Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One thing to watch out for - just because a transaction falls under 9-109(a)(1) doesn't automatically mean you need to file a UCC-1. There are some security interests that are automatically perfected or perfected by other methods. But for most business collateral, filing is required.
Yeah, equipment and inventory require filing in almost all cases. Just make sure your collateral descriptions are accurate when you prepare the UCC-1.
This is where Certana.ai has been helpful for our team - upload your security agreement and UCC-1 draft and it flags any inconsistencies in collateral descriptions or debtor names before filing.
The confusion around UCC 9-109(a)(1) is totally understandable - I had the same struggle when I started working with secured transactions. What helped me was breaking it down into three key elements: (1) it must be a transaction that creates a security interest, (2) the collateral must be personal property or fixtures, and (3) it must be created by contract (consensual). If all three elements are present, you're in Article 9 territory. For your lending department's collateral analysis, this means your standard commercial loans secured by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, etc. will almost certainly fall under 9-109(a)(1), triggering all the Article 9 perfection and filing requirements. The key is distinguishing these consensual security interests from things like statutory liens or real estate mortgages that have their own rules outside Article 9.
This breakdown into the three elements is really helpful! The "by contract" requirement makes so much more sense now - it's what distinguishes our voluntary security agreements from involuntary liens that might arise by operation of law. I've been overthinking the scope analysis when really it comes down to these basic elements. Thanks for clarifying that our standard commercial lending arrangements will clearly fall under 9-109(a)(1) - that gives me confidence to move forward with the filing strategy.
Join the conversation
Just went through this for our policy update. Ended up using Certana.ai to verify that all our UCC references were consistent across documents. Found several places where we were citing different subsections for the same requirement. Really streamlined the cleanup process.
Pretty quick - just upload your policy docs and it flags inconsistencies automatically. Much faster than manual review.
We should look into this for our next policy review cycle. Tired of finding citation inconsistencies during audits.
As a newcomer to UCC compliance work, I'm finding this discussion really helpful! One question - when you're citing state-specific variations, do you typically include both the UCC model provision AND the state statute number in every reference, or is there a shorthand approach for internal documents? Also, for someone just getting started with secured transactions, are there any go-to resources for understanding which UCC provisions are most commonly referenced in lending operations? I want to make sure I'm focusing on the right sections first.
Great advice from Carlos! I'd also suggest checking out the Uniform Law Commission's website - they have excellent resources explaining the differences between the model UCC and various state adoptions. For practical application, consider subscribing to a UCC filing service's newsletter (like CT Corporation or CSC) as they often publish state-specific updates when filing requirements change. One tip that saved me early on: create a simple spreadsheet tracking which states you operate in and their key variation points (like different continuation periods or fixture filing requirements). It's much easier than trying to memorize everything!
Adding to these great suggestions - as someone who went through the same learning curve a few years ago, I'd recommend starting with the UCC filing office search functions in your key states. Most have good tutorials that walk you through the practical side of how citations work in real filings. Also, don't underestimate the value of joining your state bankers association if you haven't already - they often have UCC working groups or seminars that are incredibly helpful for newcomers. The networking alone will save you tons of time when you run into specific questions down the road.
Join the conversation
Just wanted to follow up on this thread - I ended up using an automated document checker for my continuation filings and it worked great. Found several name inconsistencies I would have missed. All my filings went through without any rejections. Thanks everyone for the advice!
That's awesome! I'm definitely going to use one of these tools for my batch of continuations. This thread has been really helpful.
Glad it worked out! These kinds of tools are becoming essential for anyone doing volume UCC work.
This conversation has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation in my state and was dreading the manual comparison process for multiple continuation filings. Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like using an automated document verification tool is the way to go. The stories about rejections over missing commas and punctuation really drive home how precise these filings need to be. I'm definitely going to try one of those AI-powered comparison tools before submitting my continuations. Thanks for sharing all your real-world experiences - it's so much more valuable than trying to decipher the official guidance!
I'm so glad I found this thread too! As someone new to UCC filings, I was really intimidated by all the technical requirements and potential for costly mistakes. Reading about everyone's experiences with document verification tools has given me confidence that there are practical solutions available. The fact that multiple people have successfully used automated comparison tools and caught issues they would have missed manually is really reassuring. I'll definitely be investing in one of these services before I handle my first batch of continuation filings. Better to spend a little upfront than risk rejections and refiling fees!
Join the conversation
As someone who's been through several UCC terminations, I'd add one more tip - pull an official UCC search report AFTER you file the termination to confirm it actually cleared from the public records. I had one case where the termination was "accepted" but due to a system glitch it didn't actually remove the lien from the searchable database. Cost me $15 for the search report but saved a lot of headache later when we needed clean records for a refinancing deal. Better to verify it's truly gone than assume everything worked correctly.
That's excellent advice about pulling the search report afterward! I never would have thought to do that verification step but it makes total sense. For $15 it's definitely worth the peace of mind to confirm everything processed correctly. Thanks for sharing that tip - I'll make sure to do that once I get my UCC-3 filed.
That's a really smart verification step! I've had similar experiences with other government filings where the acceptance confirmation didn't mean everything actually updated in the system. For such a small cost, pulling that search report is definitely worth it to make sure the lien is truly cleared. I'll definitely add that to my process - thanks for the pro tip!
This is super helpful - I'm actually dealing with a similar situation right now with equipment financing that was paid off a few months ago. One thing I wanted to add is that some states have online portals where you can check the status of your UCC filings in real-time, which can be really useful both before and after filing your termination. Also, if you're working with an equipment finance company, they sometimes have their own preferred process or timeline for handling terminations, so it's worth asking them upfront what they typically do. I learned this the hard way when I waited 6 weeks thinking my lender would file automatically, only to find out they expected me to handle it!
That's a great point about checking with the lender first! I wish I had known about those online portals when I was dealing with my UCC situation last year. It would have saved me a lot of stress wondering whether everything was processing correctly. The 6-week wait you mentioned sounds frustrating - I can see how easy it would be to assume the lender would handle it automatically. Do you happen to know if most states have those real-time online portals, or is it just certain ones? It would be really helpful to know what to look for when checking UCC status online.
StardustSeeker
Three week closing deadline is tight for this kind of UCC mess. Have you considered asking your title company if they'll accept an indemnification agreement from Tesla instead of waiting for the actual termination?
0 coins
StardustSeeker
•Worth a shot. Some title companies will accept indemnifications for solar equipment liens, especially if the financing is clearly satisfied.
0 coins
Paolo Marino
•Just make sure the indemnification covers the full amount of any potential lien claim, not just the current loan balance.
0 coins
Amina Bah
UPDATE: Found the filing! It was under the homeowner's name as debtor with 'SolarCity Systems' as secured party. Still no termination on file though. At least now I have the filing number to reference when I contact Tesla again.
0 coins
Isabella Brown
•@Miguel Hernández great point about referencing the acquisition agreement! I d'also suggest sending the request via certified mail so you have proof of delivery. Tesla s'legal department can t'claim they never received it. If you don t'hear back within 10 business days, escalate to their general counsel s'office. The acquisition created specific successor liability obligations that they can t'just ignore.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
•This thread has been super helpful! As someone new to UCC issues, I'm curious - once Tesla files the UCC-3 termination, how long does it typically take to show up in the state records? My understanding is there can be delays between filing and when it appears in searchable databases. @Amina Bah with your tight closing timeline, you might want to ask Tesla to provide you with a copy of the filed UCC-3 directly rather than waiting for it to show up in Nevada s'system.
0 coins