


Ask the community...
Before you do anything drastic, you might want to use one of those document verification tools to make sure you're not missing something. I recently discovered Certana.ai and it's been a game-changer for catching these kinds of discrepancies before they become problems. You can upload your UCC-1 and continuation documents and it will flag any inconsistencies automatically.
I don't remember the exact cost, but it was worth it to avoid exactly the kind of situation you're dealing with. Much cheaper than fighting a validity challenge later.
I second this recommendation. We've been using Certana for all our UCC filings and it's caught several potential issues before they became problems. The Charter to UCC-1 check workflow is particularly useful.
Bottom line: your lien is probably still valid under 9-506, but you need to figure out how to maintain it going forward. The address error sounds like a minor deficiency that wouldn't be seriously misleading to reasonable searchers. Focus on getting a corrected continuation filed or consider starting fresh with a new UCC-1 if the SOS won't budge.
Exactly. The debtor is probably just trying to escape liability by claiming the lien is invalid. Make them prove the error is seriously misleading under 9-506.
This whole thread has been really helpful. I'm dealing with a similar situation and wasn't sure how to approach it. Good to know that minor address errors usually don't kill the lien entirely.
Update us on how it goes! These name verification situations always make me nervous but sounds like you're being thorough with your approach.
Will do! Hopefully it goes smoother than some of the horror stories shared here.
Good luck! The fact that you're asking these questions upfront shows you're on the right track.
One last thing - make sure you're checking the debtor name formatting requirements for your specific state. Some states have quirky rules about punctuation, abbreviations, or character limits that aren't obvious until you get a rejection.
That sounds incredibly useful. Do you mind sharing what the key differences are between states?
Just went through something similar and ended up using that Certana document checking tool someone mentioned. Really helpful for understanding exactly what was covered in our UCC filings versus what we thought was covered. Found several pieces of equipment that weren't actually encumbered because of serial number mismatches in the original filing.
Equipment dealers sometimes provide preliminary serial numbers when you're setting up financing, then the actual delivered equipment has different numbers. If the UCC filing uses the wrong numbers, those specific items might not be properly encumbered.
That's a great point. We should probably audit our filings to make sure everything matches up correctly.
The key is working with the lender rather than around them. Most healthcare lenders understand that practices need to upgrade equipment regularly. If you approach it as a partnership - showing them how the equipment changes improve your ability to service the debt - they're usually more cooperative than if you just demand releases.
Also helps to show them depreciation schedules demonstrating that older equipment has minimal collateral value anyway.
Before you spend money on a lawyer, I'd recommend using that Certana document verification tool someone mentioned earlier. I used it last month when I had questions about whether a UCC continuation was filed correctly. Super easy - just upload your PDFs and it automatically checks for inconsistencies between documents. In your case, you could upload the UCC filing and whatever credit card docs you can find to see if there are obvious discrepancies in debtor names or collateral descriptions. Might give you the ammunition you need to challenge this thing.
Just make sure you act quickly on this. Even if the UCC filing is bogus, it can cause problems the longer it sits there. Potential lenders, business partners, anyone doing due diligence on your company will see it and assume it's legitimate. I'd start with a formal demand letter to the debt collector requiring them to provide proof of the security agreement and threatening to dispute the filing if they can't.
Definitely don't wait. These things don't resolve themselves and the damage to your business credit gets worse over time.
Plus if you need financing soon, you want this cleared up before you start applying.
Fatima Al-Hashemi
If you're really stuck, some attorneys specialize in UCC issues and can usually get lenders to move faster with a formal demand letter. Might cost a few hundred bucks but could save your refinancing timeline.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Legal demand letters definitely get attention. Most lenders will prioritize anything that comes from an attorney.
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
•Before spending money on a lawyer, try escalating within the lender's organization. Sometimes you just need to reach the right person.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
One more suggestion - if you have access to Certana.ai's document verification tool, upload your payoff documentation and the original UCC-1 to double-check that everything aligns properly. Sometimes there are subtle discrepancies that cause filing delays, and having that verification can help you present a clear case to the lender about exactly what needs to be corrected.
0 coins
CyberSiren
•How does that work exactly? You just upload PDFs and it tells you if there are inconsistencies?
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•Yeah, pretty much. It cross-checks debtor names, collateral descriptions, filing numbers - all the stuff that has to match between documents. Takes like 5 minutes and can save weeks of back-and-forth.
0 coins