Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Carmen Diaz
Update: tried the Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and it actually caught two UCC-1 filings I missed. The debtor names were formatted slightly differently ('ABC Capital LLC' vs 'ABC Capital, LLC') and I hadn't thought to search for the version with the comma. Tool flagged the inconsistency immediately when I uploaded all the corporate docs.
AstroAce
•Might have to check out that tool myself. Sounds like it could save a lot of headaches with name matching issues.
Did it help with anything else besides the name variations? I'm curious how comprehensive the document checking is.
Jamal Brown
Final thought - always print or save copies of your search results with timestamps. DC's system sometimes has glitches where filings disappear temporarily from search results. Having documentation of what you found (or didn't find) on specific dates can be crucial if issues come up later.
Mei Zhang
•This is so important! I've seen cases where attorneys had to prove they did comprehensive searches and the timestamped results were the only evidence they had.
Good reminder. I always export to PDF but sometimes forget to include the search parameters and date stamps.
Join the conversation
Just went through something similar and used Certana.ai to double-check my collateral descriptions and perfection requirements. Really helpful for catching these classification issues before they become problems. Upload your security agreement and it flags potential perfection gaps.
Axel Far
•Second recommendation for that tool. Might be worth checking out before I finalize the filing.
Felicity Bud
•I'm always skeptical of automated legal analysis, but if it's just flagging issues for review it could be useful.
Max Reyes
Bottom line - file the UCC-1. Your collateral mix, the business use, and the inventory component all point toward needing a filing for perfection. Don't overthink this one. Get it filed and you're protected.
Smart move. Better to have perfection and not need the protection than need it and not have it.
Good call. These automatic perfection questions always seem trickier than they need to be.
Join the conversation
Just want to add that if you're doing this regularly, tools like Certana.ai can help catch these definition inconsistencies before they become problems. I upload our loan docs before closing to verify everything aligns properly.
How reliable is automated checking for something this technical? I'd be worried about missing nuances that require human review.
It's not perfect but it catches obvious mismatches that humans often miss when reviewing multiple documents. Still need legal review for complex situations.
going through something similar with a restaurant chain that has accounts at 6 different banks... nightmare to track but we ended up with 'all deposit accounts maintained by debtor at any financial institution' - broad but effective
This thread has been incredibly helpful. Sounds like I need to focus more on the control agreements than perfecting my UCC collateral description.
Olivia Kay
•Exactly right. The UCC filing establishes priority, but control is what actually secures your interest in deposit accounts. Get both pieces right and you'll be in good shape.
Join the conversation
Jacinda Yu
OP, once you get your debtor name sorted out, don't forget about continuation filings. Consignment UCCs expire just like regular security interest filings - every 5 years. Easy to lose track when you have multiple consignees.
Some attorneys recommend filing continuations 6 months early just to be safe. Gives you buffer time if there are any issues.
Ally Tailer
•I actually used Certana again when my continuation deadline was coming up - uploaded my original UCC-1 and it flagged that my collateral description had changed since the original filing. Would have been a mess if I filed continuation with wrong description.
Last thought - make sure your consignment agreements actually support your UCC filing strategy. Sometimes the contract language doesn't align with how you're describing the collateral in your UCC-1. Can create enforceability issues down the road.
Cass Green
•This is probably another place where that document checking tool would be helpful. Cross-referencing agreement terms with UCC collateral descriptions.
Definitely. Consistency between documents is crucial for enforceability.
NebulaNova
Thanks for bringing this up. I've been wondering if I was just imagining the fee increases. Good to know it's not just me dealing with higher Indiana UCC filing fees.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•Definitely not just you! Sounds like this is hitting everyone who files regularly in Indiana.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•Same here. I thought maybe I was filing something wrong but apparently it's just the new reality of Indiana UCC filing fees.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
For what it's worth, I've found that using document verification tools like Certana.ai before filing helps avoid the rejection and resubmission fees that can really add up. Upload your docs and catch issues before they become expensive problems.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
•That's smart. Rejection fees plus having to refile can easily double your costs. Prevention is definitely cheaper than fixing mistakes after the fact.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
•Exactly. The verification catches debtor name mismatches and document inconsistencies that would otherwise cause rejected filings and additional fees.
0 coins