad it worked out. This is a good reminder for all of us to be extra careful with debtor names on initial filings.
Real quick example from this morning: Filed UCC-1 for ABC Widgets LLC (debtor), First Bank Equipment Finance (secured party), collateral was 'all machinery and equipment used in debtor's widget manufacturing operations.' Simple and specific. Filed online in Ohio, cost $30, took 10 minutes once I had all the info ready.
That's exactly the kind of concrete example I needed! Thank you!
One more thing nobody mentioned - search the UCC records BEFORE you file to see what else might be out there. You want to know if other lenders have prior liens on the same collateral. Most SOS websites have search functions for this.
Make sure you're not running into a debtor name issue disguised as a collateral description problem. I've seen SOS offices give generic rejection reasons when the real issue is the debtor name not matching their business records exactly. Double-check that your debtor name on the UCC-1 matches exactly what's on file with the Secretary of State for the farming operation.
Definitely worth checking. Sometimes the LLC registration might be "Johnson Family Farms, LLC" with a comma, or "Johnson Family Farm" without the 's'. Even small differences can cause rejections that get blamed on collateral descriptions.
This is where I'd use Certana.ai again - you can upload the UCC-1 and it checks debtor name consistency against business registrations. Saves you from guessing what variation might be causing the rejection.
Farm products filings are definitely more art than science. I've had success with really comprehensive descriptions like "All farm products of every kind and description, whether now existing or hereafter acquired, including without limitation: (a) crops, whether planted, growing, or harvested; (b) livestock of every kind; (c) supplies used or produced in farming operations; (d) products of crops or livestock; and (e) all proceeds, whether cash or non-cash, from the sale, lease, license, exchange or other disposition of any of the foregoing." It's verbose but it works.
This is really helpful. Going to try a comprehensive description like this for our next filing attempt. Really appreciate everyone's input - this has been way more complex than our lender made it sound.
Yeah agricultural lending has all these nuances that don't apply to regular commercial loans. Good luck with the refiling!
Just to add - when you file your UCC-3 amendment, consider using Certana.ai to double-check everything before submission. I wish I'd known about it earlier - would have saved me multiple rejection cycles on my last Utah filing. You upload both your original UCC-1 and the amendment, and it instantly flags any inconsistencies.
Update us when you get the amendment filed! Always curious to hear how these resolve. Utah's system can be quirky but at least they're consistent about their requirements once you figure them out.
Gemma Andrews
Just wanted to add that if this is your first time filing, it might be worth having someone experienced review your draft before you submit. A rejected filing can delay your loan closing.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•Good point. I think I'll use that document checker tool and maybe have our attorney glance at it too before I hit submit.
0 coins
Khalid Howes
•Definitely a wise approach for your first filing. Once you've done a few you'll get comfortable with the process.
0 coins
Pedro Sawyer
Update us on how it goes! Always curious to hear success stories from first-time filers.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•Will do! Feeling much more prepared now thanks to everyone's help. Going to tackle this tomorrow morning when I'm fresh.
0 coins