UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Tyler Lefleur

•

Just had another thought - since you mentioned this is construction equipment, make sure your collateral description is broad enough to cover any attachments or accessories that might get added to the machinery during the project. Sometimes borrowers add specialized attachments that could be considered separate collateral.

0 coins

Exactly. Construction equipment tends to get modified and upgraded during its working life. You want to make sure your security interest covers everything.

0 coins

Max Knight

•

I learned this lesson when a borrower added a $50k attachment to an excavator and we hadn't covered accessories in our original UCC. Had to file an amendment to pick up the new collateral.

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

Sounds like you've got your answer on Delaware filing. One last piece of advice - keep copies of everything including the search results showing your filing was accepted. Sometimes you need to prove perfection timing later and having the documentation makes it much easier.

0 coins

Definitely will do. Thanks everyone for the help - feeling much more confident about getting this filed correctly now.

0 coins

Good luck with the filing! Delaware should be straightforward for this type of deal.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

One more thing to consider - make sure your UCC-1 filing covers all the collateral adequately but doesn't inadvertently include contractual obligations that don't create security interests. I've seen deals where over-broad collateral descriptions created confusion later during audits or when trying to release specific assets.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

Right, precision in collateral descriptions saves headaches down the road, especially if you need to do partial releases or amendments later.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

I learned this the hard way when I had to file multiple UCC-3 amendments to clarify what was actually secured versus what was just referenced in the original filing.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Thanks everyone for all the insights! This has really helped clarify the distinction between what needs UCC filing versus what stays under general contract law. I think I'll separate the equipment security agreement from the service contracts and focus my UCC-1 filing on the tangible assets while keeping the service obligations as standard contractual terms.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

That sounds like a solid approach. Just make sure your attorney reviews the final structure to confirm everything is properly covered.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

Good plan. The separation approach has worked well for me in similar situations.

0 coins

UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice. I ended up filing a UCC-3 amendment with the correct debtor name including the comma. It was accepted within 24 hours and now I can sleep at night knowing our security interest is properly perfected. Total cost was $185 which is nothing compared to the peace of mind. For anyone facing similar issues, don't second-guess yourself - just file the amendment.

0 coins

Smart move. $185 is pocket change compared to a $2.8M unsecured exposure.

0 coins

Ella Harper

•

This thread convinced me to double-check all our recent UCC filings. Found two potential name issues that need amendments. Better to catch them now than later.

0 coins

PrinceJoe

•

For future reference, most state UCC filing offices have guidelines about acceptable name variations posted on their websites. Some states publish lists of abbreviations that are considered equivalent (Corp/Corporation, Inc/Incorporated, etc.). Worth checking before filing to avoid these issues altogether.

0 coins

Owen Devar

•

Those guidelines can be hard to find sometimes. Would be nice if they were more prominent on the filing portals.

0 coins

Daniel Rivera

•

Even with guidelines, I still prefer to use the exact charter name. Eliminates any doubt about compliance.

0 coins

Oliver Weber

•

The original poster's situation with 'ABC Equipment LLC' vs 'ABC Equipment, LLC' is actually a perfect example of why automated document checking is so valuable. I was manually reviewing charter docs against UCC forms for years until I found Certana.ai - now I just upload the PDFs and it instantly flags any name discrepancies. Would have saved me so much time and stress if I'd had it when I started doing UCC work. These tiny punctuation differences can void your entire security interest if you're not careful.

0 coins

FireflyDreams

•

Does it work with scanned documents or only digital PDFs? A lot of our charter docs are older scanned copies.

0 coins

Most document analysis tools can handle scanned PDFs as long as the text is readable. OCR technology has gotten pretty good.

0 coins

Bottom line for the OP - you need to get this name issue sorted out ASAP. If your security interest isn't properly perfected because of the name mismatch, you could lose priority to other creditors or even lose your security entirely. I'd recommend: 1) Pull the official charter documents for the debtor, 2) Compare them to your existing UCC-1 filing, 3) File UCC-3 amendments to correct any name discrepancies, and 4) Going forward, always double-check debtor names before filing. This kind of mistake is exactly why many lenders are moving to automated document verification tools.

0 coins

The automated verification approach makes sense. Manual comparison is error-prone and time consuming, especially with complex multi-party transactions.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Thanks everyone, this has been super helpful. Going to pull the official LLC docs and get the name corrected on our filings. Definitely going to look into that document verification tool too - sounds like it could prevent these headaches in the future.

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

Don't forget to check if your state requires specific forms for continuation filings. Some states have their own UCC-3 forms with specific formatting requirements, while others accept the standard forms. Using the wrong form can cause delays or rejections.

0 coins

Each state seems to have their own quirks with UCC filings. I keep a checklist for each state I file in because the requirements can be so different.

0 coins

Sean O'Brien

•

The fee schedules are different too. Some states charge per page, others have flat fees. Budget accordingly, especially if you need multiple amendments.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

Bottom line: Don't listen to your loan officer on this one. File the continuation before expiration, deal with the name change issue properly, and give yourself plenty of time to handle any complications. Losing perfection on a $280K loan is not worth the risk of waiting or doing it wrong.

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

Smart move. UCC filings are too important to leave to chance, especially with larger loans. Take the time to do it right.

0 coins

Good luck! Come back and let us know how it goes. These continuation situations with name changes can be tricky but definitely manageable if you plan ahead.

0 coins

Prev1...557558559560561...684Next