


Ask the community...
I've worked with several non-profits on similar structures. One approach to consider is forming a separate for-profit entity that acquires the land, with investors who are looking for the tax benefits. The non-profit would then be granted specific rights to implement the regenerative agriculture projects. The key is making sure the conservation easement genuinely restricts development rights that have real value. If you're looking at agricultural land with legitimate development potential that you're permanently restricting, that can work. But if you're trying to inflate values artificially, you're heading for trouble.
Thanks for sharing this structure! I'm curious - how do you typically handle the ongoing relationship between the for-profit entity that holds the land and the non-profit doing the regenerative work? Is there a lease arrangement, or do you set up some kind of management agreement?
We typically use a long-term management agreement that gives the non-profit the right to implement their regenerative programs while the for-profit entity maintains ownership. This agreement needs to be established before the easement is placed, as it becomes part of the baseline documentation. For funding, we usually structure it so a portion of the tax benefit received by investors flows to the non-profit through a contractual arrangement. This provides ongoing operational funding beyond just the initial land access. Be careful though - the management fees must be reasonable and market-based, or the IRS might view the entire arrangement as a disguised donation scheme rather than a legitimate business structure.
Has anyone tried using partnership structures where investors get both tax benefits AND a share of agricultural revenue? We set up something similar for a client where they placed a conservation easement on 70% of the property, but kept 30% available for sustainable agricultural production. The investors got their tax deduction plus ongoing income from the farming operation.
If you're looking for a super simple solution and only have one 1099 to file, you could also check out the IRS's "FIRE" system for e-filing. It's not the most user-friendly interface, but it's direct from the IRS and doesn't require buying any special paper forms. You'll need to: 1. Apply for a Transmitter Control Code (TCC) from the IRS 2. Create your 1099-MISC file in the proper format 3. Upload it through the FIRE system The downside is that getting the TCC can take a bit of time. Might be easier to just use one of the third-party services others mentioned if you're in a hurry.
Is it too late to apply for a TCC for this filing season? We need to get this 1099 out pretty soon, and I'm worried about missing deadlines.
At this point in the filing season, it's probably too late to apply for a TCC for the current year. The IRS typically takes several weeks to process TCC applications, and we're already close to the January 31 deadline for issuing 1099s. I'd recommend going with one of the third-party e-filing services for this year. They're affordable for just one form and will ensure you meet the deadline. You could apply for a TCC later this year if you expect to be filing 1099s again next year.
Does anyone know if there's a minimum amount you need to pay someone before you're required to issue a 1099-MISC? We only paid about $2,500 to our property owner this year after our management fees.
The threshold for issuing a 1099-MISC for rent payments is $600. So if you paid the property owner at least $600 in rent during the year, you're required to issue a 1099-MISC with the amount reported in Box 1 (Rents). This is separate from the threshold for independent contractors, which is also $600 but would be reported in Box 3 instead. Since you're paying rent to a property owner, Box 1 is the appropriate place to report it.
Something nobody's mentioned yet - if you go with the IRS installment plan, make sure you adjust your W-4 and make estimated quarterly payments so you don't end up owing AGAIN next year while still paying off this debt. That happened to my cousin and it was a disaster. The Fresh Start program is good, but the IRS gets really strict if you owe taxes while already in a payment plan for previous taxes. They can cancel your agreement and demand full payment immediately.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. Since I'm transitioning to W-2 soon, what's the best way to make sure enough is withheld? Should I just put "0" allowances on my W-4? And how much should I set aside from my remaining 1099 income for the rest of this year?
I'd recommend using the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator on their website to calculate exactly what you need for your W-4. With your student loans and other deductions, putting "0" might withhold too much and hurt your monthly cash flow when you're already tight. For your remaining 1099 income, the general rule is to set aside about 30-35% of your gross earnings for federal, state, and self-employment taxes. Since you're in a combined income situation with your husband's W-2, it gets more complicated, but that percentage should keep you safe. Make quarterly estimated payments on those earnings to stay compliant and avoid next year's penalties.
