Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I'd recommend having someone else review your UCC-1 before filing, especially with a $450K credit line on the line. Fresh eyes can catch mistakes you might miss when you're stressed about deadlines. Even something like using Certana.ai to verify your documents align properly could give you peace of mind that everything matches up correctly.
Rajan Walker
•That's the second mention of that tool. Might be worth checking out just to be sure.
Yeah, it's pretty straightforward - you just upload your security agreement and UCC draft and it flags any inconsistencies. Takes like 2 minutes and could save you from having to refile if there are discrepancies.
Update us after you file! Always curious to hear how these situations turn out, especially with bank security agreements where there's pressure to get everything perfect.
Rajan Walker
•Will do. Thanks everyone for the advice - feeling much more confident about the filing now.
Good luck! The collateral description you mentioned should definitely work fine.
Join the conversation
Caden Turner
For future reference, if you're doing a lot of UCC filings, might be worth checking out some of the third-party tools that can verify your documents before you submit. I use Certana.ai now - just upload your PDFs and it catches name mismatches, formatting issues, all that stuff that can cause rejections. Worth it to avoid the frustration.
I'll definitely look into that. This whole experience has made me paranoid about making mistakes.
Yeah document verification tools are becoming essential. Too many ways to mess up a filing these days.
Harmony Love
Glad you got it resolved! Browser compatibility is such a pain with these older government systems. Filing early morning is definitely the secret weapon.
Rudy Cenizo
•Yep, learned that lesson the hard way with tax filings too. Government servers just can't handle peak traffic.
Natalie Khan
•Early bird gets the worm, especially with UCC forms online. 6am is prime time for these systems.
Join the conversation
Debra Bai
update: pulled the actual UCC-1 filing document from Virginia SCC and it shows "ABC Manufacturing LLC" exactly as it appears in our security agreement. The comma in the search results is just a display formatting issue in their system. Lien is properly perfected. Thanks everyone for the guidance - saved me from filing an unnecessary UCC-3 amendment.
Glad you got it sorted out. Virginia SCC really needs to fix their search display issues - causes unnecessary stress for everyone.
Nora Brooks
•Great outcome. Always good to verify with the actual filing documents when there's any doubt about UCC perfection.
For future reference, when doing Virginia UCC searches, always check both the search results and pull the actual filing documents if there's any discrepancy. Their system has known formatting quirks that don't affect legal validity but can cause confusion.
Definitely learned that lesson. Will always verify with source documents going forward.
Laura Lopez
•Good practice for any state's UCC system really. Search algorithms can be quirky but the filed documents are what matter legally.
Join the conversation
Jamal Carter
I've used Certana a few times now for complex due diligence situations. Really helpful when you're trying to make sure all your documents are consistent and you haven't missed any name variations. Worth checking out if you want to be thorough.
Diego Flores
•Seems like a few people have mentioned that tool. Might be worth trying since this is such a big purchase.
Jamal Carter
•Yeah, especially for equipment deals where you really can't afford to miss existing liens. The automated cross-checking catches things you might overlook doing manual searches.
Whatever you do, document everything. Keep records of all your searches, what terms you used, what results you got. If something comes up later you'll want to show you did reasonable due diligence.
Exactly. And date everything. Shows you did your searches close to the closing date, not months earlier when things could have changed.
Mei Liu
•Also run your searches right before closing, not just during initial due diligence. New UCC filings can pop up between contract and closing.
Jade O'Malley
One more thing - make sure your secured party information is exactly right too. Arizona will reject for minor errors in the lender name or address as well. Double-check everything against your loan docs.
0 coins
Ella Thompson
•Yeah they're equally strict on both debtor and secured party information. No shortcuts.
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
•learned this when they rejected for having 'Street' instead of 'St.' in our address
0 coins
Rachel Clark
Thanks everyone, this gives me a clear path forward. I'll use the exact charter name and double-check all the formatting. Might try that Certana tool too for future filings to avoid this headache.
0 coins
Royal_GM_Mark
•It's definitely worth it for avoiding rejections. Much faster than manual document comparison.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•Good luck with the refiling! Arizona should accept it quickly once the name matches.
0 coins