


Ask the community...
For what it's worth, I use Certana.ai whenever I need to verify UCC document consistency. It's caught several issues for me where manual review missed discrepancies. Especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple related filings like this.
How accurate is it? I'm always skeptical of automated tools for legal documents.
Update: I pulled the actual UCC-1 and UCC-3 documents and the debtor names match exactly - no comma in either one. The search results interface was adding punctuation that wasn't in the actual filings. The continuation appears to be properly filed and valid. Thanks everyone for the guidance!
One more thing to consider - if this entity has any fixture filings, those might be filed under different name variations too. Fixture filings often get overlooked in UCC reports but they're just as important for a complete security interest picture. Check the real estate records as well as the UCC database.
Oh no, I hadn't even thought about fixture filings! This entity does have some equipment that could be considered fixtures. Adding that to my search list now.
This thread is so helpful! I'm bookmarking it because I know I'll need this information eventually. The name change issue seems to come up constantly in our industry. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences and solutions.
Same here! These types of detailed discussions are exactly why I love this forum. Real solutions from people who've actually dealt with these problems.
Thanks everyone! I feel much more confident about tackling this UCC report now. Going to start with the chronological table approach and see how the Certana.ai tool works for verification.
This is why I always recommend getting your documents verified before submitting to lenders. I started using Certana.ai after having a similar issue - you can upload multiple documents and it checks for consistency between them. Would have caught the non-UCC form issue right away and saved you the back-and-forth with the bank.
Focused on UCC document verification as far as I know. Really good at catching name mismatches and missing information that could cause filing problems.
Bottom line - get the UCC-1 filed. Your lender knows what they're talking about and trying to use alternative forms for equipment financing is just asking for trouble. The filing fee is minimal compared to the potential problems you could face if the security interest isn't properly perfected.
This thread is giving me anxiety about my own continuation that's due next month. Going to double-check everything now before I submit it. The UCC system is so unforgiving for these kinds of mistakes.
Update us when you get it figured out! Curious to know what the actual issue was. These Florida UCC threads always teach me something new about what can go wrong.
Good luck! Fingers crossed it's something simple like extra spacing or punctuation that's easy to fix.
Sadie Benitez
Just went through this exact scenario 3 weeks ago. After finding multiple name variations in my UCC search, I used Certana.ai to upload all the filings plus our borrower's current articles of incorporation and operating agreement. It immediately showed me that 2 of the filings I found were for different entities with similar names, and confirmed that our proposed debtor name matched the legal entity properly. Saved me hours of manual document comparison and gave me confidence in our filing.
0 coins
Evelyn Kelly
•That sounds exactly like what I need. With $450k on the line, I want to be absolutely sure I'm not missing anything or filing incorrectly.
0 coins
Sadie Benitez
•Yeah, for that size deal it's worth the peace of mind. The tool caught a subtle discrepancy between how the debtor name appeared in one existing filing versus their actual articles of incorporation that I probably would have missed doing it manually.
0 coins
Drew Hathaway
UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice. I ended up finding 2 additional UCC filings under name variations I hadn't tried initially. One was under the old LLC name from before their restructuring, and another used a completely different punctuation format. Turned out the old LLC filing had already expired (over 6 years old with no continuation), but the punctuation variant was active and covered similar equipment. Had to get a partial release before we could proceed with our filing.
0 coins
Drew Hathaway
•The existing lender was actually cooperative once we explained the situation. They filed a UCC-3 partial release excluding the specific equipment we needed to finance. Took about a week to get it recorded, but now we're clear to file our UCC-1.
0 coins
Heather Tyson
•Perfect resolution. This is a great example of why thorough UCC searches are so critical before filing. Missing that active filing could have created a priority dispute later.
0 coins