UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Oliver Schulz

How to file a UCC lien properly - debtor name requirements?

I'm setting up secured financing for equipment purchases and need to understand the correct process for how to file a UCC lien. My bank is requiring UCC-1 filings but I'm getting conflicting information about debtor name requirements. The borrower is an LLC that recently changed their registered name with the state, and I'm worried about getting the debtor name wrong and invalidating the security interest. Do I use the exact name from their articles of incorporation or the DBA they operate under? Also confused about whether I need to file in their state of incorporation or where the equipment will be located. Any guidance on the proper steps would be really helpful since this is my first time handling UCC filings directly.

Luca Romano

•

Don't forget to calendar your continuation deadline! UCC-1 filings lapse after 5 years unless you file a UCC-3 continuation. Set a reminder for at least 6 months before expiration to avoid scrambling at the last minute.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Right - and if you miss the deadline, you have to start over with a new UCC-1 filing and lose your original priority date.

0 coins

Some lenders use automated systems to track continuation deadlines, but it's still good practice to keep your own calendar.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

Just to close the loop - sounds like you're on the right track with getting the exact legal name and filing in the state of organization. Take your time with the debtor name verification since that's where most problems occur. Good luck with your filing!

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Thanks everyone - really helpful guidance. I'll definitely verify the name carefully before submitting.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

Smart approach - better to be overly careful with UCC filings than deal with invalid security interests later.

0 coins

Chloe Green

UCC1 filing Colorado - debtor name rejected twice need help

Been trying to get this UCC1 filing through Colorado SOS for three weeks now and getting rejection notices both times. The debtor company changed their registered name last year from 'Mountain View Equipment LLC' to 'Mountain View Equipment & Leasing LLC' but their tax ID stayed the same. I filed using the new name from their articles of amendment but SOS keeps rejecting saying debtor name doesn't match their records. Called the help desk twice and got different answers each time - first person said use exact name from Secretary of State database, second person said use name from loan documents. Equipment loan is for $275,000 worth of construction machinery and we need this perfected ASAP. Anyone dealt with Colorado name matching issues like this? Starting to think their system has a bug or something because the company name shows up correctly when I search their business registry.

Ryan Young

•

Update us when you get it figured out! Always helpful to know what worked for Colorado filings since they seem to be getting pickier.

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

Will definitely post an update once I get through. Hopefully tomorrow's attempt works.

0 coins

Caden Nguyen

•

Looking forward to hearing what solved it. Could help others with similar issues.

0 coins

Aaron Lee

•

Just a thought - have you tried using Certana.ai's verification tool? I've seen a few people mention it in this thread and it might catch whatever formatting issue is causing the rejections. Worth a shot before submission attempt number three.

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

Yeah I'm definitely going to check that out. Seems like several people have had success with it.

0 coins

Avery Flores

•

It really does help catch those small details that cause rejections. Upload your draft UCC1 and the company docs and it'll flag any mismatches.

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

New York Secretary of State UCC search showing my continuation as rejected - need help ASAP

I'm panicking here. Did a New York Secretary of State UCC search this morning and my UCC-3 continuation that I filed 3 weeks ago is showing as REJECTED. The original UCC-1 was filed 4.5 years ago for equipment financing on manufacturing equipment, and I thought I had plenty of time before the 5-year lapse. The rejection reason says 'debtor name mismatch' but I copied the exact name from the original filing. My lender is going to flip when they find out their security interest might lapse. Has anyone dealt with NY SOS rejecting continuations for name issues? I double-checked everything before filing and the debtor name looked identical to me. Is there any way to fix this quickly or am I looking at having to refile everything from scratch? The equipment loan is for $2.8M so this isn't a small mistake.

Update us when you figure out the exact reason for rejection! These kinds of posts help everyone learn what to watch out for. NY SOS rejections are so frustrating because their rejection notices are usually vague.

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

•

Will do. Going to check for entity name changes first, then use that verification tool someone mentioned to compare the documents character by character.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Looking forward to hearing what it was. These name mismatch rejections are becoming way too common.

