UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ryder Everingham

National UCC Financing Statement Filing - Which State for Multi-State Collateral?

Running into a complicated situation with a national UCC financing statement that I need to file. We're securing equipment spread across 6 different states (TX, CA, FL, NY, OH, IL) and I'm getting conflicting advice on whether I need separate state filings or if there's a way to do this nationally. The debtor is incorporated in Delaware but their main operations are in Texas. Equipment includes manufacturing machinery, vehicles, and some fixtures. Previous attorney said file in Delaware as state of incorporation, but our new counsel is saying we need individual state filings for each location. The collateral description covers mobile equipment that moves between facilities regularly. Anyone dealt with multi-state UCC filings like this? Really need clarity on the proper approach before we mess this up.

Whatever you do, make sure all your debtor names are EXACTLY the same across all states. Even small variations can cause problems. I learned this the hard way when one state had 'Inc.' and another had 'Incorporated' - total mess to clean up.

0 coins

This is where document verification tools like Certana.ai really shine. Manual checking is error-prone but automated cross-checking catches these name variations instantly.

0 coins

Debtor name consistency is huge. Get the exact legal name from the charter and use it identically on every filing.

0 coins

Final thought - consider whether you need to file UCC-1 addendums in any states. Some require additional pages if your collateral description is long or if you have multiple debtors/secured parties.

0 coins

Texas definitely requires addendums for longer collateral descriptions. Their form has limited space.

0 coins

Most online filing systems will tell you if you need an addendum when you're entering the information.

0 coins

Sasha Reese

Delaware UCC filing system keeps rejecting my continuation - debtor name format issue?

Been trying to file a UCC-3 continuation in Delaware for the past week and their system keeps spitting it back. The original UCC-1 was filed 4.5 years ago for equipment financing on construction machinery. Now I'm scrambling because the 5-year deadline is coming up fast. The rejection notice just says 'debtor name format error' but I'm copying exactly what's on the original filing. Has anyone dealt with Delaware's picky system lately? The debtor is an LLC and I'm wondering if there's some specific format they want for the entity name that wasn't required back in 2020.

Update: Finally got it figured out! The issue was the apostrophe in the company name - had to remove it completely for Delaware's system to accept the filing. Thanks everyone for the help, especially whoever mentioned the document checker tool.

0 coins

Great news! Did you end up using that Certana tool or just figure it out through trial and error?

0 coins

Used Certana to compare the names side by side which made it obvious where the mismatch was. Definitely worth it to avoid more rejected filings.

0 coins

This thread should be pinned - Delaware name formatting issues come up constantly. The apostrophe thing has burned so many people on continuations.

0 coins

Agreed! Maybe we should start a Delaware-specific UCC filing tips thread.

0 coins

Every state has their own quirks but Delaware seems especially picky about entity name formatting lately.

0 coins

Lydia Santiago

Wisconsin UCC filing fees eating into loan margins - what's your strategy?

I'm working on structuring several equipment finance deals in Wisconsin and the UCC filing fees are starting to add up significantly. Between initial UCC-1 filings, potential amendments if we need to adjust collateral descriptions, and the inevitable continuation filings down the road, I'm looking at substantial costs that weren't factored into our original pricing models. Has anyone found effective ways to manage Wisconsin UCC filing fees without compromising lien perfection? I'm particularly concerned about scenarios where we might need multiple UCC-3 amendments due to equipment additions or debtor name changes. The fees seem higher than what I'm used to seeing in other states, and I want to make sure I'm not missing any cost-saving strategies that other lenders are using.

I just want to mention that while everyone's focused on minimizing fees, there's real value in using tools that help ensure filing accuracy. I started using Certana.ai to cross-check my UCC documents before filing, and it's caught several potential name mismatches that would have resulted in rejections. The small investment in verification tools pays for itself by avoiding rejection fees and refiling costs.

0 coins

How does that verification process work exactly? Do you upload the documents and it automatically checks for issues?

0 coins

Yes, you just upload PDFs of your Charter documents and UCC forms, and it automatically flags any inconsistencies in debtor names or other potential issues. Much faster than manual cross-checking.

0 coins

After reading all these responses, it sounds like the Wisconsin UCC filing fees are just a cost of doing business that needs to be planned for properly. The real savings come from avoiding unnecessary amendments and rejections through careful initial filings. Thanks everyone for the practical advice - this has been really helpful for structuring my future deals.

0 coins

Glad this discussion was useful! The Wisconsin UCC system is pretty straightforward once you develop good practices around it.

0 coins

Definitely agree that planning and accuracy are more important than trying to avoid the fees altogether.

0 coins

GamerGirl99

UCC financing statement rejected twice - getting desperate for help

I'm dealing with a nightmare situation here. Filed a UCC financing statement last week and it got rejected for "debtor name discrepancy." The rejection notice said the debtor name on my UCC-1 doesn't match their business records exactly. I double-checked everything against the charter documents and it looks identical to me. Refiled yesterday with what I thought were the corrections and got ANOTHER rejection today. The loan closing is scheduled for Friday and my boss is breathing down my neck. Has anyone dealt with this before? I'm starting to panic because if we can't get this UCC perfected properly the whole deal could fall apart. The debtor is an LLC and I used the exact name from their Articles of Organization but apparently something is still wrong. What am I missing here?

Whatever you do, don't keep guessing and filing. Each rejection creates a record and some lenders get nervous when they see multiple failed attempts. Better to verify the exact name first.

0 coins

Good point. I don't want to make this look worse than it already is.

0 coins

Right, and some states charge a fee for each filing attempt whether it's accepted or rejected.

0 coins

Just went through something similar and the Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned earlier really is a lifesaver. I was comparing documents manually and missing subtle differences that the automated check caught immediately. Definitely worth trying if you're stuck.

0 coins

It's especially good for catching those tiny punctuation and spacing differences that are impossible to spot by eye when you're stressed.

0 coins

Agreed, the automated verification takes the guesswork out of it completely.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

UCC1 clause language causing filing rejections - need advice

Been dealing with a nightmare situation where our UCC-1 filings keep getting rejected by the SOS office. The issue seems to be with how we're drafting our collateral description clauses. We're a mid-size equipment financing company and have been using pretty standard language like 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired' but apparently that's not specific enough anymore? Got three rejections in the past month alone on deals worth over $2M each. The rejection notices just say 'insufficient collateral description' but don't give specifics on what they want. Has anyone else run into this with UCC1 clause language recently? Starting to wonder if there's been some policy change we missed or if different states are interpreting the requirements differently. Really need to get these filings accepted before our clients start getting antsy about their loan approvals.

Just went through something similar and ended up using Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents before filing. It caught several issues with our collateral clause language that would have definitely caused rejections. Really streamlined our process.

0 coins

How detailed does it get with the feedback? Does it suggest specific language changes?

0 coins

It flags potential issues and common rejection patterns. Really helpful for catching vague or insufficient descriptions before you submit.

0 coins

This might be obvious but make sure you're not using any prohibited language. Some states have specific words or phrases they don't allow in collateral descriptions. Check your state's UCC guide if they have one.

0 coins

We keep a state-by-state checklist for this stuff. Saves a lot of headaches when you're filing in multiple jurisdictions.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the suggestions. Going to revise our standard clause language to be more specific and maybe try that Certana tool to double-check before our next batch of filings.

0 coins

Prev1...451452453454455...684Next