Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Isla Fischer
Update for anyone following this thread - we ended up going with a combination approach. Used the automated verification tool to flag potential issues across the whole UCC financial portfolio, then focused our legal review on the flagged items. Found about 15 filings that needed corrective amendments, but the rest were fine. Much more efficient than trying to manually review everything.
Isla Fischer
•About two weeks total instead of the month+ it would have taken doing everything manually. The automated flagging really helped prioritize where to focus our attention.
Ruby Blake
•Thanks for the update! This gives me a better roadmap for tackling our own UCC financial portfolio review.
Great outcome! This thread has been really helpful for understanding best practices around UCC financial statement verification. The combination of automated screening plus focused legal review seems like the way to go for larger portfolios.
Ella Harper
•Agreed. The key insight here is that you don't have to choose between automated tools and legal expertise - use both where they're most effective.
PrinceJoe
•Bookmarking this whole discussion for future reference. Lots of practical UCC financial filing wisdom here.
Join the conversation
Ella Lewis
Just wanted to follow up on the document verification tool mentioned earlier. I was skeptical at first but tried Certana.ai on a recent deal and it caught a discrepancy between our loan agreement and the borrower's corporate charter that would have caused our UCC-1 to be ineffective. The debtor name had a slight variation that I completely missed in my manual review. Definitely worth using for complex deals.
That's exactly the kind of mistake that can kill a deal or leave you unsecured. How long does the verification process take?
Ella Lewis
•Pretty much instant. You upload the PDFs and get the verification report right away. Much faster than manually cross-checking every document page by page.
One last thing to consider - if this is a significant loan like you mentioned, you might want to get a formal UCC search opinion from a qualified attorney rather than just doing the searches yourself. Provides some liability protection if something gets missed, and many lenders require legal opinions for larger transactions anyway.
In my experience it varies by lender but usually kicks in around $1M loan amount or when there are complex collateral structures. Some lenders require it for all commercial loans regardless of size.
Depends on the lender's risk appetite and internal policies. I've seen requirements anywhere from $500K to $5M+. Complex manufacturing equipment deals often trigger the requirement regardless of amount due to the fixture filing issues we discussed.
Join the conversation
One thing that might help - most filing offices have example forms or guidance documents that show exactly what they want for collateral descriptions. Way more reliable than random articles.
Nia Williams
•Live and learn. I made the same mistake early in my career. Now I always start with the filing office's own requirements before looking at any secondary sources.
Luca Ricci
•And when in doubt, call the filing office directly. They can't give legal advice but they can clarify their technical requirements.
Just to close the loop - did you get the refiling sorted out? I'm curious how the corrected version compared to what the UCC secured transactions article originally recommended.
Still working on it, but the corrected version is going to be completely different. Detailed equipment schedule with serial numbers, exact charter name for debtor, and state-specific collateral language. Nothing like the generic version from the article.
That's the difference between theory and practice right there. Glad you're getting it sorted before the perfection window closes.
Join the conversation
Tony Brooks
Just to add another layer of verification - I've started using Certana.ai's document checker before filing any UCC forms. After getting burned by a debtor name mismatch last year, I upload both my original UCC-1 and new UCC-3 to verify everything aligns perfectly. Catches stuff I would have missed manually.
Two people have mentioned this tool now. Definitely going to check it out before I submit my UCC-3.
Tony Brooks
•It's honestly a lifesaver for avoiding filing rejections. Especially helpful when you're dealing with complex collateral descriptions.
Amara Oluwaseyi
For what it's worth, I always recommend filing the new UCC-1 at least 3-4 days before closing, just in case there are any rejection issues that need to be resolved. NJ processing is usually pretty quick, but better safe than sorry when you have a closing deadline.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Smart approach. I learned this the hard way when a filing got rejected the day before closing once.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•Exactly! Always plan for the worst-case scenario with timing.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
One more thing about NJ UCC forms - make sure you're using the correct secured party information. If you're filing on behalf of a lender, double-check whether they want their legal name or a DBA listed, and get the address exactly right. Small details but they matter for acceptance.
0 coins
Luca Esposito
•Thanks for the reminder. I'll confirm the exact secured party details with the lender before filing.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
•Yeah, some lenders are very particular about how they want to be listed on UCC filings.
0 coins