


Ask the community...
I've been trying to submit my taxes electronically since yesterday but I keep hitting a wall. Every time I submit, I get a rejection email with this weird error: Issue: Business Rule X0000-005 - The XML data has failed schema validation. cvc-complex-type.2.4.a. Invalid content was found starting with element 'WagesNotShownAmt'. One of '{"http://www.irs.gov/efile":WagesLiteralCd}' is expected. It also says: Field/Xpath: /efile:Return[1]/efile:ReturnData[1]/efile:WagesNotShownSchedule[1]/efile:WagesNotShownSch[1]/efile:WagesNotShownAmt[1] This might as well be in another language! I have two different W-2s and I've entered everything correctly as far as I can tell. Why is it saying "not shown"? I saw an old post suggesting it might be related to punctuation in the forms, so I went through and removed everything except spaces and hyphens. Still no luck after checking everything three times. Do I have to give up on e-filing and mail this thing in? My refund is pretty decent this year and I don't want to wait forever to get it. Has anyone run into this specific error before? UPDATE: I figured it out! Posting the solution in case anyone else gets stuck with this same issue. I had put my total wages in both the white box on the left side of Line 1 AND in the column on the right. Apparently you're only supposed to put the final number in the right column. When I cleared out the white box on the left and only kept the number in the right column, the system accepted my return immediately. Such a small thing causing so much frustration!
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that you need to be careful about wash sales when dealing with capital losses. If you sell an investment at a loss and then buy the same or a "substantially identical" investment within 30 days before or after the sale, it's considered a wash sale and you can't claim the loss on your taxes right away. I learned this the hard way when I thought I had $8k in losses to carry over, but because I had rebought some of the same stocks within the 30-day window, about $3k of my losses were disallowed as wash sales. The loss doesn't disappear forever, but it gets added to the cost basis of the replacement shares, so you don't get the tax benefit until you eventually sell those shares.
How exactly do you track this stuff? Like if I sold some Tesla at a loss in December but then bought some again in January, do I have to manually figure out the wash sale or will my brokerage statement show it? This whole capital loss thing is making my head spin.
Most brokerages will track wash sales for you on your 1099-B forms and year-end tax statements. They'll have a column that shows "Wash Sale Loss Disallowed" or something similar. However, they only track wash sales within the same brokerage account - they won't know if you sold in one account and bought in another, or if your spouse bought the same security in their account. If you're doing your taxes with software like TurboTax or H&R Block, they'll usually flag potential wash sales when you enter your trading information. But it's always good to review your brokerage statements carefully and look for those wash sale notations, especially if you're an active trader or if you're trading the same securities across multiple accounts.
Also, make sure you understand the difference between short-term and long-term capital gains/losses. If you held the investment for less than a year before selling at a loss, it's short-term. More than a year, it's long-term. When you apply carried-over losses, short-term losses first offset short-term gains (taxed at your ordinary income rate), and long-term losses offset long-term gains (taxed at the preferential capital gains rates). Only after you've offset gains of the same type can you apply remaining losses to the other type. This order of operations can make a big difference in your tax bill if you have a mix of short and long-term transactions! Many people miss this nuance.
Great point! I just want to add that this is why tax software can sometimes get this wrong. It gets complicated fast when you have multiple types of gains and losses from different years. My tax guy showed me how one year I had long-term losses but short-term gains the next year, and the software didn't optimize how they offset each other. Had to manually override it which saved me almost $900.
Just to add a practical tip - when I was learning 1.960-2, I created a simple Excel template that breaks down the deemed paid credit calculation formula. The key is tracking: 1) The US shareholder's pro rata share of the CFC's Subpart F/GILTI 2) The CFC's foreign income taxes paid 3) The CFC's total earnings and profits The basic concept is that you're essentially figuring out what percentage of the foreign corp's income is coming to the US as Subpart F/GILTI, then allowing that same percentage of foreign taxes as a deemed paid credit.
That Excel approach sounds really helpful! Would you be willing to share a sanitized version of that template? I'm trying to create something similar but want to make sure I'm setting it up correctly.
I can't share the actual file for confidentiality reasons, but I can describe the basic structure. I have columns for each relevant CFCs and rows that calculate: The CFC's total E&P for the year, then the portion that's Subpart F and the portion that's GILTI. Below that, I list the total foreign taxes paid by the CFC. Then I compute the deemed paid taxes by multiplying the foreign taxes by the ratio of included income (Subpart F or GILTI) to total E&P. Don't forget that for GILTI inclusions under 960(d), you only get 80% of the deemed paid taxes. And everything needs to be tracked by separate income baskets too!
