UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Finnegan Gunn

•

Bottom line - there's no such thing as "UCC authenticated demand definition" in Article 9. Your legal team is either confused or referring to some other requirement. I'd push back and ask for specific citations.

0 coins

Miguel Harvey

•

Good luck. Sometimes you have to educate your own legal department about UCC requirements.

0 coins

Finnegan Gunn

•

Sad but true. I've had to correct lawyers about basic UCC filing requirements more times than I care to count.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

I've seen this exact confusion before at my institution. What likely happened is someone saw "authenticated record" in UCC 9-102(a)(7) and conflated it with demand letters. But that definition only applies to security agreements and financing statements, not collection notices. Your certified mail approach is probably fine unless your loan agreements specifically require something else. I'd suggest asking legal to point to the exact UCC section they're referencing - my guess is they won't be able to find one because it doesn't exist for demands.

0 coins

Aisha Hussain

•

This is exactly the kind of clarification I was looking for! The distinction between "authenticated record" for security agreements versus collection demands makes perfect sense. I'm definitely going to ask legal to cite the specific UCC section they think applies. Based on everyone's responses here, it sounds like this is a common misunderstanding that happens when people mix up different UCC concepts.

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

Just closed a similar deal last month. The key is treating the documentation review process seriously - any inconsistencies between your GSA and UCC filings could create gaps in your security position. I actually found Certana.ai's document comparison feature really helpful for flagging potential issues before filing.

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

How did you handle the timing coordination between the two countries' filing systems?

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

We staged everything so the Canadian registration and US UCC-1s were filed within 24 hours of each other. Minimized any gap period where we might have been unperfected somewhere.

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

One more thing to consider - make sure you're clear on which province the Canadian equipment is located in, as each province has its own PPSA registry system. Ontario's system works differently than Alberta's or BC's, for example. Also, if any equipment crosses provincial borders after your initial filing, you might need additional registrations. The interaction between provincial PPSA systems and state UCC systems can get really complex, so definitely get that local counsel involved early in the process.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Great point about provincial variations! I'm new to cross-border deals and this is exactly the kind of detail I wouldn't have thought about. So if equipment moves between provinces after filing, do you need to file amendments in multiple PPSA systems? And how does that affect the US UCC priority if the Canadian collateral location changes?

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the help! I ended up filing separate UCC-1s for each guarantor and the main borrower. All accepted by the SOS office. The spreadsheet approach really helped me stay organized, and the document verification tool caught two name issues I would have missed. Loan closed successfully!

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

So glad this worked out! I'm dealing with a similar situation next week and this thread has been incredibly helpful.

0 coins

Chloe Wilson

•

Great outcome. These multi-party secured transactions are tricky but following the basic rules - separate filings for each debtor, exact legal names, consistent collateral descriptions - usually gets you there.

0 coins

As someone new to secured transactions, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm curious about the timing aspect - how far in advance of closing should you typically prepare and file UCC-1s? I've heard conflicting advice about whether to file before or after loan documents are signed. Also, if a filing gets rejected, how much time do you usually have to correct and refile before it affects the closing timeline?

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

Great question! I typically prepare UCC-1s early but file them the day of or day before closing to ensure the security agreements are fully executed first. Most states process electronic filings within a few hours, so you can usually get immediate confirmation. If there's a rejection, you typically have the same business day to correct and refile without affecting closing if you catch it quickly. The key is having everything prepared and double-checked beforehand so any corrections are just minor tweaks. I always build in a buffer day before closing just in case of filing issues.

0 coins

Summary for anyone else reading this: Illinois UCC-1 electronic filing is $25, UCC-3 amendments/continuations are $25, UCC searches are $15 per name. Paper filings cost more. Make sure debtor names match exactly or you'll pay twice. Portal registration takes time so set it up early.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Perfect summary, thanks! This thread answered all my questions about Illinois UCC filing fees and more.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

Bookmarking this thread. Really helpful info about the name matching requirements especially.

0 coins

CyberNinja

•

Thanks everyone for the comprehensive breakdown! As someone new to Illinois UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly helpful. One follow-up question - does the Illinois portal have any bulk filing options if you're submitting multiple UCC-1s at once, or do you have to process each one individually? With several filings to do, I'm wondering if there's a way to streamline the process beyond just having all the documents ready to go.

0 coins

Keisha Brown

•

Good question! Unfortunately Illinois doesn't have a true bulk upload feature like some other states. You have to submit each UCC-1 individually through their portal. However, once you get the hang of the interface, it goes pretty quickly - maybe 2-3 minutes per filing if you have all your debtor info and collateral descriptions prepared in advance. Just make sure to save drafts as you go in case the portal times out on you.

0 coins

Bottom line - UCC searches are standard due diligence for any secured lending. They're not something to worry about, just part of the process. As long as you don't have any surprises hiding in there, it should be straightforward.

0 coins

Thanks everyone, this has been really helpful. I feel much better about understanding what's involved now.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

Just remember to review the results carefully and ask questions if anything looks confusing. Better to sort it out upfront.

0 coins

One more tip - if you do find existing UCC filings during your search, don't panic. Having secured debt isn't necessarily a deal-breaker for new lenders. They just need to understand the priority structure and may adjust their terms accordingly. Some lenders are perfectly fine taking a second lien position if the numbers work. The key is transparency - make sure you disclose everything you know about existing liens to your new lender upfront rather than letting them discover it during their own search.

0 coins

This is really reassuring to hear. I was worried that any existing filings would automatically kill my loan application. Good to know that being upfront about everything is the best approach - I'd rather have an honest conversation about what's there than try to hide something and have it backfire later.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

Absolutely agree with this. I've seen too many deals get messy when borrowers try to hide existing liens. Most commercial lenders have seen it all before and can work around existing security interests if the deal makes sense. The worst thing you can do is let them find something you didn't disclose - that destroys trust immediately and can torpedo even a good deal. Being transparent about your existing debt structure actually makes you look more professional and trustworthy.

0 coins

Prev1...8182838485...684Next