


Ask the community...
I went through this exact same situation when I first filed in December! Got laid off from my manufacturing job and had absolutely no clue that job search activities were required from week one. Like you, I thought there would be some kind of grace period to get oriented with the system. The denial notice was such a shock because nowhere in the initial application process did they clearly emphasize this requirement. I ended up just accepting the loss for that week rather than dealing with the appeals process - seemed like more hassle than it was worth for one week's payment. What really helped me moving forward was treating the job search requirements like a part-time job itself. I block out specific times during the week for applications, networking, and attending virtual workshops. Also learned that following up on previous applications counts as a separate activity, which is helpful when you're running low on new positions to apply for. The system definitely has its flaws in how they communicate requirements, but once you get the hang of documenting everything properly it becomes routine. Don't let this one setback discourage you - just focus on staying compliant going forward and you'll be fine!
Thanks Kai! I really appreciate you sharing your experience. The idea of treating job search requirements like a part-time job is such a good mindset shift - it makes it feel more structured and manageable rather than this overwhelming thing hanging over my head. I had no idea that following up on previous applications could count as a separate activity - that's really helpful to know since I was worried about running out of new positions to apply for each week. It's so reassuring to hear from everyone who's been through this same frustrating situation. I'm definitely going to focus on building good habits going forward rather than dwelling on this one mistake. The system really needs to do a better job communicating these requirements upfront, but at least now I know what I'm dealing with!
This exact thing happened to me too when I first filed last year! I was so confused because I thought the first week was just for getting everything set up. The whole system feels like it's designed to trip people up rather than actually help unemployed workers. One thing that's been a lifesaver for me is using the ESD website's job search log feature to track everything digitally. It automatically saves your entries and makes the weekly reporting much easier. You can also set it up to send you reminders about completing your activities. Also wanted to mention that if you're having trouble finding enough positions to apply for in your field, job shadowing and informational interviews count too. I've had some really good networking conversations that way, and it feels more productive than just sending applications into the void sometimes. Don't stress too much about the one denied week - I know it's frustrating financially, but focusing your energy on staying compliant going forward is definitely the way to go. You'll get into a rhythm with it pretty quickly!
Thank you Giovanni! I had no idea about the ESD website's job search log feature - that sounds so much better than trying to keep track of everything manually. I'm definitely going to look into setting that up with the reminders. The job shadowing and informational interview options are really interesting too, especially since like you said, it feels more productive than just sending applications out and never hearing back. I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and tips - it's making me feel so much more prepared to handle this going forward. It's just such a relief to know I'm not the only one who was blindsided by these requirements!
Good luck with everything! This is a really common issue but it's definitely fixable. Don't let your employer's mistake prevent you from getting the benefits you're entitled to.
I'm a newcomer here but this thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a domestic worker too (eldercare companion) and had no idea about the unemployment insurance requirements. My current employer has been treating me as a contractor but after reading all these responses, I'm pretty sure I should be classified as an employee - I work set hours, use their supplies, and they direct how I do my work. Does anyone know if the same rules apply to eldercare workers or is it just for nannies and housekeepers?
Welcome to the community! Yes, the same unemployment insurance rules apply to all domestic workers in Washington, including eldercare companions. If you're earning $1,000+ per quarter from a single household employer and they control your work schedule and methods (which it sounds like they do), you should definitely be classified as an employee. The fact that you work set hours and they provide supplies are strong indicators of an employee relationship. You might want to contact Washington ESD to discuss your situation - and like others mentioned, that Claimyr service could help you get through to an agent more easily if the regular phone lines are busy.
I completely understand your anxiety about this - I was in the exact same headspace when I first started collecting benefits! After being on unemployment for about 4 months now, I've learned that Washington ESD's approach is much more systematic and fair than the horror stories make it seem. They're really focused on data inconsistencies and fraud patterns rather than randomly targeting people. The automated cross-checks they run are actually working FOR you when you're being honest - they help verify that your reporting matches up with employer records and other state databases. I keep a simple spreadsheet with all my job applications, dates, and any income from gig work, and it's given me so much peace of mind. The key thing I've realized is that if you're already worried about following the rules correctly, you're probably doing everything right. The people who get in trouble are usually those who aren't reporting income or are trying to game the system intentionally. Your careful approach to documenting everything shows you're taking it seriously, which is exactly what they want to see from legitimate claimants.
