


Ask the community...
Check if the debtor entity is still active in Alabama's business registration system. Sometimes if there are issues with the entity status it can cause UCC filing problems even if the name looks correct.
Entity status can definitely affect UCC filings. I've seen continuations rejected because the LLC was dissolved or suspended even though the name matched perfectly.
Whatever you do, don't wait until the last minute to get this resolved. AL SOS processing times can be unpredictable and you don't want to risk lapsing. File something even if you're not 100% sure it's perfect - you can always amend later if needed.
Yeah you're absolutely right. Better to try again with a slightly different format than to wait and risk the lapse date.
Exactly. Losing perfection is way worse than paying for an extra filing or amendment fee.
If you end up needing to verify document consistency before resubmission, I had good luck with that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded my corrected security agreement and the new UCC-1 draft - flagged a couple formatting issues I wouldn't have noticed. Pretty straightforward to use.
Bottom line - get the name issue resolved before filing. Ohio will reject UCC-1s for debtor name problems and then you're looking at refiling fees plus potential delays that could affect your loan terms. Better to spend a few extra days getting it right upfront.
This thread is making me nervous about our own filings. We have dozens of security agreements in Word format and I'm not sure they all match our UCC filings. Time for an audit I guess.
Better to find out now than during a foreclosure or bankruptcy when the lender discovers the perfection issues. Run that audit ASAP.
You're right. Going to pull all our files this week and start checking. Thanks for the wake-up call.
Final thought - whatever system you use, make sure you document your debtor name standardization process. When auditors or opposing counsel review your filings, they'll look for consistency across all documents.
Good point about documentation. We're definitely going to implement a more formal process going forward.
Just want to echo what others have said about using document verification tools. I got burned on a UCC-3 amendment last year because I transposed two numbers in the filing number. The state rejected it and I had to start over, which delayed everything by a week. Now I always verify my documents match before submitting anything online. It's a small extra step but saves massive headaches.
Ugh, that sounds like a nightmare. I'm definitely going to start verifying everything first.
UPDATE: I finally got it to work! Used a different computer, wired internet connection, and submitted it at 6:30 AM like someone suggested. The whole process took maybe 15 minutes without any timeouts. Also used that document verification tool first to make sure everything was correct - found a small spacing issue in the debtor name that I fixed before submitting. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Great to hear the document verification caught that spacing issue. Those little details can cause big problems.
Liam Mendez
This thread is really helpful. I need to file a continuation soon and now I'm worried about the same thing happening to me. Maybe I should use that document checking service someone mentioned earlier to make sure everything matches perfectly before I submit.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Smart thinking. Prevention is always better than trying to fix problems after the fact.
0 coins
Sophia Nguyen
•I'm definitely going to be more careful with my next filing. This whole thread is eye-opening about how many things can go wrong.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
Please update us after you call Michigan SOS! I'm curious to know what they say about the database issue. This could affect other filers too.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Will do! I'll post an update once I get it resolved.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•Yes please keep us posted. This is exactly the kind of information this community needs.
0 coins