


Ask the community...
Don't forget about depreciation recapture when you sell! Everyone focuses on the capital gains, but the depreciation recapture at 25% can be a nasty surprise if you haven't planned for it. Every year you've owned that rental, you've been taking depreciation (or should have been), and the IRS wants that back upon sale.
I've been claiming depreciation each year, but I'm not sure I understand how the recapture works. Do I pay 25% on the total amount I've claimed in depreciation over the years? And is there any way to reduce this tax hit?
Yes, you'll pay 25% on all the depreciation you've claimed (or were required to claim even if you didn't). It's separate from your capital gains tax and is reported on Form 4797. One way to potentially defer both capital gains and depreciation recapture tax is by doing a 1031 exchange into another investment property. But that only works if you want to stay in real estate investing, not if you're cashing out. There are strict timelines though - you need to identify potential replacement properties within 45 days of selling and complete the purchase within 180 days. You also need to use a qualified intermediary to hold the funds. Not simple, but it can save a ton in taxes if you're staying in the real estate game.
Quick question for anyone who might know - I'm replacing carpeting in my rental before selling. Is this a repair (deductible) or improvement (added to basis)? It's just standard carpet, nothing fancy.
Replacing carpet is generally considered a repair as long as you're not upgrading substantially. So if you're replacing worn carpet with similar quality carpet, that would be a repair expense you can deduct on Schedule E this year rather than adding to basis.
If you're using H&R Block, try clicking "I'll enter my information without the form" instead of saying yes/no to whether you received it. I had the same problem last year and that option worked for me. Then you can just enter the small fees you paid in 2024 manually. Remember that your main tuition expenses were properly claimed on your 2023 return if box 7 was checked on that form.
Thank you! I just checked and I do see that option now. I think part of my confusion was that I started by saying "No" to receiving the form, which took me down a different path. When I went back and looked for the option you mentioned, I found it. I'll try entering just the graduation fees I paid in 2024. Does anyone know if graduation fees qualify as education expenses for tax purposes?
Graduation fees sometimes qualify and sometimes don't - it depends on whether they were required for your enrollment or attendance. Generally, optional fees like ceremony costs, cap and gown, etc., don't qualify. But required graduation fees that you had to pay to receive your degree would typically count as qualified education expenses. If you're unsure, check your student account statement to see how the fees are categorized. Required fees will usually qualify, while optional services typically don't.
Just to add another perspective - I'm a grad student too and had something similar happen. My university's financial aid office explained that schools aren't required to provide a 1098-T if you didn't have any qualified expenses in that tax year that weren't covered by scholarships/grants.
That's exactly right. According to IRS guidelines, educational institutions don't need to issue a 1098-T if there were no qualified tuition and related expenses paid that year, or if all expenses were covered by scholarships/grants. The November 2023 payment would've been on the 2023 form (with box 7 checked since the classes were in 2024).
Don't forget to factor in the quality of the plans too! I almost went with my employer plan for tax reasons until I realized it had a $4000 higher deductible and smaller network than my private plan. Sometimes the better coverage outweighs the tax benefits. Also, check if you qualify for ACA subsidies with your private plan. Depending on your income, those could be substantial and might not be reflected in the premium you're comparing.
Thanks for bringing up the non-tax factors! You're right that I should be looking at the whole picture. The deductible on my private plan is actually $3,500 lower than my employer's plan, and my regular specialists are all in-network with my current coverage. I don't qualify for ACA subsidies unfortunately - my income is too high. But the network difference is definitely significant. I guess I need to assign some dollar value to having better coverage and a lower deductible to make a fair comparison.
Absolutely! A $3,500 deductible difference is significant. One approach is to consider your typical annual healthcare usage. If you regularly meet your deductible, that $3,500 is a real savings that offsets some of the tax benefits. Also consider coverage for specific services you use regularly. For example, I discovered my employer plan had much worse mental health coverage than my private plan - fewer visits covered and higher copays. For someone who uses therapy regularly, that difference alone could be worth thousands.
