


Ask the community...
This whole thread is why I always include a UCC name verification step in my loan closing checklist. Too many ways for this to go wrong if you're not systematic about it.
Smart approach. Do you have a standard form or process you use for that verification?
One more thing to consider - make sure your collateral description is solid too while you're refiling. I've seen people fix the name issue only to get rejected again for vague collateral language.
This thread is making me paranoid about all our UCC filings. Should I be checking every debtor quarterly for name changes? That seems excessive but I'm worried about missing section 9-506(c) issues.
Final thought - the UCC revision committees have been discussing clarifying the 9-506(c) standard for years but it's still as murky as ever. Until they fix it, we're stuck with this guessing game on what's seriously misleading.
Thanks everyone for the advice. I'm definitely filing the UCC-3 amendment tomorrow. Better to be safe with the 9-506(c) standard being so unclear.
I had a similar issue but it turned out there was actually an error in my continuation filing that made it ineffective. The debtor name had a slight variation from the original UCC-1. Might be worth double-checking your documents to make sure everything matches exactly.
I used one of those document checking services - Certana.ai I think. Uploaded both my original UCC-1 and the continuation and it immediately flagged the name discrepancy. Had to file an amendment to fix it.
Update: I called the New Mexico UCC office and they confirmed my continuation was filed and is valid. They said there's a known issue with their search database not updating promptly but the filing is definitely on record. Thanks everyone for the advice!
That's exactly what happened to me. The filing was there all along, just not searchable. Thanks for the update!
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai mention earlier - I was skeptical at first but tried it for a complex UCC-3 amendment and it really did catch issues I missed. Especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple related filings and need to ensure consistency across all documents.
Remember that Maine has a 6-month grace period after the 5-year lapse date, but the UCC becomes unperfected during that time so you lose priority. Better to file the continuation well before the lapse date to avoid any gaps in perfection.
I always recommend filing continuations at least 60 days before lapse. Gives you time to fix any problems if the filing gets rejected.
Lauren Wood
Just went through this exact process last month with equipment financing. The Texas SOS online filing system is pretty user-friendly once you have all your details straight. Takes about 10 minutes to complete the UCC-1 if you have everything ready.
0 coins
Lauren Wood
•The hard part is getting the document details right beforehand. The actual filing is straightforward.
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
•Texas charges $15 for electronic UCC-1 filings, pretty reasonable compared to some states.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
One more thing about free templates - make sure they include proper default and enforcement provisions. You want clear language about what happens if the borrower doesn't pay and how you can recover the collateral.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
•That's wise. Even if the UCC filing is perfect, weak enforcement language in the security agreement can create problems down the road.
0 coins
Paige Cantoni
•Self-help repossession rules vary by state too, so definitely get local legal advice on the enforcement provisions.
0 coins