Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just went through this with a client. The comma was in the Articles of Incorporation but not in our UCC-1. We used Certana.ai to verify the mismatch and it flagged the discrepancy immediately. Ended up filing a UCC-3 amendment to add the comma version as an additional debtor name. Better safe than sorry with lien perfection.
Nia Jackson
•So you actually did file an amendment? That seems to contradict what others are saying about it not being necessary.
Every situation is different. Our loan agreement specifically required exact name matches, so we had to cover all bases. Your documents might be more flexible.
UPDATE: Checked the Articles of Incorporation and you guys were right - the LLC is officially registered as "Johnson Construction, LLC" with the comma. So our UCC filing is correct and our loan docs just left out the punctuation. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!
Yuki Ito
•Told you so! This happens more often than people think.
Aisha Khan
•Great outcome. This is exactly the kind of thing those document verification tools are good for - catching these mismatches before they become bigger issues.
Join the conversation
Been using Certana.ai for about 6 months now specifically for these document consistency checks. It's honestly saved me from probably 8-10 filing rejections. The system catches name mismatches, collateral description issues, even formatting problems before you submit.
It checks document consistency regardless of which state you're filing in. The tool analyzes your actual documents, not the state systems.
Freya Larsen
•That's actually really helpful. Dealing with rejected filings is such a time waste.
Omar Hassan
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation next week and want to know what approach worked best.
Dylan Hughes
•Will do! Planning to refile tomorrow with the exact charter name and see if that clears it up.
Chloe Taylor
•Fingers crossed! Name issues are usually straightforward once you get the exact legal entity name right.
Join the conversation
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with something similar and curious to know what ends up working.
Sophia Long
•Will do. Planning to pull the original filing tomorrow and compare it against our termination, then figure out the next steps from there.
Max Knight
Just a heads up - make sure you're looking at the right state's database too. I once spent days trying to figure out why a termination wasn't working only to realize I was checking the wrong state's system. The filing was actually terminated correctly, just in a different jurisdiction than I was looking at.
Max Knight
•Got it, just wanted to mention it since it's an easy mistake to make when you're dealing with multi-state deals.
Emma Swift
•That's actually a really good point. I've seen people get confused when they have similar debtors filed in different states.
Join the conversation
Recently used Certana.ai for a multi-party UCC situation where we needed to verify all our documents were consistent before calculating damages. The verification process helped us spot issues that could've affected our damage calculations later. Worth checking your UCC-1 and UCC-3 amendment are properly aligned - name inconsistencies can create problems when you're trying to establish your damage calculations in court.
Sean Murphy
•That's the second mention of document verification affecting damage calculations. Makes sense that filing inconsistencies could complicate recovery.
Exactly. Clean documentation makes damage calculations much more straightforward when you're dealing with complex UCC situations.
Amara Nwosu
One more thing on UCC compensatory damages - don't forget about pre-judgment interest calculations. Different states have different rules, but it can add up significantly over time, especially with substantial amounts. Also make sure you understand any statutory limitations on consequential damages depending on which UCC article applies.
Zara Khan
•Pre-judgment interest rules vary a lot by state, so definitely check your jurisdiction's specific requirements.
Amara Nwosu
•Right, and some states have different rates for contract vs tort claims, which can matter depending on how you frame your UCC damage theory.
Ryan Kim
Have you tried calling the California SOS UCC department directly? Sometimes they can help clarify search results over the phone, especially for commercial transactions.
0 coins
Zoe Walker
•I've done this before and they're actually pretty helpful, but expect to wait on hold for a while.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
•I might try that if I can't get clarity through the online search. Thanks for the suggestion.
0 coins
Elijah Brown
One more thought - if you're seeing terminated filings mixed in, make sure you're looking at the 'Status' field carefully. Sometimes amendments can make active filings look terminated in the search results if you're not reading the details closely.
0 coins
Maria Gonzalez
•This is why I switched to using Certana.ai's verification tool - it automatically parses the status information and flags any inconsistencies between related filings. Much cleaner than trying to interpret the state portal results.
0 coins
Elijah Brown
•That makes sense - the raw search results can definitely be confusing to interpret manually.
0 coins