UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

One final tip - get everything reviewed by qualified counsel before closing. With $2.8M on the line, the legal review cost is worth it for peace of mind. They can spot issues you might miss and ensure everything complies with both UCC requirements and your state's specific rules.

0 coins

Cameron Black

•

Always good advice on big deals. Legal review catches problems before they become expensive mistakes.

0 coins

For deals this size, legal review is a must. Better safe than sorry when it comes to secured transactions.

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

Great discussion here! Just wanted to add one practical point from a recent deal - when you're dealing with multiple members in an LLC, I always request a certified copy of the member resolution authorizing the specific person to sign financing documents. Even if someone has general signing authority, having a specific resolution for the transaction provides extra protection. Also, for your $2.8M deal, consider having the signing party provide a certificate of good standing for the LLC - it's not required by the UCC but many lenders want it to confirm the entity is still validly existing at closing. Good luck with your deal!

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Excellent advice about the member resolution, Diego! I'm relatively new to secured lending but this thread has been incredibly helpful. The resolution requirement makes total sense for additional protection on larger deals. Quick question - is there a standard form for these member resolutions or does each deal require custom language? Also wondering if anyone has experience with situations where the LLC operating agreement restricts certain financing decisions and requires unanimous member consent rather than just manager authority?

0 coins

Rami Samuels

•

Update for anyone following this - I ended up using that Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier to double-check everything before filing. It caught that my debtor name on the UCC-1 didn't exactly match what was in the loan agreement (missing a comma in the LLC name). Would have probably caused problems down the road. Filed in Delaware as suggested and it went through without issues. Thanks everyone!

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

Perfect example of why it's worth taking the time to verify everything before filing. Congrats on getting it sorted out.

0 coins

Julia Hall

•

Excellent outcome. Security entitlement filings can be tricky but sounds like you nailed it.

0 coins

Sienna Gomez

•

This is such a valuable discussion! As someone new to UCC filings, I'm learning so much from everyone's experiences. One question I have - when you're dealing with multiple investment accounts at the same securities intermediary, do you need separate UCC-1 filings for each account, or can you list multiple accounts on a single filing? Also, does the timing of when you file matter in relation to when the loan closes? I want to make sure I understand the perfection timeline correctly.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

This is a great example of why document consistency is so critical in secured transactions. I've seen similar issues where the retail installment contract and security agreement had slight name variations that created confusion during the UCC filing process. As others have mentioned, always go with the official legal entity name from state records - that's your gold standard. One thing I'd add is to also check if the entity is still in good standing with the state before filing. Sometimes businesses let their registration lapse, which can complicate things. Also, make sure you're filing in the correct jurisdiction based on where the debtor is organized, not where the collateral is located. For equipment like diagnostic machines and lifts, you're definitely looking at a UCC-1 filing rather than a certificate of title situation.

0 coins

Amara Adeyemi

•

Really good point about checking if the entity is still in good standing! I had a situation once where we filed a UCC-1 on a company that had been administratively dissolved months earlier and it created a huge mess during enforcement. The secretary of state website usually shows the current status along with the exact legal name, so it's a quick check that can save major problems down the road.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

One additional consideration - if this is commercial equipment financing, you might want to verify whether the debtor has any existing UCCs filed that could create priority issues. Since you mentioned the financing was approved 3 weeks ago, time is definitely a factor for perfection. Also, when you pull the official entity records, make sure to note the entity type (LLC, Corp, etc.) and include that in your UCC-1 filing. I've seen filings rejected because the entity type was omitted or incorrect even when the name was right. The Secretary of State databases are usually pretty current, but if there's any doubt about recent name changes or amendments, you might want to call their office directly to confirm before filing.

0 coins

Dylan Hughes

•

One more tool that might help - some title companies offer UCC search services at reasonable rates if you're already working with them on the transaction. Might be worth asking if they can bundle it with other closing services.

0 coins

Yuki Watanabe

•

That's a great suggestion. We are working with a title company for some of the real estate aspects. I'll definitely ask them about UCC search services.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Title companies often have access to better search databases than what's available to the public for free. Could be a good middle-ground solution.

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

•

I've been following this thread and wanted to share my experience as someone who's done both free and paid UCC searches for acquisitions. The free Delaware system can work, but you really need to be strategic about it. I'd recommend creating a comprehensive search plan that includes: 1) All legal entity names and variations, 2) Individual guarantor names if applicable, 3) Searches in all states where the company has operations or assets, and 4) Both UCC and real estate records for fixture filings. Document everything you find and don't find - this creates a paper trail showing you did reasonable due diligence. That said, if this is a significant acquisition, the cost of a professional search service might be worth it for the peace of mind and liability coverage they often provide.

0 coins

Daniela Rossi

•

This is really comprehensive advice, thank you! The idea of documenting what I didn't find as well as what I found makes a lot of sense from a liability standpoint. I'm starting to think a hybrid approach might work best - use the free Delaware system to get a baseline understanding of what's out there, then maybe invest in professional verification for anything that looks concerning. The systematic search plan you outlined is exactly what I needed to hear.

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

Get this fixed ASAP before your refinancing. Solar panel fixture filing mistakes are super common but can create major lien priority problems. Your equipment lender should refile properly and terminate the incorrect filing.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. Calling the lender tomorrow to get this sorted out. Sounds like fixture filing is definitely the way to go.

0 coins

Good luck! Solar panel UCC issues are fixable but need to be addressed quickly.

0 coins

This is a really common issue with solar installations! I've seen this mistake dozens of times where equipment lenders treat permanently attached solar panels like regular equipment instead of fixtures. Since your panels penetrate the roof membrane, they're definitely fixtures under most state laws. The key test is whether removing them would damage the real estate - roof penetrations clearly meet that standard. You absolutely need a UCC-1 fixture filing that gets recorded in both UCC records AND real estate records to protect priority over existing and future mortgages. Contact your lender immediately to refile correctly and terminate the improper filing - time is critical since priority usually dates back to the original filing date if done quickly. Don't let this slide until your refinancing or you could have serious lien priority issues.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is really helpful - thank you for the detailed explanation! The timing aspect worries me since we've been dealing with this for a few weeks already. When you say "done quickly" for preserving the original priority date, what's the typical window? Also, should we be pushing for the fixture filing to be done before we start our refinancing process, or is it something that can be handled concurrently? I want to make sure we don't create any complications with our mortgage lender.

0 coins

Prev1...7677787980...684Next