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

•

Just a thought - if this is urgent and you're worried about the lapse deadline, you might want to have your attorney refile it while you're troubleshooting. Better to have a duplicate filing fee than risk losing perfection on a $2.8M loan.

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

•

You're right. I'm going to start the corrected refiling process today rather than wait to figure out every detail of what went wrong.

0 coins

Jamal Edwards

•

Definitely the safe approach. You can always amend or terminate the duplicate later if needed.

0 coins

Carmella Fromis

Connecticut UCC filing name discrepancy causing lender compliance issues

Running into a nightmare situation with a Connecticut UCC filing that's putting our entire loan agreement at risk. We've got a $850K equipment financing deal where the borrower's legal name on their articles of incorporation shows 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but their UCC-1 filing lists them as 'Advanced Mfg Solutions LLC'. The lender is now questioning whether our security interest is properly perfected since the debtor names don't match exactly. Our legal team is saying this could void the entire secured position if we can't demonstrate proper perfection. Has anyone dealt with Connecticut's Secretary of State office on debtor name discrepancies like this? The equipment involved includes CNC machinery and industrial fabrication tools, so we're talking about substantial collateral value here. Need to know if Connecticut follows the 'seriously misleading' standard or if they're stricter about exact name matches. Time is critical since we're approaching our continuation deadline and can't afford to have an unperfected security interest.

Mason Davis

•

UPDATE: Just wanted to thank everyone for the advice. I went ahead and filed the UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name to match the articles exactly. Also ran the search test under both names and our original filing did appear under both variations, which was reassuring. The lender is satisfied with the amendment and we're moving forward with the loan. Crisis averted!

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

Smart move on filing that amendment. Better to have ironclad documentation than leave any room for doubt.

0 coins

Glad it worked out. This thread has been really helpful for understanding Connecticut's approach to debtor name issues.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

This whole thread reinforces why I've started using automated verification tools for all my UCC work. I tried that Certana service someone mentioned and it's been a game changer. Uploaded a batch of documents last week and it caught three different name inconsistencies that I would have missed. Definitely worth checking out if you're doing regular UCC filings.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

I don't want to get into specific pricing here, but it's reasonable for the value you get. The peace of mind alone is worth it when you're dealing with large loan amounts.

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

Might have to give it a try. Manual document comparison is definitely my least favorite part of the filing process.

0 coins

Anastasia Fedorov

NY UCC debtor search showing weird results - filed continuation but borrower still shows lapsed?

Really confused about what I'm seeing in the NY UCC debtor search system. We filed a UCC-3 continuation back in March for a client's equipment loan (filing was due in April) and got confirmation it was accepted. But when I run the debtor search now, it's still showing the original UCC-1 as lapsed? The continuation shows up as a separate entry but doesn't seem to be connecting to extend the original filing. Has anyone else seen this in NY where the debtor search doesn't properly link continuations? I'm worried we might have messed up the filing number or debtor name format somehow. The loan is for $2.8M in manufacturing equipment so we really can't afford to have this lien fall off. Client is freaking out because they ran their own search and saw the lapsed status. Any thoughts on what could be going wrong here?

Andre Dupont

•

This thread is making me realize I need to be way more careful about debtor names. I usually just type them from memory or our loan docs but clearly that's not good enough for NY. Going to start pulling the original filings for every continuation from now on.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Smart move. I learned this lesson the hard way too. Now I always copy and paste directly from the original filing rather than typing anything manually.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

Or use a document checker like Certana.ai - takes the guesswork out of it completely.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

UPDATE: Called the NY Secretary of State and they confirmed it's a debtor name mismatch issue. The comma I added on the continuation is preventing the system from linking it to the original filing. They said I need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name format. At least now I know what the problem is, but what a hassle!

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Thanks for the update. This is a good reminder for everyone about how picky NY is with debtor names. One extra comma can cause major headaches.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

So relieved you figured it out! This thread definitely taught me to be way more careful about name formatting on my upcoming continuation.

0 coins

Prev1...452453454455456...684Next