Just fyi, it's worth noting that the TCJA really changed how 960 works. Before 2018, we used to have this pooling approach for deemed paid credits, but now it's calculated on a current-year basis. If you're studying older materials, make sure they reflect the post-TCJA rules!
One thing to consider with land sales - the property tax assessor is NOT the authority on fair market value for capital gains purposes. I made this mistake and it caused problems. The IRS cares about the actual amount you sold it for (minus selling expenses) compared to your purchase price (plus improvements). If you've owned the land since 2009, make sure you have documentation of the original purchase and any improvements. If you don't have receipts for improvements, the IRS typically won't allow you to add them to your basis.
Thanks, that's really helpful! Actually, my dad has been meticulous about keeping records. He's got the original purchase documents from when he bought it, plus receipts for clearing some areas, putting in a gravel access road, and installing some drainage systems. Would all of those count as improvements to the property?
Yes, all of those would likely qualify as capital improvements that increase your basis! Clearing land, access roads, and drainage systems are classic examples of improvements that add to your cost basis because they're not regular maintenance but actual improvements to the property. Make sure you have those receipts organized and ready to provide if needed. The higher your documented basis, the less capital gain you'll have to report. This is exactly why keeping good records is so important with investment properties.
Just to add - capital gains rates depend on your total income too. If your dad's income is below $44,625 (single) or $89,250 (married) for 2025, the capital gains rate might be 0%! Between that and the next threshold (around $492k single/$553k married) it's 15%. Above that it's 20%. Plus some states add their own capital gains taxes on top of federal.
For what it's worth, I've had two jobs with very different pay scales for years (one $85K, one about $5K). I never check the multiple jobs box and just claim single/zero on both W-4s. This has always resulted in a refund at tax time. The withholding from my main job covers most of my tax liability, and the little bit withheld from my smaller job is just extra cushion. Simple approach but it works for me!
But doesn't the new W-4 not have allowances anymore? I thought they got rid of the "0 allowances" option in 2020 when they redesigned the form.
You're absolutely right, and I should have been more clear. On the new W-4 form, I don't check the multiple jobs box, and I don't claim any adjustments to income or deductions. This effectively results in maximum withholding (similar to what "0 allowances" used to do on the old form). The principle is the same though - I let my main job withhold at the standard rate, and then my smaller job also withholds at the standard rate. Since the withholding tables don't "know" about my other job, I end up with a bit more withheld than necessary, which gives me a refund rather than owing taxes.
I made a huge mistake with my W-4 last year - checked the multiple jobs box for both my main job ($90K) and my weekend job ($7K), and they BOTH withheld as if I was making double the income at each job. Got a massive refund but my paychecks were tiny all year! Don't overthink it - with such a small second job, just make sure you're withholding enough at your main job. The IRS withholding calculator on their website can help you figure out the exact amount if you want to be precise.
Layla Mendes
Just so others know - these XML schema validation errors usually happen with fields that have specific format requirements. The one that got me last year was putting cents in my estimated tax payments using a decimal point (like 1500.00) when the field was only supposed to have whole numbers (1500). Took me forever to figure out!
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
ā¢Wait really? So we're not supposed to use decimal points at all in the tax forms? I've been doing mine wrong for years then...
0 coins
Layla Mendes
ā¢It depends on the specific field in the tax software. Some fields accept decimals, while others require whole numbers only. The problem is that most tax software doesn't warn you about this until you try to e-file and get rejected. For example, estimated tax payment fields typically want whole dollars only, no cents. But some deduction fields might accept exact amounts with cents. The IRS e-file specifications are incredibly detailed about which fields accept which formats, but regular taxpayers never see these rules. That's why these errors are so frustrating - we're basically being asked to comply with technical specifications we can't see.
0 coins
Aria Park
Throwing in another tip - sometimes these XML errors can be caused by special characters in name fields. I got rejected because I had "O'Brien" as my employer name, and the apostrophe caused an XML validation error. Had to remove it to get accepted.
0 coins
Noah Ali
ā¢OMG thank you!!! I think this might be my issue. My employer's name has an ampersand in it (Something & Sons LLC) and I keep getting rejected. Going to try removing it now!
0 coins