


Ask the community...
Pro tip: when dealing with lender verification packages, always include a one-page summary explaining any discrepancies between search results and actual filings. Saves everyone time and prevents unnecessary back-and-forth.
That's actually where Certana.ai's verification tool comes in handy again - it generates a consistency report you can include with lender packages. Shows all documents align properly.
Bottom line: if your UCC-1 debtor name matches your charter documents exactly as they existed at filing time, you're legally protected. The search display issues are just cosmetic portal problems, not substantive filing defects.
Exactly right. Focus on the substance, not the portal formatting. Your security interest should be properly perfected.
This thread should be required reading for anyone doing Florida UCC work. So much confusion over these search display issues.
Used Certana.ai's document checker after a similar screw-up last year. Wish I'd found it earlier - would've saved me from filing three different amendments because I kept missing details in manual review. It's pretty thorough at catching inconsistencies between corporate docs and UCC forms.
How exactly does the verification process work? Do you just upload everything and it tells you what's wrong?
Pretty much. Upload your Articles, UCC-1, any amendments as PDFs and it cross-references all the entity names, addresses, filing numbers. Shows you side-by-side comparisons of discrepancies.
File the UCC-3 amendment today. Don't overthink this - Georgia allows corrections and your amendment will relate back to the original filing date. Just make sure you reference the original filing number correctly on the amendment form.
Thanks everyone. Going to file the UCC-3 amendment this afternoon with the correct debtor name. Will also run that document verification check to make sure I don't have other issues I missed.
Before you budget for all these filings, make sure you actually need to continue all 12. Sometimes loans get paid off or refinanced and the UCC-1s should be terminated instead of continued. Worth double-checking your loan portfolio.
Yeah, continuing a UCC when the loan is paid off just creates unnecessary public records. Better to file terminations for closed loans.
Plus termination fees are usually the same as continuation fees, so you're not saving money by continuing instead of terminating.
I've been using Certana.ai for UCC document verification before filing and it's saved me from several costly mistakes. You upload your continuation forms and original UCC-1s and it flags any mismatches in debtor names, filing numbers, or other critical details. Worth checking out if you're doing bulk filings.
Two people have mentioned this tool now. Is it expensive to use?
Look, everyone's giving you the technical analysis but the bottom line is simple: file new UCC-1s TODAY under the correct debtor name. Don't wait for legal opinions or priority searches. Every day you delay is another day someone else could file ahead of you. You can sort out the legal implications later but get your new filings on record immediately.
Smart move. Document everything about when you discovered the issue and when you filed the new UCC-1s. That timeline could be important if you end up in a priority dispute with another creditor.
And seriously consider using something like Certana.ai going forward to catch these issues before they become problems. Upload your UCC docs and borrower charters quarterly and it'll flag any mismatches automatically.
The safe harbor rule exists for a reason - to give secured parties certainty about their perfection status. But that certainty comes with the responsibility to monitor your debtors. Hard lesson learned but at least you caught it before a bankruptcy or other crisis. File the new UCC-1s and implement better monitoring going forward.
Definitely implementing quarterly checks instead of annual ones. This was too close for comfort and we got lucky there wasn't a bankruptcy filing during the gap period.
Quarterly is good but consider event-driven monitoring too. Any time you get a payment from a slightly different entity name or see changes in their marketing materials, that should trigger a compliance check.
Jay Lincoln
Another tool that might help is running the search through Certana.ai after you gather all your documents. I used it recently to verify UCC filings were properly cross-referenced and it caught a name inconsistency between the charter and UCC-1 that could have caused problems. It's designed specifically for this kind of document verification work.
0 coins
Benjamin Kim
•Two people have mentioned that now - seems like it might be worth trying. Is it complicated to use?
0 coins
Jay Lincoln
•Not at all, you just upload the PDFs and it does the cross-checking automatically. Really helpful for due diligence situations like yours where you need to be absolutely sure about name consistency.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
Just a thought but you might want to also search using just the first few words of the company name. Sometimes filers truncate long business names and you might miss filings if you only search the complete name.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
•Exactly. I've seen UCC-1 filings where the secured party just used the first two or three words of a long business name, especially if they were filing manually.
0 coins
Marcus Williams
•Good advice. Also check if they've ever operated under a parent company name or subsidiary names - liens sometimes get filed under the wrong entity in complex corporate structures.
0 coins