This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been keeping a spreadsheet too, but I was still convinced I was somehow doing something wrong. Your point about the automated cross-checks working FOR us when we're honest really clicked for me - I was thinking of them as this scary surveillance system when really they're just verification tools. It's so reassuring to know that worrying about following the rules correctly is actually a good sign that we're doing things right. I think I've been letting anxiety override logic here. Thank you for sharing your experience - knowing that other people have gone through the same worry and come out fine on the other side really helps!
I've been collecting unemployment for about 3 months now and went through the same anxiety cycle you're describing! What finally put my mind at ease was realizing that Washington ESD's audit system is actually pretty transparent about what triggers reviews. From what I've learned through this process, they focus on three main areas: employer disputes (when your former employer challenges your claim), income reporting discrepancies (when what you report doesn't match employer wage records), and obvious fraud patterns (like collecting from multiple states or claiming unemployment while actually working full-time). Since you're being so diligent about reporting your work search activities and any income, you're demonstrating exactly the kind of compliance they're looking for. I think the "paranoia" you're feeling is actually a good sign - it shows you're taking the responsibility seriously and following the rules carefully. Keep doing what you're doing with the detailed record-keeping, and try to remember that the system is designed to catch people who are intentionally cheating, not to punish honest claimants who are doing their best to follow all the requirements.
I just went through this same process last month and it was definitely frustrating at first. Here's what worked for me: take photos in natural daylight near a window, use a plain white piece of paper as background, and make sure every corner of your documents is visible and flat. For the social security card especially, the numbers need to be crystal clear - that seems to be where a lot of people get stuck. Also double-check that your name is spelled exactly the same way across all documents and your original application. Even small differences like "Jr." vs "Junior" can cause delays. The whole process took about 10 days once I submitted good quality photos.
This is super helpful, thank you! The natural daylight tip is something I hadn't thought of - I was using my overhead lights which probably created shadows. And good point about the social security card numbers being crystal clear, mine might have been a bit fuzzy around the edges. I'll definitely try the white paper background method and take my time to make sure everything is perfectly flat and readable. Really appreciate the specific advice about name spelling consistency too - I use my middle initial sometimes but not always, so I should double check that everything matches exactly.
Just wanted to share my recent experience with Washington ESD identity verification since I see so many people struggling with this. I finally got approved after being stuck for almost 3 weeks! Here's what made the difference: I used my phone's document scanner app instead of just the regular camera - it automatically adjusts lighting and contrast which made my documents much clearer. Also, I learned that if you have any name variations (like maiden name, nicknames, etc.) anywhere in your work history, you might need additional documentation to prove they're all the same person. In my case, I had to submit my marriage certificate because my previous employer had my maiden name on file. The process is definitely a pain but hang in there - once you get the right documents submitted clearly, it goes through pretty quickly.
That's a great tip about using a document scanner app! I never thought about name variations being an issue - I actually got married last year and my employer might still have my maiden name on some records. Did you have to submit the marriage certificate through the same portal, or was there a different process for additional documents like that?
Chloe Martin
FWIW the official Washington ESD statistics page gets updated around the 15th of each month with the previous month's data. So right now you're looking at November 2024 numbers. December data should be out soon and will probably show the seasonal uptick from holiday layoffs.
0 coins
Olivia Clark
•Good to know the timing. I'll check back in a couple weeks for more current data.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
I've been following Washington ESD data for a while and can confirm the current numbers are around 87,000-90,000 people receiving regular UI benefits. However, what's frustrating is that this doesn't include the thousands stuck in adjudication like yourself. From what I've observed, construction layoffs in winter often trigger additional review requirements, which explains your 5-week delay. The system treats seasonal layoffs differently than permanent job losses, requiring verification that it's truly temporary. Your wait time is longer than average but not unheard of for seasonal claims. Have you received any correspondence explaining what specific issue is under review?
0 coins
Javier Torres
•That's really helpful context about seasonal layoffs requiring extra verification! I haven't received any specific correspondence about what they're reviewing - just the generic "your claim is under review" message in my online account. It's frustrating not knowing if they need additional information from me or if it's just waiting in a queue somewhere. Do you know if there's a way to find out what specific part of my claim is being reviewed?
0 coins