


Ask the community...
Everyone's talking about adjusting allowances, but FYI the W4 form completely changed in 2020. It doesn't use allowances anymore. Now you fill out different steps about multiple jobs, dependents, and other adjustments. You'll need to fill out the new form which asks for dollar amounts in some sections rather than the old allowance numbers. The IRS calculator should give you instructions based on the new form format.
This is correct but many payroll systems still use the old terminology internally. When I submitted my "new" W4 last year, my HR portal still asked for "allowance" numbers even though the official form doesn't use that term anymore. It's confusing for sure.
I was in almost the exact same situation last year - new job after unemployment and accidentally claimed 0 allowances on my W4. The stress is real when you see those huge tax withholdings! Here's what I learned: You're absolutely allowed to adjust your withholding to reflect your actual tax situation. The key point everyone's making about being unemployed for half the year is spot-on - your total annual income will be much lower than what payroll assumes when they see your current salary. I ended up using the IRS withholding calculator just like you did, and it suggested a similar adjustment. Changed my W4 from 0 to 4 allowances (this was before the new form) and it worked out perfectly. Got a small refund instead of the massive one I was heading toward. Don't stress about the legal aspect - adjusting your W4 for legitimate reasons like unemployment periods is exactly what the system is designed for. The IRS wants you to pay the right amount throughout the year, not massively overpay. Just make sure to use their official calculator and you'll be fine.
Thanks for sharing your experience! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same situation. The stress is definitely real - I kept second-guessing myself wondering if I was doing something wrong by wanting to adjust it so much. Did you run into any issues with your employer when you made such a big change from 0 to 4? And how quickly did you see the adjustment in your paychecks? I'm hoping to get this sorted out before my next pay period so I can stop giving the government such a massive interest-free loan!
Percentage-based fees used to be more common years ago, but they're now considered unethical by professional organizations like the NAEA (National Association of Enrolled Agents). There are still some preparers who do this though, especially in communities where people aren't familiar with standard industry practices. It's not technically illegal in most states, but it's definitely a warning sign of a preparer who might bend rules to inflate refunds.
So if it's not illegal, why is everyone saying it's such a bad thing? If someone can get me a bigger refund than I could get myself, why shouldn't they get a piece of it?
The problem is that a "bigger refund" isn't always legitimate. When preparers get paid based on refund size, they have a financial incentive to claim deductions or credits you might not actually qualify for. Sure, you get more money upfront, but when the IRS audits you later (which they often do with suspicious returns), YOU have to pay back the incorrect refund plus penalties and interest - not the preparer who already got paid and disappeared. Think of it this way: would you trust a mechanic who only gets paid if they find expensive problems with your car? The incentive structure creates conflicts of interest that can hurt you in the long run, even if the initial result seems beneficial.
Your instincts are absolutely right to be concerned. I've been doing taxes professionally for over 15 years, and percentage-based fees are a major red flag in our industry. It's one of the first things we learn NOT to do in legitimate tax preparation courses. The biggest issue is that it creates what we call a "perverse incentive" - the preparer makes more money by inflating your refund, regardless of whether those inflated deductions are actually legitimate. I've seen too many cases where clients got audited years later and had to pay back thousands in incorrect refunds, plus penalties that sometimes doubled the original amount owed. If your cousin is serious about this field, encourage him to look into proper certification like becoming an Enrolled Agent or getting training through the IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program. These programs emphasize ethical practices and would teach him legitimate fee structures - either flat fees based on form complexity or hourly rates. That's how he can build a sustainable, ethical practice that actually helps people instead of putting them at risk.
This is really helpful advice! As someone who's always done my own taxes but has been considering getting professional help as my situation gets more complex, it's good to know what red flags to watch out for. The VITA program sounds like a great suggestion for the cousin - I've heard they do quality work and it would give him proper training in ethical practices. Do you have any thoughts on what questions someone should ask when interviewing potential tax preparers to make sure they're legitimate and ethical?
Has anyone used the S Corporation basis worksheet from Form 1120-S instructions? It's really helpful for tracking your basis from year to year and would answer your question immediately about whether distributions exceed basis. I'm an enrolled agent and see this issue all the time. Clients think they're getting capital gain treatment when actually they've been calculating their basis incorrectly for years.
I haven't been using that worksheet specifically. Honestly, I've been relying on my tax software to track it, but I'm not sure it's doing it correctly given all the specialized circumstances with a single-member LLC that elected S status. I'll definitely check out that worksheet. Is it complicated to fill out if I have several years to catch up on?
It's not overly complicated, but it does require information from your previous tax returns. You'll need your initial capital contributions, all reported income and losses from prior years' K-1s, any additional capital contributions, prior distributions, and certain adjustment items like charitable contributions. If you're catching up multiple years, I recommend starting with the earliest year and working forward. Each year builds on the previous year's ending basis. The worksheet is in the instructions for Form 1120-S (not in the form itself). It helps ensure you're considering all basis adjustments, including those often overlooked like nondeductible expenses and tax-exempt income. These items affect basis but are often missed by basic tax software, especially if you're using consumer-grade programs rather than professional tax preparation software.
