Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Yara Sabbagh
The bottom line is UCC records are the public filing system for security interests in personal property. If you have business loans secured by assets other than real estate, there are probably UCC filings against your company. They're public records, searchable by anyone, and they matter for credit decisions, M&A transactions, and bankruptcy proceedings.
Yara Sabbagh
•You're welcome. The key takeaway is they're a normal part of secured lending - nothing to be worried about as long as they're accurate and properly maintained.
Agreed. Just make sure you understand what's filed against your company and verify the information is correct. Knowledge is power in this area.
One last tip - when you're reviewing UCC filings, pay attention to the collateral description. Broad descriptions like 'all assets' or 'all personal property' mean the lender has a blanket lien on everything. More specific descriptions limit the lender's security interest to particular assets or categories of assets.
This is another area where Certana.ai helps - it can analyze collateral descriptions and flag overly broad or potentially problematic language in the filings.
NeonNova
•Collateral descriptions need to reasonably identify the property but don't have to be super-specific. 'Equipment' is usually sufficient, but 'stuff' probably wouldn't be.
Join the conversation
Had a similar issue last month and ended up using Certana.ai after someone here recommended it. Uploaded my debtor's Articles and my UCC-1 draft and it immediately flagged that I was missing a period after "Inc" - something I never would have caught manually. Filed with the corrected name and it went through first try.
Right? The automated checking caught it instantly. Much faster than playing guessing games with the state portal.
These filing systems are way too picky about punctuation. Makes the whole process unnecessarily stressful.
Update us when you get it figured out! I've got a NC filing coming up next week and this thread is giving me good tips on what to watch out for.
Good luck! The Friday deadline is tight but you've got some solid strategies to try now.
Mei Wong
•Definitely try the document verification approach too if the manual checking doesn't work out. Sometimes you need that automated cross-check to catch the subtle differences.
Join the conversation
Caesar Grant
Document preservation is crucial once you decide to enforce. Send preservation notices to the debtor and any known third parties who might have received assets. Creates legal obligations and helps in court if they continue hiding stuff.
Lena Schultz
•Should preservation notices go to family members too if there's suspicion of asset transfers?
Caesar Grant
•If you have reasonable basis to believe they received business assets, yes. But be careful not to overreach without evidence.
One more thing on kabbage ucc lien enforcement - make sure Kabbage didn't mess up the original UCC-1 filing. I've seen cases where their volume filing operation resulted in incorrect debtor names, wrong addresses, or inadequate collateral descriptions. All fixable with proper amendments but you need to identify issues first.
Mae Bennett
•Agreed. Volume lenders sometimes cut corners on filing accuracy.
TommyKapitz
•Good point. I'm going to do a thorough review of our filing before taking any enforcement action. Thanks everyone for the advice.
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I've seen courts be pretty reasonable about minor name discrepancies in lien validity disputes, especially if the name is substantially similar and there's no confusion about which entity is intended. But obviously it's better to get it right from the start.
Ally Tailer
•True but why risk it? UCC-3 amendments are cheap and easy to file.
Chris Elmeda
•Agreed, I'd rather spend the time fixing it now than worry about it later if there's ever a dispute.
One more tip - if you're going to standardize your loan and security agreement template, consider adding a field that requires the exact legal name to be inserted from the formation documents rather than having it pre-filled. That way you're forced to verify it for each deal.
Smart approach. Forces you to do the verification step every time instead of just assuming the template is correct.
Cass Green
•We actually did something similar - added a checklist requirement that formation docs must be reviewed before any UCC filing. Helps catch these issues early.
Liam Sullivan
Construction equipment repos are always messy. Even with perfect UCC-1 filings and clear 9-609(b)(2) rights, you're dealing with job site politics, potential mechanic's liens, and debtors who know the system. I'd budget for litigation costs from the start on these deals.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Sad but true. Equipment financing is risky enough without having to worry about repo complications.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•This is why proper documentation review upfront is so critical. Can't stress that enough.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
Update us on how this turns out! I'm in equipment financing too and these UCC 9-609(b)(2) situations always make me nervous. The law seems clear but the practical reality is usually much messier.
0 coins
Zara Mirza
•Will do. Meeting with attorney tomorrow and then we'll decide whether to pursue judicial repossession or try to negotiate a voluntary surrender.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Good luck! Voluntary surrender is usually the best outcome for everyone if you can make it work.
0 coins