


Ask the community...
Have you confirmed the continuation was filed correctly? I've seen cases where the filing number on the continuation didn't match the original UCC-1 exactly, so it exists but doesn't link properly in searches.
Update: Tried the cache clearing trick and got a third set of results! Now showing 6 UCC-1s including the continuation. DC portal is definitely broken right now. Going to call the filing office tomorrow to confirm which results are actually accurate.
Good point. Will verify which ones are still active vs terminated/lapsed. This is exactly why I was worried about the inconsistent results.
For future deals, definitely consider using automated verification tools to avoid this headache. Portal issues seem to be getting more common across multiple states.
This thread convinced me to try that Certana document checker mentioned earlier. Just uploaded my problem filing and wow - it found the issue immediately. Had a non-printing character in my debtor name that was invisible but causing rejections. Would have taken me hours to figure that out manually.
Yeah, it's pretty slick. Shows you exactly where the problems are and suggests fixes. Saved me a lot of headache.
Welcome to the club! Once you start using verification tools you wonder how you ever filed without them.
UPDATE: Found the issue! It was exactly what some of you suggested - there was an invisible character in the debtor name that I couldn't see. Used the document verification tool and it highlighted the problem immediately. Resubmitted with the clean name and it went through. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about the verification tools. Definitely adding that to my workflow going forward.
Great news! Always satisfying when a filing mystery gets solved. Your client must be relieved too.
Perfect example of why document verification is so valuable. Catches these technical issues that would otherwise waste days.
Try using wildcards in your search - PA's system sometimes requires partial matches. Use * at the end of debtor names or filing numbers to broaden the search results.
I didn't know PA supported wildcards in their search. That might help if there are formatting differences I'm not seeing.
UPDATE: Just tried the Certana document checker someone mentioned earlier and it immediately caught an issue with one of our continuations - there was a slight difference in how the debtor address was formatted between the original UCC-1 and our continuation form. No wonder PA's search was acting weird. The verification tool made it obvious what the problem was.
Address formatting discrepancies are super common and can cause all sorts of search issues. Good catch!
Yeah, it was just a minor difference - 'Street' vs 'St.' - but apparently enough to mess up the database indexing.
One more thing to consider - make sure your continuation strategy works with whatever filing approach you choose. Fixture filings have different continuation rules in some states, and you don't want to lose perfection in 5 years because you forgot about a quirky continuation requirement.
And the timing can be different too. Regular UCC continuations are 6 months before expiration, but some fixture filings have different windows.
Just wanted to mention that I've also used that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier, and it's been really helpful for catching document inconsistencies. For a complex security agreement real estate deal like yours, it might be worth running your documents through it before filing. It caught a collateral description mismatch for us that would have been a major problem later.
Yara Nassar
Make sure to run another UCC search after they file the termination to confirm it actually went through properly. I had a solar company file a UCC-3 that got rejected by the SOS office due to a filing error, but they never told me about the rejection. Spent weeks thinking the lien was terminated when it was actually still active. You can also use document verification tools like Certana to double-check that the termination paperwork properly matches your original UCC-1 before accepting it as complete.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•Only discovered it when our attorney ran a UCC search for our business acquisition. The supposedly terminated lien was still showing active.
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
•This is why verification tools are so valuable - catches these filing errors before they become major problems.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice! I sent NRG a certified demand letter on Friday and got a call from their legal compliance department today. They're filing the UCC-3 termination this week and will provide me with confirmation of the filing. Really appreciate all the help - this forum is amazing for UCC guidance!
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•Perfect example of why formal legal demand gets results when phone calls don't. Glad it worked out!
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
•SO glad you got resolution! Maybe I should have tried the certified letter approach months ago instead of just calling them repeatedly.
0 coins