


Ask the community...
Another option is to use Certana.ai's Charter to UCC-1 verification workflow. You upload the Articles of Organization from the corporation records department along with your UCC-1 form and it automatically identifies any naming inconsistencies. I've used it for several multi-state filings and it catches stuff I would have missed.
Two people have mentioned this tool now - seems like it might be worth trying. Better than doing all this manual checking.
I was skeptical at first but the document verification really does save time. Especially when you're dealing with corporation records from one state and filing UCCs in another.
Been lurking but had to comment - this thread is why I'm paranoid about UCC deadlines. Set multiple calendar reminders, backup systems, everything. The UCC 120 day rule is unforgiving and $2.8M is life-changing money.
Trust me, implement whatever backup systems you can think of. This situation is every lender's nightmare.
Update us on how the re-filing process goes. Would be helpful to know what challenges you run into with debtor cooperation and whether any equipment issues arise. Good luck with the cleanup.
Will definitely post an update once we work through this mess. Hopefully it helps others avoid the same mistakes.
Please do - these real-world examples are invaluable for understanding UCC compliance challenges.
One more tip - if you find existing liens, make sure you understand the lien priority before advising your client. NJ follows the standard first-to-file rule but there can be exceptions for PMSI and other specialized security interests.
Quick question - are you familiar with NJ's continuation requirements? If you find liens that are close to their 5-year expiration, it might affect the timing of your transaction.
One more consideration - make sure you understand InfoUSA's update frequency. Some lead services only refresh their UCC data monthly or quarterly, which means you could be working with information that's weeks or months old by the time you get it.
Good reminder! We always ask about data refresh cycles when evaluating these services. Daily updates are ideal but even weekly can be acceptable depending on your use case.
The refresh frequency definitely matters especially for time-sensitive opportunities like continuation deadlines or recent terminations.
For what it's worth, we've had decent success using InfoUSA UCC leads as part of a broader prospecting strategy rather than relying on them exclusively. Combined with other research methods and proper verification, they can add value to your pipeline development.
That's probably the right way to think about it - one piece of the puzzle rather than the whole solution.
Exactly. And tools like Certana.ai help bridge the gap by letting you verify the lead data against actual UCC documents before you invest time in outreach.
Miguel Herrera
Just went through something similar but used one of those document verification tools someone mentioned earlier. Certana.ai I think? Anyway, uploaded my security agreement and draft UCC-1 and it immediately flagged that I had the wrong entity type listed. Would have been another rejected filing. The cross-check feature is pretty handy for these complex debtor name situations.
0 coins
Zainab Ali
•How much does something like that cost? Seems like it could save a lot of filing fees and time.
0 coins
Miguel Herrera
•Haven't looked at pricing but definitely cheaper than multiple rejected filings and the stress of missing perfection deadlines. The time savings alone made it worth it.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
Document the exact steps you took for each rejected filing. Include the debtor name format you used, the collateral description, and the rejection reason. That pattern might help identify what's causing the rejections. Sometimes it's not just the debtor name - could be issues with the collateral description or other fields.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•There you go. The collateral description needs to make sense in the context of US law and your security agreement. References to Canadian documentation might be confusing the filing system.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•Exactly! Keep the collateral description generic enough to cover the equipment but specific enough to identify it. Don't reference foreign documents in the UCC-1 itself.
0 coins