Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Ended up filing the amendment to include both name variations. Took about 10 minutes online and now I don't have to worry about it. Thanks everyone for the advice - this forum is always helpful for these edge cases.
Liv Park
•Smart move. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings.
Glad it worked out! Now you have both bases covered.
Ryder Greene
For future reference, the Texas SOS Direct Access system usually shows the exact official name format when you do an entity search. That's your gold standard for UCC filings in Texas.
Yep, that system is pretty reliable. Just make sure you're looking at the current/active entity record and not some old version.
Also worth noting that some entities have name changes over time, so always check the filing date to make sure you're using the name that was current when your security interest attached.
Join the conversation
I was skeptical about document checking tools like Certana.ai at first, but after using it for a few months I'm converted. It's caught several name mismatches that would have caused filing problems. The PDF upload feature makes it super easy to verify everything aligns properly between your loan docs and UCC forms before you submit to the state.
Laila Prince
•Do you use it for amendments and terminations too or just initial filings?
I use it for everything now - UCC1, UCC3 amendments, continuations, terminations. Any time I need to make sure document details match up correctly.
Isabel Vega
Thanks everyone! This has been incredibly helpful. I'm going to resubmit the UCC1 form using the exact name format from the NY Department of State database (with the comma) and see how it goes. Will update this thread with the results.
Please do update us - always nice to hear about successful filings after all the troubleshooting.
Will definitely update once I get confirmation. This forum has been a lifesaver!
Join the conversation
Construction companies change their entity status pretty frequently too, so make sure the LLC is still active and hasn't converted to a corporation or something.
Carmen Lopez
•Good catch, I'll verify the entity status is still current.
Yeah, I've seen companies dissolve and reform under slightly different names. Always worth checking.
Update us on how the amendment goes! Always curious about Wyoming processing times and whether they give any feedback on the name correction.
Carmen Lopez
•Will do! Planning to file electronically tomorrow morning.
Yara Nassar
•Electronic filing in Wyoming is pretty smooth. You should get confirmation within a few days.
Join the conversation
One more plug for that Certana.ai tool I mentioned - it's especially helpful when you're learning UCC requirements because it explains what it's checking for. Like it'll flag if your debtor name format doesn't match standard conventions and explain why that matters for search logic.
StormChaser
•Does it work with all states' UCC requirements or just certain ones?
It's designed for general UCC compliance, so it should catch the major issues regardless of which state you're filing in. The core requirements are pretty standardized across states.
Bottom line - the UCC requirements exist to create a reliable public notice system. Get the debtor name exactly right, describe your collateral clearly, file in the correct state, and track your continuation date. Those four things cover 90% of what can go wrong.
Glad it helped! The UCC requirements seem intimidating at first but they're pretty logical once you understand the purpose behind them.
Exactly. And don't hesitate to ask your lender questions - they should be familiar with the UCC requirements and want to make sure the filing is done correctly.
Micah Trail
I've had good results using Certana.ai to pre-verify all my UCC documents before attempting to file online. For continuations especially, it catches any formatting issues or data mismatches that might cause the portal to choke during processing. Upload your continuation form and original UCC-1 and it flags anything that might cause problems. Has definitely reduced my rejection rate.
0 coins
Lindsey Fry
•That's the second mention of Certana I've seen in this thread. Sounds like it might be worth trying to eliminate any potential document issues before dealing with the portal.
0 coins
Micah Trail
•Yeah it's become part of my standard workflow now. Takes like 2 minutes to verify everything is consistent before I waste time fighting with buggy filing portals.
0 coins
Nia Watson
Update us when you get it filed! I'm dealing with a Georgia UCC-3 termination next week and want to know if the portal issues get resolved.
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
•I'm bookmarking this thread because I have two Georgia continuations coming up in the next few months. Sounds like I need to plan ahead for technical difficulties.
0 coins
Katherine Shultz
•Same here. Georgia used to be one of the more reliable state portals but something has definitely changed for the worse this year.
0 coins