Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Ethan Clark
Update us when you get it filed! I'm curious how it goes since I might need to do something similar soon. These equipment financing situations are getting more common with all the economic uncertainty.
Carmen Vega
Just wanted to echo what others said about using the exact legal entity name. I once had a UCC-1 rejected because I used "Inc." instead of "Incorporated" in the debtor name. The systems are very picky about exact matches to state records.
That's ridiculous but totally believable. The whole system needs to be more forgiving of minor variations.
Zoe Stavros
•At least most states show you the exact format when you do a business name search. That helps avoid those kinds of mistakes.
Join the conversation
Another tool I've found helpful is using Certana.ai to verify document consistency before doing searches. When I upload my Charter and UCC-1 docs, it catches name variations I might have missed. Makes the basic UCC filing search much more effective when you know exactly what to look for.
I should probably be doing this kind of verification more systematically. I just search and hope for the best usually.
Yeah it's definitely worth the extra step. Saves a lot of frustration later when you can't find something.
Yara Nassar
The key is to be systematic about it. I keep a checklist of search variations for each state: exact name, name without entity type, name with different punctuation, secured party name, filing number, and filing date range. Basic UCC filing search is tedious but you need to be thorough.
Paolo Ricci
•Do you have a template for that checklist? That would be super helpful to share.
Yara Nassar
•I could probably put together a basic template. It's mostly just remembering to try all the variations systematically rather than randomly.
Join the conversation
The security agreement meaning really comes down to this: it's the document that gives the lender rights in your collateral if you default. Everything else - payment terms, insurance, maintenance requirements - is just additional loan conditions. For your equipment financing, focus on making sure the collateral description is accurate and the granting language is clear. The UCC-1 filing then makes that security interest effective against third parties.
Yara Abboud
•This helps clarify things. So the security agreement is really the 'why' and the UCC-1 is the 'how' of perfection?
That's a good way to think about it. Security agreement creates the rights, UCC-1 filing protects those rights against other creditors.
Just went through this exact process for CNC equipment financing. Make sure your security agreement includes proper default cure periods and notice requirements. Some lenders try to include hair-trigger default provisions that can cause problems if you miss a payment by a day or two. The security agreement meaning includes protecting your rights as debtor, not just giving rights to the secured party.
Usually 10-30 days depending on the lender and deal size. Make sure you negotiate something workable for your cash flow cycle.
Sean Kelly
•Also make sure the default definition isn't too broad. Some agreements include 'material adverse change' clauses that are way too subjective.
Join the conversation
Just went through something similar in NJ. The key is getting certified copies of ALL the UCC filings, not just relying on search results. I found two filings that had been terminated but the terminations weren't showing up in the basic search. Also found that one of the "active" liens was actually invalid due to an incorrect debtor name that didn't match the business registration. Saved me from a major priority dispute.
Exactly. Pulled the Articles of Incorporation and all amendments from NJ Division of Revenue, then compared against the exact debtor names on each UCC filing. One filing had a name that was never legally registered, making it invalid.
Ayla Kumar
•This is why I always run a comprehensive entity verification before relying on UCC search results. The databases don't always sync properly and you can miss critical details about entity status or name changes.
Update us when you get this sorted out! Dealing with NJ UCC searches myself on a deal next month and curious how you resolve the conflicting search results. Always helpful to know what works and what doesn't with their system.
Will definitely post an update once I get the certified copies and sort through everything. Hoping to have clarity by end of week so we can still close on schedule.
Good luck! NJ can be a pain but at least their certified copy process is relatively fast compared to some other states.
Ethan Brown
Update: I ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned and it found two UCC-1 filings I had completely missed! One was filed under a name variation with different punctuation and another was filed under their old DBA name. Both were still active and would have been senior to our lien. Thanks for the suggestion - probably saved me from a major problem.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•That's a relief! Good thing you found those before closing. Senior liens can completely change the risk profile.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•Wait that was you who suggested Certana? Thank you so much - that literally saved my deal. I never would have found those filings otherwise.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
This is why I always recommend doing comprehensive lien searches through multiple methods. The online portals miss too much stuff to rely on them alone for critical transactions.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•Agreed. I always tell people to use every search method available and cross-check everything.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•The stakes are too high to trust a single search method. Especially with large commercial deals.
0 coins