


Ask the community...
One more tip: if Washington ESD does contact you about job search verification, respond quickly and provide all requested documentation. The faster you respond, the faster they can process your case.
This thread has been really helpful - I was panicking about this exact same thing! I've been keeping basic records but after reading everyone's advice, I'm definitely going to step up my documentation game. Going to start taking screenshots of confirmation pages and keeping more detailed notes about each application. It's reassuring to know that as long as you're being honest and can back up your job search efforts, the verification process isn't something to lose sleep over. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences!
I'm in the same boat as you - this whole conversation has been a huge relief! I was getting really anxious about whether my online applications would hold up if they checked. Seeing everyone's practical advice about screenshots and detailed record-keeping makes me feel much more prepared. I think I'm going to create that spreadsheet system someone mentioned too. It's good to know we're all dealing with the same worries and looking out for each other.
Final thought - whatever you decide to apply for, keep detailed records of everything. Applications, medical appointments, correspondence, etc. Makes everything easier if you need to appeal or have questions later.
I went through this exact same confusion a few months ago! The term "medical unemployment" is really misleading because it makes it sound like there's one program that covers both situations. What I learned is that Washington has these totally separate systems that serve different needs. If your chronic condition means you literally cannot work right now, PFML is your best bet - it's designed for exactly that situation. But if you lost your job and can still work despite your condition, then regular UI might apply. The key question is: can you actively search for and accept work right now? That determines which program makes sense for your situation.
Yeah what everyone else said is correct. Salaried, hourly, doesn't matter to Washington ESD. I was making $70k salary when I got laid off and had no problems getting approved. The weekly benefit calculation is actually pretty generous for higher earners.
Just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact situation recently. I was a salaried project manager making $62k and got laid off during restructuring. Filed for unemployment immediately and had zero issues - Washington ESD processed my claim just like any other employee. The key is not to overthink it - if you paid into the system through payroll taxes and were laid off through no fault of your own, you qualify regardless of salary vs hourly status. The online application took me about 15 minutes and I got my first payment within 3 weeks. Don't let anyone tell you differently about salaried employees not being eligible - that's completely false information.
Thanks for sharing your experience! It's really helpful to hear from someone who went through almost the exact same situation. Your salary range is so close to mine that this gives me a lot of confidence. I'm definitely going to file tonight - seems like everyone here is saying the same thing about not waiting. Really appreciate you taking the time to reassure folks like me who are new to this process!
The bottom line is communication with Washington ESD is key. Report everything, ask questions when you're unsure, and keep good records of your work hours and pay. Better to over-communicate than get caught in a problem later.
Just to add one more practical tip - when you start your part-time job, make sure to keep detailed records of your work schedule and hours each week. I use a simple notebook to track my daily hours, and it makes filing the weekly claims much easier. Also, if your hours vary week to week, you might have weeks where you qualify for full benefits and others where you get partial or no benefits - that's totally normal with part-time work while on unemployment.
For Washington ESD reporting, you only need to focus on gross earnings - that's what they use for their calculations. I keep track of both just for my own budgeting purposes, but when you file your weekly claim, they specifically ask for gross wages before any deductions. The hours are helpful to track too since sometimes they ask about hours worked, especially if you're working for multiple employers.
This is such practical advice! I'm definitely going to start keeping a work log like you suggested. One question though - if my part-time job has irregular hours (like some weeks 15 hours, other weeks 30 hours), should I still file my weekly claim even in weeks where I might earn too much to qualify for any benefits? Or can I skip those weeks and just resume filing when my hours drop again?
Edward McBride
I went through something similar when my husband got a job offer in Colorado. One thing that really helped my case was getting a letter from HR at my company stating that they had no remote work options or transfer opportunities available. ESD wants to see that you explored all reasonable alternatives before quitting. Since your situation involves family caregiving, you might also want to get documentation from Montana's caregiver program showing that your wife is in the approval process - even if she doesn't have the job yet, it demonstrates this isn't just a casual move. Also, keep in mind that Montana has a lower cost of living than Washington, so if you do get approved, your benefit amount might go further there than it would here.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•That's really smart about getting the HR letter! I hadn't thought about documenting that there were no alternatives. My company doesn't offer remote work or transfers either, so I'll definitely request a letter stating that. And you're right about getting documentation from Montana's caregiver program - even if it's just showing she's in the approval process, it proves we're not making this move on a whim. Thanks for the tip about the cost of living difference too - that's actually encouraging to hear!
0 coins
Honorah King
I've been following this thread and wanted to add something that might help. I work in HR and have dealt with several employees who needed to quit for family caregiving situations. From what I've seen with ESD cases, the timing of your wife's employment status is crucial, but don't overlook the caregiving aspect itself. Washington does recognize family caregiving responsibilities as potential "good cause" for quitting, especially when it involves relocating to care for an elderly parent or in-law who needs assistance. My suggestion would be to gather documentation on multiple fronts: 1) Medical documentation of your mother-in-law's need for care, 2) Official correspondence from Montana's caregiver program showing your wife is in the approval process, 3) A letter from your current employer confirming no remote work or transfer options, and 4) Any timeline information from the Montana program about when approval is expected. Even if your wife doesn't have the job "secured" yet, if you can demonstrate this is a legitimate family caregiving situation with a high likelihood of employment (not just speculation), you might have a stronger case than initially thought. The key is showing ESD this isn't just a voluntary move but a necessary one for family care responsibilities.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•This is incredibly helpful - thank you for the HR perspective! I really appreciate you breaking down the different types of documentation I should gather. The point about family caregiving being recognized as potential "good cause" even beyond just spousal employment is something I hadn't fully considered. I'm going to start collecting all four types of documentation you mentioned right away. Do you happen to know if there's a specific way ESD prefers to receive medical documentation - like does it need to come directly from the doctor, or can it be something we provide? Also, when you've seen similar cases, how detailed do the medical records need to be about the level of care required?
0 coins