


Ask the community...
10 One thing nobody's mentioned yet - check if your employer is withholding at the correct filing status. Sometimes HR systems default to "Single" even if you're married filing jointly, which can cause problems. Also, if you have any side income that doesn't have taxes withheld (freelance work, investments, etc.), you might need to make quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid owing a big sum at tax time.
6 How do you know if they're withholding at the right status? My W-4 says married but I'm not sure if they're actually doing it correctly.
10 You can check your paystub - it should indicate the withholding status they're using. Look for something like "Married" or "Single" near the federal tax withholding line. If it doesn't show, ask your payroll department to confirm what filing status they're using for your withholdings. If you want to be extra sure, you can also calculate what your withholding should be using the IRS withholding tables. Compare that to what's actually being withheld from your paycheck. Any significant difference might indicate they're using the wrong filing status.
2 I've found that the easiest solution is to just claim "0" allowances and check the box for additional withholding. Been doing it for years and always get a nice refund.
15 Just a quick correction - the W-4 form no longer uses allowances as of 2020. The form was completely redesigned. Instead of claiming "0" allowances, you would now use Step 2(c) to withhold at the higher single rate, or specify an additional dollar amount on Line 4(c). While getting a refund feels nice, remember that it means you're giving the government an interest-free loan throughout the year. Ideally, you want your withholding to be as close as possible to your actual tax liability - not too much, not too little.
One important thing to remember - if your wife's health insurance is through a Health Insurance Marketplace plan and you're receiving any premium tax credits, you'll need to file Form 8962 to reconcile those credits. That's where the 1095-A form becomes super important (not the 1095-B you mentioned). But if her insurance is just regular employer coverage, then what everyone else said is correct - you just need to indicate full year coverage on your return.
Thanks for bringing this up! Fortunately my wife's insurance is through her employer, not the Marketplace, so it sounds like I won't need to deal with Form 8962. I was worried I'd need to submit both 1095 forms or fill out some additional paperwork to show the transition, but it seems like as long as I can show continuous coverage throughout the year, I should be good.
Exactly, with employer coverage you won't need Form 8962. And just to clarify for everyone reading this thread - the 1095 forms are primarily informational and proof of coverage. You typically don't attach them to your return or enter detailed information from them. For most people with employer coverage, tax software will just ask if you had full-year health insurance coverage, and you'll check "yes." Keep the 1095 forms with your tax records in case there are questions later, but the process is pretty simple.
Has anyone actually ever been audited over health insurance coverage? I've had gaps and never reported them, nobody ever noticed...
The individual mandate penalty (for not having coverage) was effectively eliminated starting in 2019 when the penalty amount was reduced to $0. So at the federal level, there's no penalty anymore. But some states like Massachusetts, New Jersey, California, DC, and Rhode Island have their own penalties if you don't have coverage.
Have you looked at H&R Block's free version? I think they handle some investment income for free, but there might be limits. Worth checking out.
Thanks for suggesting H&R Block. I actually tried their free version first before TurboTax, but they also wanted me to upgrade as soon as I entered my 1099-DIV information. Seems like most of the big companies use investments as a trigger for their premium versions.
That's frustrating! These companies are really aggressive with their upselling. Maybe try starting at the IRS Free File page (https://www.irs.gov/filing/free-file-do-your-federal-taxes-for-free) instead of going directly to the tax prep sites. Sometimes the versions you access through the IRS have fewer restrictions.
Slightly off-topic but if you're making so little in dividends and trading profits, maybe look into tax-advantaged accounts like Roth IRA for your investments? Then you wouldn't have to report those dividends or gains at all!
I've used FreeTaxUSA for the last 7 years and ran into this exact problem. Here's the actual sequence in the current software: 1. Go to Income ā Retirement/Social Security ā IRA, Pension, and Annuity Distributions 2. Enter your 1099-R information 3. When asked "Is this a qualified distribution?" select NO (since you're under 59½) 4. In the next screens, it will ask if you've made any after-tax contributions to the IRA 5. Answer YES 6. It will then ask for your "basis" - this is where you enter your total contributions ($65k in your case) 7. The software should then correctly calculate that your $12k distribution is non-taxable The system is designed to handle this, but the navigation is definitely confusing. Also make sure you've completed Form 8606 in prior years if you've made non-deductible contributions.
This is EXACTLY what I needed! I found all these screens after following your steps. The key was answering NO to the qualified distribution question but then YES to the after-tax contributions question. FreeTaxUSA is now correctly showing the distribution as non-taxable on my draft 1040. I was stuck in a loop because I was looking in the wrong section entirely. Thank you so much for the detailed steps!
Glad to help! One more tip - save a copy of your Form 8606 each year as documentation of your contribution basis. The IRS can request proof of your contribution history if they ever question the tax-free status of your distributions. This happens more often than people realize with Roth accounts.
Has anyone tried switching to another software? I had a similar problem with FreeTaxUSA and ended up using TaxSlayer instead, which handled my Roth distributions much more intuitively.
Cameron Black
3 Don't forget about Form 8833 if you're claiming any treaty benefits as a dual-status alien! I messed this up my first year and got a nasty letter from the IRS. You need to disclose any positions where you're using a tax treaty to override standard tax rules.
0 coins
Cameron Black
ā¢9 Is Form 8833 required for all treaty benefits? I thought there were some exceptions where you don't need to file it?
0 coins
Cameron Black
ā¢3 You're right that there are exceptions. You generally don't need Form 8833 for treaty-reduced withholding on dividends, interest, royalties, etc. Also, if you're claiming treaty benefits that provide exemptions from tax on certain types of income (like scholarships), you might not need it. But for most substantial treaty positions - especially anything related to your residency status determination, permanent establishment issues, or business profits - you absolutely need it. Better safe than sorry - if you're claiming any significant treaty benefit, I'd recommend filing the form.
0 coins
Cameron Black
21 Quick question - are there any special rules about retirement account contributions during a dual-status year? I started a 401k with my employer in the US part of the year but not sure if I'm eligible for the full contribution limit.
0 coins
Cameron Black
ā¢10 For 401k, if your employer offers it and you're eligible based on their plan rules, you can generally contribute regardless of your tax status. However, your contribution limit would be based on your U.S. taxable compensation only.
0 coins