This! I live in NY and they're just as aggressive as the feds about taxing foreign income. Double check your state tax laws.

This happened to me with a much smaller amount ($150k) from selling property overseas. My account got frozen for like 2 weeks while they verified everything. Super annoying.

Yes, it's become extremely common even with smaller amounts. The banking regulations have tightened significantly under anti-money laundering laws. I recommend contacting your bank before the transfer to ask about their specific documentation requirements and procedures for large incoming international wires. Some banks handle it much better than others. I've seen people have funds held for up to 30 days during verification, which can be a serious problem if you need access to the money. Having all your documentation organized in advance and possibly even working with a private banker at your institution can make the process go much more smoothly.

No, that's not accurate. The Roth IRA contribution limits for 2024 were $6,500 for people under 50 and $7,500 for people 50 and older. The income phase-out ranges for 2024 were $138,000-$153,000 for single filers and $218,000-$228,000 for married filing jointly. There were no surprise adjustments or reductions.

That's a great point I hadn't considered. We're in Oregon. Does anyone know if Oregon generally follows federal guidelines on settlement taxation or if they have their own rules?

Oregon generally follows federal treatment for physical injury settlements, so if your portion qualifies as tax-exempt under federal rules, it should also be exempt from Oregon state income tax. However, the key is still getting clarity on whether your guardian portion maintains the same character as the physical injury settlement. If the federal determination is that it's taxable as guardian fees, Oregon would likely treat it the same way.

This is definitely the best advice. I'm a paralegal at a firm that handles injury cases, and we always make sure to include specific language about tax treatment of guardian portions. If your attorney didn't do this, they really should have.

But isn't it still smart to plan ahead? I mean, even if the full 44.6% doesn't pass, there could be some increase, right? Better safe than sorry...

Planning ahead is always good, but I wouldn't make any drastic moves based on proposals that haven't even made it to committee yet. If you're really concerned, the best approach is probably to run multiple scenarios - what happens if rates stay the same, what happens if they go up moderately, and what happens in the worst case. Then identify strategies that work reasonably well across all scenarios. The biggest mistake would be making irreversible financial decisions based on tax proposals that might never materialize.

I've been using H&R Block Premium, and they have a "tax calculator" feature that lets you adjust income types and tax rates to see different scenarios. It's not super sophisticated but it gave me a rough idea of how different capital gains rates would affect my bottom line.

Thanks for the suggestion! I'll take a look at H&R Block. I really need something that can help me visualize the impact since I'm planning to sell a rental property next year that I've owned for about 15 years. The potential tax difference between current rates and the proposed rates would be substantial for me.

Does this work if my employer has me working from home 3 days a week? Or is it only for self-employed people?

Unfortunately, it's currently only available if you're self-employed or run your own business. W-2 employees working from home (even full-time) can't take the home office deduction anymore after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Before 2018, W-2 employees could deduct unreimbursed business expenses (including home office costs) as miscellaneous itemized deductions, but that provision was suspended until 2025. If you're working remotely as a W-2 employee, your best option is to ask your employer about expense reimbursement programs instead of looking for tax deductions.

I actually think it depends on where you live. In high-tax, high-cost areas (California, New York, etc.), the mortgage interest and property taxes can be substantial enough to make itemizing worthwhile. In my case (Bay Area), my property taxes alone are over $18k, so combined with mortgage interest and charitable giving, itemizing saves me several thousand dollars compared to the standard deduction.