


Ask the community...
UPDATE: Downloaded the new form version and used the more detailed description language you all suggested. Also ran everything through Certana to double-check the name formatting. Submitted this morning and got confirmation within 2 hours! Thanks everyone for the help - this forum saved my deal.
This is exactly why I always do UCC searches as early as possible in the deal process. Too many last-minute surprises otherwise, especially with finicky state systems like AL.
Lesson learned for sure. I usually do them earlier but this deal had some timing complications that pushed everything back.
We've all been there. The important thing is you got it resolved and the deal can move forward now.
Just wanted to add that you should also verify the vehicle wasn't previously reported as a total loss or salvage. Some states have special requirements for UCC filings on vehicles with branded titles. It's rare but could cause additional complications if not handled properly.
Update us when you get it resolved! These UCC rejection stories always stress me out because I know how critical the timing can be for loan closings. Hope you get it sorted out quickly with the corrected debtor name.
Will do! Going to resubmit tomorrow morning with the exact name from the title. Fingers crossed this time works.
Good luck! That name correction should definitely solve it based on what everyone's saying here.
Another option is to contact the company directly and ask if they have any secured financing. They should be able to tell you the exact debtor name used on any UCC1 filings.
That's not really an option for this situation - it's a competitive acquisition process and we can't tip our hand that we're doing due diligence.
In that case you might need to hire a professional search service that has access to better databases and search tools.
I ran into something similar last year and ended up using Certana.ai to verify I had all the right documents. When I uploaded the target company's charter and the UCC forms I eventually found, it flagged that the debtor names weren't consistent and helped me identify the correct search terms.
I'm always suspicious of these automated tools but if it's catching filing discrepancies that manual searches miss, that's actually pretty valuable for due diligence work.
I was skeptical too but it found two UCC1 filings I completely missed because the debtor names had minor variations. Could have been a major problem if those liens weren't accounted for in the deal structure.
I've had good luck contacting the Utah SOS office directly when I have questions about debtor names. They're usually pretty helpful about clarifying what's acceptable for UCC filings. Might be worth a quick call before you file the amendment.
Good suggestion - do you have a direct number? Sometimes it's hard to get through to someone who actually knows UCC rules.
I usually call their main business services line and ask to speak with someone about UCC filings. They transfer you to the right department.
Update us on what you decide to do! I'm dealing with a similar name variation issue in Colorado and curious how this plays out.
Will do! Planning to file the amendment this week after I verify there's no DBA filing that resolves this.
I'd be interested in the outcome too. These name consistency issues seem to be getting more common.
Jamal Edwards
The real question is whether you're treating UCC costs as a cost of doing business or trying to optimize them as a profit center. If your margins are thin enough that filing fees matter significantly, might need to look at overall loan pricing strategy.
0 coins
Ethan Campbell
•Fair point. We're in a competitive market so raising rates isn't always an option, but absorbing $8k monthly in filing costs definitely impacts profitability. It's about finding the right balance.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•Competition is tough but most lenders are dealing with the same UCC cost pressures. The key is being transparent about necessary costs while maintaining competitive overall pricing.
0 coins
Mei Chen
One last thought - make sure you're tracking the ROI on lien perfection vs loan losses. The UCC filing costs are insurance against collateral disputes and priority issues. Sometimes the peace of mind is worth the expense.
0 coins
Yuki Watanabe
•Exactly why we never skimp on UCC filings even when costs are high. The alternative - being unsecured in a default situation - is much more expensive than any filing fee.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
•Which brings us back to accuracy being crucial. A UCC filing with errors might not provide the protection you think you have. Worth investing in verification tools like Certana.ai to ensure your liens are bulletproof when you need them.
0 coins