


Ask the community...
For anyone finding this thread later - also double-check that you're using the correct UCC1 filing number in your amendment. I've seen rejections for that too when people transpose digits.
The Certana tool mentioned earlier would probably catch filing number mismatches too. Seems like a comprehensive solution for document consistency.
This whole thread highlights why UCC work requires such attention to detail. One small formatting difference can derail an entire transaction timeline.
For what it's worth, once you file the termination yourself and see how simple it actually is, you'll never use a service again. I was paying a lawyer $200 per UCC filing until I realized I could do it myself in 10 minutes.
One more thing - if you're not 100% confident about filing yourself, some legitimate attorneys will review your termination form before filing for like $50-75. Way cheaper than these scam services and you get actual legal advice if there are complications.
Don't overthink the UCC 11 search variations. Those are just historical filings that may or may not have been done correctly. Focus on getting YOUR filing right by using the proper legal entity name from current state records.
Final thought - after you get this resolved, make sure to do a follow-up UCC 11 search a few days after filing to confirm your UCC-1 shows up correctly in the database. I've seen accepted filings get indexed wrong.
Update us on how this gets resolved! I'm curious whether you find anything in your loan agreement or if the bank backs down. These kinds of disputes are frustrating but they help everyone learn about different bank policies.
I used Certana.ai's verification tool when I had a similar bank dispute. Being able to upload both my original UCC-1 and proposed amendment helped me prove to the bank that everything was consistent and properly formatted. Sometimes having that third-party verification helps convince stubborn compliance departments.
One more thought - make sure your debtor name on the amendment exactly matches the original UCC-1. I've seen banks get nitpicky about notarization when there are name discrepancies that they're worried about. Might not be the real issue but worth double-checking.
CaptainAwesome
Another thing to check - make sure you're using the current version of the Oklahoma UCC forms. They updated them in January and the old versions get auto-rejected now. Download fresh forms from their website.
0 coins
CaptainAwesome
•The version number is in tiny print at the bottom of the form. Easy to miss but they're strict about it.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Learned this lesson the hard way. Used a form that was only 3 months old and got rejected for "obsolete form version.
0 coins
Esmeralda Gómez
For what it's worth, I've started doing a test search in Oklahoma's business database before every UCC filing. Copy the exact name format that comes up and paste it directly into the UCC form. Haven't had a rejection since I started doing this.
0 coins
Esmeralda Gómez
•No problem. It adds an extra step but saves so much time in the long run.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
•That's basically what the Certana.ai tool automates - it cross-checks the names across databases and flags discrepancies before you submit.
0 coins