One thing to consider - a credit union loan will show up on your credit report, while an IRS payment plan won't (unless they file a tax lien, which they typically don't for amounts under $25k if you're on a payment plan). So if you're planning any major purchases in the next few years that would require financing, the extra debt on your credit report might impact your rates.
This is actually not entirely correct. The IRS can file a Federal Tax Lien even for amounts under $25k in some circumstances. Also, while being on a payment plan itself doesn't report to credit bureaus, if you default on your payment plan, it absolutely can impact your credit indirectly through collection actions.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is to check if you're accidentally taking the child tax credit differently in each system. With TurboTax, sometimes the questions about dependents and childcare expenses can be confusing. Make sure you're consistently claiming your child as a dependent and correctly entering the childcare expenses. Also, double check if you're entering your student loan interest correctly. There's a cap on how much student loan interest you can deduct ($2,500), but sometimes people enter the total they paid rather than just the interest portion reported on Form 1098-E.
That's a really good point about the childcare expenses vs. child tax credit! I just checked both returns and you're absolutely right - in TurboTax I somehow entered our childcare expenses in a way that didn't qualify us for the full credit, but in the IRS system it applied correctly. That accounts for about $900 of the difference! The rest seems to be related to how the student loan interest was calculated. Thank you so much for pointing me in the right direction!
Happy to help! This is actually a really common issue. TurboTax sometimes separates the Child Tax Credit questions from the Child and Dependent Care Credit questions in a way that can be confusing. The Child Tax Credit is different from the Child and Dependent Care Credit (which is for childcare expenses specifically). To maximize both credits, you need to properly identify your child as a qualifying dependent AND correctly enter the childcare expenses. Glad you found the discrepancy!
I ran into a similar situation last year and learned a valuable lesson - always review the actual tax forms, not just the summary pages! Different tax software might show the same final numbers but arrive there differently. Did you actually download and compare the Form 1040 from both systems? Sometimes the interface will say one thing but the actual form shows something else. I'd specifically check Schedule 3 (for credits) and Schedule A (if you're itemizing) to see where the differences are.
Rudy Cenizo
Here's what people aren't mentioning - the type of settlement matters HUGELY for how it's taxed. If your settlement was for physical injuries or illness, that part is generally NOT taxable (even the attorney portion). If it was for emotional distress, lost wages, or punitive damages, different rules apply. What was your settlement for? That makes all the difference in whether you pay taxes on the full amount or not. Some settlements are completely tax-free while others are fully taxable.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
β’It was an employment lawsuit - wrongful termination and some back wages. Does that change things? I'm still confused about whether I need to itemize to deduct the attorney fees or if I can take the standard deduction AND still deduct the attorney portion somehow.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
β’That's actually good news! For employment-related lawsuits including wrongful termination, you can deduct your attorney fees as an "above-the-line" deduction. This means you can still take the standard deduction AND deduct your attorney fees. You'll want to look at Schedule 1, Line 24 "Other adjustments" and write "ATTORNEY FEES" next to it with the amount. This way you're not taxed on money that went straight to your attorney. Employment cases specifically have this special treatment thanks to a tax law change that was made specifically to address this unfair situation.
0 coins
Natalie Khan
The issue isn't just with settlements - it's with our stupid tax code in general. You're being double-taxed on money you never received! Your lawyer also pays taxes on that same money as income. So the government gets to tax the same dollar twice. And depending on your income level and state, you might end up paying 40%+ in taxes on money that you never even saw. The whole system is designed to extract maximum revenue.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
β’While I agree the tax code is complex, this isn't quite accurate. For employment-related cases (which OP mentioned in comments), the attorney fees can be deducted as an above-the-line deduction. Congress actually fixed this problem for certain types of cases, including employment claims, civil rights cases, and whistleblower claims specifically to prevent double taxation.
0 coins