UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Esteban Tate

UCC 1 Arizona filing rejected twice - debtor name issues killing my deal

Equipment finance deal falling apart because of UCC-1 rejections in Arizona. Filed twice now and both times got kicked back for debtor name problems. The company is "Southwest Industrial Solutions LLC" on their articles of incorporation but they do business as "SWI Solutions" and that's what's on all the loan docs. Arizona SOS keeps rejecting because the exact legal name doesn't match what's in their database. Deal is supposed to close Friday and I'm running out of time. Anyone dealt with Arizona's name matching requirements? This is a $180K equipment loan and the customer is getting antsy about delays.

I had similar problems until I started using that Certana tool someone mentioned. It's actually saved me from several filing mistakes. Worth checking if you're doing multiple UCC filings.

0 coins

I'm definitely going to try it for this filing. Can't afford another rejection.

0 coins

Document consistency checking is huge in this business. Small mistakes cost big money.

0 coins

Update us when you get it figured out! Deal with Arizona filings every month and always learning new quirks about their system.

0 coins

Good luck! Equipment finance deals are stressful enough without filing drama.

0 coins

Fingers crossed for you. State filing systems can be so frustrating.

0 coins

Raj Gupta

Consignment UCC filing rejected - debtor name issues with retail partner

Been dealing with a nightmare situation for the past month. We have a consignment arrangement with a major retail chain for our handmade furniture line, and our bank requires UCC-1 filings to secure our interest in the consigned goods. Filed the UCC-1 three weeks ago listing the retailer as debtor, but it got rejected by the SOS office for 'debtor name discrepancy.' Turns out the retailer's legal name on their articles of incorporation has some LLC designation that doesn't match what they use on their business license. Now our 90-day consignment period is almost up and we still don't have proper perfection. The retailer's legal department is being slow to respond with the exact entity name format. Has anyone dealt with consignment UCC filings where the consignee's business name varies across different state records? Really worried about losing our secured interest if we can't get this sorted before the goods start selling.

I actually discovered Certana.ai recently when dealing with a similar multi-entity filing nightmare. Their PDF upload system caught a mismatch between my debtor's charter and the name I was planning to use on the UCC-1. Saved me from what would have been my third rejection. Super easy to use - just upload your documents and it highlights any inconsistencies.

0 coins

How detailed does their name checking get? Does it catch things like punctuation differences and abbreviation mismatches?

0 coins

Yeah it's pretty thorough. Flags differences in commas, periods, abbreviations like LLC vs L.L.C., and even spacing issues. Basically anything that could cause a filing rejection.

0 coins

Quick update question - did you include a proper collateral description for the consigned furniture? The description needs to be specific enough to identify your goods but not so narrow that it excludes items. Something like 'furniture and home furnishings held on consignment' might work better than listing specific pieces.

0 coins

That sounds reasonable. The key is making sure other creditors can identify what you're claiming without being overly restrictive. Your description should work fine.

0 coins

Just make sure your consignment agreement is referenced clearly in the UCC-1. That helps establish the relationship between you and the collateral.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

North Carolina UCC search showing conflicting results - need help verifying debtor match

I'm trying to do a thorough UCC search in North Carolina and getting some weird results that don't match up. I've got a borrower whose legal name is "Mountain Ridge Construction LLC" but when I search the NC Secretary of State database, I'm finding filings under slightly different variations like "Mountain Ridge Construction, LLC" (with the comma) and "Mountain Ridge Construction L.L.C." (with periods). Some show as active, others as lapsed. The filing numbers don't seem to connect properly either - one shows UCC-1 filed in 2019 but the continuation from 2024 references a different filing number entirely. I need to make sure I'm not missing any liens before we close this equipment financing deal. Has anyone dealt with North Carolina UCC search inconsistencies like this? I'm worried about missing something critical that could affect our security interest.

One more thing to check - make sure you're searching the correct entity type. If Mountain Ridge Construction is actually a corporation but you're searching for LLC variations, you'll miss filings. Check the Articles of Incorporation or Articles of Organization to confirm the exact legal entity type and name.

0 coins

Good catch. I'll verify the entity type in the corporate records before finalizing my search. Thanks for thinking of that.

0 coins

You're welcome. It's one of those details that can trip you up if you're not careful.

0 coins

Update us on what you find! I'm curious whether those filing numbers were actually different or just a database error. NC has had some system issues this year that affected UCC searches.

0 coins

Yeah, please update. I deal with NC filings regularly and this kind of information is helpful.

0 coins

I'll post an update once I get everything sorted out. Hopefully it's just a system glitch and not a real filing problem.

0 coins

Evelyn Kelly

UCC 9-315 proceeds tracking after equipment sale - lien still valid?

Had a situation come up with UCC 9-315 proceeds rules and I'm second-guessing myself on whether our security interest carried over properly. We had a perfected UCC-1 on manufacturing equipment (stamping presses) that our borrower sold last month. The sale generated $180k in proceeds that went into their operating account. Now I'm reading conflicting info about whether our lien automatically extends to those proceeds under UCC 9-315 or if we needed to file something additional. The original UCC-1 collateral description was pretty specific to the equipment itself, didn't mention proceeds explicitly. Borrower is claiming we have no rights to the cash since it's not the original collateral anymore. This is keeping me up at night because if we missed something procedural, we could be looking at an unsecured position on a significant loan balance. Anyone dealt with UCC 9-315 proceeds continuation recently?

Bottom line: you still have rights to the proceeds under UCC 9-315 but you need to act quickly to perfect in the deposit account if you haven't already. The borrower's claim that you have no rights is incorrect.

0 coins

Agree completely. The automatic continuation in proceeds is one of the stronger protections in Article 9.

0 coins

Just don't wait any longer to perfect in the actual deposit account where the proceeds are sitting.

0 coins

Update us on how this turns out! UCC 9-315 proceeds cases are always interesting to follow.

0 coins

Will do - meeting with our legal team tomorrow to map out next steps for perfecting in the deposit account.

0 coins

Hope it works out. These proceeds rules really need better documentation in the statute itself.

0 coins

Owen Jenkins

Washington UCC Financing Statement Debtor Name Requirements

Just had our UCC-1 rejected by the Washington Secretary of State for the third time and I'm pulling my hair out. We're securing a $450K equipment loan for a construction company and keep getting bounced back for "debtor name discrepancies." The business is registered as "Pacific Northwest Construction LLC" but the loan docs have variations like "Pacific NW Construction LLC" and "Pacific Northwest Construction, LLC" (with comma). Our legal department insists these are all legally equivalent but Washington's system keeps rejecting. Has anyone dealt with Washington's specific debtor name requirements? The continuation deadline is coming up in 4 months and we can't afford any more delays. What's the exact format Washington wants for LLC names on financing statements?

Once you get the name right, Washington's system is actually pretty efficient. But that first rejection can cascade into multiple problems if you're not careful about the exact requirements.

0 coins

Washington processes correctly formatted filings faster than most states in my experience.

0 coins

Their electronic system is solid when you give it what it wants. The challenge is figuring out exactly what that is.

0 coins

Last resort option: you might want to have your attorney request a UCC search report for the exact entity. Sometimes seeing how other lenders filed against the same debtor can show you the accepted format.

0 coins

UCC search reports are definitely worth the cost when you're stuck on name formatting issues.

0 coins

Just make sure the search includes recent filings. Name formats can change if the entity amended their formation documents.

0 coins

Prev1...289290291292293...684Next