Has anyone considered the impact of self-employment taxes in this calculation? If you're a true 1099 contractor (not W-2), you can deduct health insurance premiums as a business expense which reduces your self-employment tax base. That's an additional 15.3% savings on top of income tax savings!
This is an important distinction! The OP mentioned they're employed "by contract" but that could mean either W-2 through a contracting agency or true 1099 self-employment. If you're W-2, you can't deduct private health insurance premiums against self-employment taxes since you don't pay those - your employer pays half of FICA and you pay half through withholding. But if you're 1099, the self-employed health insurance deduction is super valuable. It reduces your income for income tax purposes AND self-employment tax purposes, which is huge.
From the employer perspective, there's another issue nobody's mentioned yet. If they start offering this benefit to you, other employees will inevitably ask for different specialized benefits that help their specific situation. Some might want childcare assistance, others might want housing allowances, and others might want additional retirement matching. Once you open that door of customized benefits, it's hard to close it without seeming arbitrary about which needs the company chooses to accommodate.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. Do you think it would help if I framed it as an option the company could offer to everyone rather than just for my situation? Maybe present research on how many employees might have student loans?
Approaching it as a company-wide benefit is definitely the better strategy. Do some research on companies in your industry that offer this benefit and how they implement it. Gather data on average student loan debt for professionals in your field and typical program structures. Then create a brief proposal showing the potential impact on employee retention and recruitment. Many companies find that student loan assistance programs significantly improve their ability to attract and retain younger talent, which often provides ROI that exceeds the program costs. Frame it as a competitive advantage rather than a personal accommodation.
One thing to consider - companies can structure this benefit in different ways. Instead of redirecting your signing bonus (which is already committed compensation), see if they'd be open to a program where they match student loan payments up to a certain amount each month. My employer does a $100/month match for student loan payments, which doesn't hit the $5250 max but is more manageable from their administration standpoint. They started small to test the program before potentially expanding it.
The matching approach is smart. My company started with $50/month matching and it was popular enough that they increased it to $200/month the following year. Much easier for them to implement than lump sums.
KingKongZilla
Just wanted to add that if the gymnastics academy is a 501(c)(3) specifically (not all nonprofits are - there are different types of 501c organizations), they could potentially set up a scholarship or general travel fund that people could donate to directly. This would make the donations tax-deductible while still supporting the team's travel. The important distinction is that donors cannot earmark their contributions for specific students. The nonprofit must maintain control over how the funds are used, even if they end up using them for your team's trip.
0 coins
Kelsey Chin
ā¢That's a great idea! Do you know if there's a way to check what specific type of nonprofit they are? Their website just says "nonprofit organization" but doesn't specify the 501c classification.
0 coins
KingKongZilla
ā¢You can look up their tax-exempt status using the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search tool at https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/. Just enter the organization's name or EIN number. You could also just ask the organization directly - they should know their tax status. If they're a 501(c)(3), they're eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions. If they're another type of 501(c) organization (like a 501(c)(7) social club), then donations wouldn't be deductible even if made directly to them.
0 coins
Rebecca Johnston
One option nobody has mentioned - could the instructor invoice the academy directly for the international competition, and then you make donations directly to the academy's general fund (not earmarked)? Then the academy could choose to allocate those funds to pay the instructor for the competition. The key difference is the money flow and who has control. If donors give to the academy's general operating fund with no strings attached, those could be deductible. Then it's the academy's decision how to use those funds.
0 coins
Nathan Dell
ā¢This is actually a gray area that could get the nonprofit in trouble. If there's an understanding that donations to the "general fund" are actually intended to pay for specific students' expenses, the IRS could consider it a disguised payment for services rather than a donation. The nonprofit could risk their tax-exempt status if they're facilitating this type of arrangement.
0 coins