Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This whole thread reminds me why I hate dealing with UCC filings. You think you did everything right, then someone comes along and tries to poke holes in perfectly reasonable language. At least with real estate, you have a specific property description.
Alicia Stern
•Personal property is definitely trickier than real estate. Everything moves around and changes.
Exactly. And then you have to worry about whether you described it right, whether it's still in the same location, whether the debtor sold it...
Noah Ali
For what it's worth, I've never seen a court rule that CNC machines aren't equipment. They're clearly business equipment used in manufacturing. The debtor's argument sounds pretty weak to me. I think you're in good shape with your current filing.
Maybe the debtor is arguing they're fixtures? But even that doesn't make sense for moveable machinery.
Noah Ali
•CNC machines are definitely not fixtures. They're portable equipment, even if they're bolted down for safety.
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, Iowa's customer service is pretty helpful if you call with questions. I've had good luck reaching someone knowledgeable when I wasn't sure about specific requirements.
Nia Harris
•Good to know! Do you have a direct number or just use the main SOS line?
I use the main number but ask specifically for UCC filing assistance. They usually transfer you to someone who actually knows the system.
Thanks everyone for the advice! Sounds like the consensus is to file 2-4 months before expiration and triple-check all the debtor information matches exactly. I'm definitely going to look into that document verification tool a couple people mentioned - seems like it could save a lot of headaches.
Ethan Moore
•Definitely. The peace of mind is worth the extra verification step.
Let us know how it goes! Always good to hear about real experiences with Iowa filings.
Join the conversation
Aria Park
Just had to deal with a similar 9-511 issue last week. The key is remembering that amendments reference the original filing, so all identifying information needs to match exactly. Delaware's particularly strict about this, but once you get the format right, future amendments are much easier.
Good to know Delaware's consistent about their requirements, even if they're strict.
Aria Park
•Yeah, strict but predictable. Once you know their preferences, it's actually easier than states that are inconsistent.
Noah Ali
Thanks everyone - this thread has been super helpful. Going to file the UCC-3 with the original corp name to stay 9-511 compliant and note the entity conversion in additional info. Will definitely check out that document verification tool too since I'm clearly missing things in my manual reviews.
Smart approach. The verification tool will catch stuff like this automatically so you don't have to worry about 9-511 compliance issues in the future.
Liam Mendez
•Sounds like a solid plan. Good luck with the filing!
Join the conversation
One more suggestion - try the Certana document checker to compare your UCC-1 against the business charter documents. It catches name discrepancies that cause these rejections and you'll know for sure before resubmitting. I use it for all my Maryland filings now after getting burned too many times.
Nia Williams
•It's pretty straightforward - just upload both documents and it shows you exactly where the names don't match. Saves a lot of guesswork.
Luca Ricci
•Better than going through another rejection cycle and losing more time on these deals.
Update us when you figure out what was causing the rejections! Always helpful to know what specific issues other people run into with Maryland UCC forms.
Will do. Going to pull all the charter documents and compare character by character. Hopefully that solves it.
Good luck! Maryland can be tricky but once you get the format right, subsequent filings usually go through smoothly.
Mateo Sanchez
The search problems seem to be getting worse, not better. I'm starting to wonder if we need to push for better oversight of these state filing systems. The current situation is unacceptable for businesses that depend on accurate UCC searches.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•Agreed. This affects too many people to just accept as 'technical difficulties.' There should be accountability for maintaining functional search systems.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•In the meantime, we just have to work around it with better documentation and verification tools. Not ideal, but it's what we have to do.
0 coins
AstroAce
Quick update - I finally found most of the filings I was looking for by searching with the business names in all caps and removing all punctuation. Still missing a few, but at least I can move forward with the due diligence. Thanks everyone for the suggestions.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•Glad you found them! The all-caps trick has saved me multiple times. Shouldn't have to do that, but it works.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•For the ones you're still missing, you might want to double-check the original filing documents to make sure the debtor names were entered correctly. Sometimes the search fails because there was an error in the original filing.
0 coins