This is exactly the kind of confusion I had when I first started dealing with S-corp distributions! After reading through all these responses, I want to emphasize something that might help clarify things for you. The key insight is that there are really two separate tax events happening with S-corporations: 1) The business profits flow through to you personally and are taxed as ordinary income on your K-1, regardless of whether you actually take any money out of the business. This happens every year the business is profitable. 2) When you take distributions, those are generally tax-free up to your basis (which includes your initial investment plus all those profits you already paid tax on). Only distributions ABOVE your basis get capital gains treatment. So you're not getting "double taxed" - you pay ordinary income rates on the business profits, then if you distribute more than your total basis, that excess gets the more favorable capital gains treatment. The confusion often comes from mixing up these two separate events. I'd definitely recommend using that S Corporation basis worksheet that Mateo mentioned to get a clear picture of where you stand. And yes, the reasonable compensation issue Nia brought up is super important - the IRS definitely scrutinizes S-corps that pay minimal salaries with large distributions.
I work in payroll and just want to confirm what others have said - income counts when it's paid, not when it's earned. Your 1/3/2025 check will be reported on your 2025 W-2, even though some of those days were worked in 2024.
That's such a relief to hear from someone in payroll! So even if I work Dec 26-31, since that paycheck won't come until January, none of that will count toward my 2024 income total? I was so worried I'd have to take unpaid time off.
That's correct! As long as your paycheck date is January 3, 2025, those earnings will count toward your 2025 income for tax purposes, regardless of when you actually performed the work. The key is the payment date, not the work date. Since you're staying under $50K with your December 23rd check, you should be fine for your grant requirements. Just make sure to double-check with your grant administrator about their specific income calculation method to be 100% certain.
Just to add another perspective - I went through something similar with a scholarship that had income limits. The key thing that helped me was getting everything in writing from both my employer's HR department and the grant/scholarship office about their specific income calculation methods. Even though the general tax rule is that income counts when received (not when earned), some grant programs have their own definitions. For example, my scholarship looked at "income earned" during the calendar year rather than "income received." It's rare, but it does happen. I'd recommend emailing your grant administrator with your specific situation - mentioning that you'll have December work days paid in January - and asking them to confirm in writing how they handle this scenario. That way you have documentation if any questions come up later. Most grant offices are pretty responsive to these kinds of clarification requests, especially when you explain the stakes involved. Better to spend a few minutes getting official confirmation than to risk losing thousands in grant money over a misunderstanding!
Caleb Stone
I just went through this exact same ID.me hell about two weeks ago! The "device not recognized" loop is absolutely infuriating. Here's what finally worked for me after trying everything else: I had to use my work laptop (different device) connected to my phone's hotspot (different network) and switch to a backup phone number for verification codes. Apparently ID.me flags your usual setup after too many failed attempts. Also try logging in super early in the morning like 6am - their servers seem less overwhelmed then. If you're completely stuck, the congressional office route someone mentioned actually works - my friend's mom did that and got a callback from the IRS within 48 hours. It shouldn't be this hard to access our own tax information, but at least there are workarounds. Don't give up!
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
ā¢This is super helpful! I'm dealing with the exact same issue right now and have been stuck for almost two weeks. The idea of using a completely different device and network makes total sense - I've been trying from my home computer on my regular wifi this whole time, which is probably flagged by now. I'm going to try borrowing my roommate's laptop and using my work phone number for verification. The early morning login tip is really smart too - I never considered that server load could affect verification success rates. Thanks for sharing actual solutions instead of just complaining! Really appreciate the congressional office backup option too, that's good to know if all else fails.
0 coins
Finnegan Gunn
I've been dealing with this same ID.me nightmare for the past month! What finally broke me out of the loop was using a completely fresh approach: I borrowed my neighbor's tablet, connected it to the coffee shop wifi down the street, and created a brand new ID.me account with my old college email address. The key was using a phone number I'd never used with ID.me before (my work cell). The whole verification process went smoothly since their system didn't have any failed attempt flags on that combination. Took about 20 minutes total and I finally got access to my transcripts. Sometimes you just have to outsmart their security system by starting completely clean. Also learned that if you've failed too many times from the same device/network combo, you're basically blacklisted for a while. Hope this helps someone else avoid the weeks of frustration I went through!
0 coins
Zane Hernandez
ā¢This is brilliant! The "fresh start" approach makes so much sense - I never thought about how all my failed attempts from the same device/network were probably creating a digital paper trail that was working against me. Using a completely different location, device, AND phone number is genius. I've been banging my head against the wall trying to use my home setup over and over. Going to try the coffee shop method this weekend with my backup email and my Google Voice number. Really appreciate you sharing the specific details about what worked instead of just saying "try something different." The 20 minute success story gives me hope after weeks of frustration!
0 coins