

Ask the community...
Thank you all so much for the helpful responses! I talked to my sister and it turns out the kids' regular benefits did come in this month - she just didn't notice because they're direct deposited and she was so focused on the funeral arrangements and everything else. She's going to keep an eye out for any letters from SSA about changes to the benefit amount. Really appreciate everyone's advice and reassurance!
That's great news! Totally understandable that she'd miss that with everything going on. Just as a heads up, tell her to keep track of those payments - sometimes there can be adjustments made retroactively when benefits switch from auxiliary to survivor. If she notices any changes or has questions about the amounts, definitely have her contact SSA for clarification.
So glad to hear everything worked out! It's completely understandable that she missed the direct deposit during such a difficult time. For future reference, she can also set up a my Social Security account online at ssa.gov to track all payments and communications in one place - it's really helpful for keeping tabs on benefit changes without having to call or visit the office. Wishing your family all the best during this transition.
Just to add a bit more clarity - these small adjustment payments are fairly common with survivor benefits specifically. When a person passes away, sometimes there are wage reports or earnings updates that come in months or even a year later. When that happens, SSA automatically recalculates the benefit amount based on the updated earnings record. If the recalculation shows you were owed a small additional amount, they'll issue a one-time payment like you received. For amounts under a certain threshold (I believe it's around $120-150), they often don't generate a letter to save on administrative costs. You could request an official explanation called a "BPQY" (Benefits Planning Query) which would show the exact reason, but honestly for $100 it might not be worth the hassle.
wow thats super helpful info!! i dont even try to understand how they calculate this stuff anymore lol, its like rocket science
I'm dealing with something similar right now! Got a $87.32 payment last week that showed up completely unexpectedly. Like you, I checked my MySocialSecurity account and it just says "adjustment payment" with no other details. I've been getting survivor benefits for about 2 years now and this is the first time something like this happened. Reading through these comments is actually really reassuring - sounds like it's probably legitimate and related to some kind of recalculation or updated earnings info from my late spouse. Still might try that Claimyr service someone mentioned just to get peace of mind, but at least I'm not as worried about it being an error anymore. Thanks for posting this question - you're definitely not alone!
That's an excellent follow-up question. Claiming her own retirement benefits early would NOT affect potential future survivor benefits on your record. Survivor benefits are indeed calculated separately from retirement benefits. So if she claimed her own retirement at 62 (reduced), and you passed away years later, she could still get the full survivor benefit based on your record (assuming she's at her Full Retirement Age when claiming survivor benefits). This is one of the few situations where benefits are truly independent of each other. The reduction for early filing only applies to the specific benefit being claimed early.
Just wanted to add something important that I learned when my mom was in a similar situation. If your girlfriend has any government pension (federal, state, or local), there's something called the Government Pension Offset (GPO) that could reduce her spousal or survivor benefits from your record by up to 2/3 of her pension amount. This catches a lot of people off guard! Also, if she has substantial earnings from non-Social Security covered employment, the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) might affect her own Social Security benefits. These are definitely things to ask SSA about when you meet with them, especially since you're doing all this planning now. Better to know upfront than be surprised later!
One thing nobody's mentioned - working part-time might let you delay claiming Social Security longer, which could MORE than offset any small reduction from lower earnings. Every year you delay claiming between your Full Retirement Age and 70 adds 8% to your lifetime benefit. That's huge! So if part-time work provides enough income to postpone claiming by even a year or two, you could end up with a LARGER monthly benefit despite the reduced earnings.
I was in a similar situation 5 years ago and can share what I learned! I was making $95k and switched to part-time consulting at 59. The key insight is that Social Security benefits are based on your Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME) from your highest 35 years, not your final years. Here's what helped me decide: I logged into my Social Security account and looked at my earnings history. My early career years from the 1980s and 1990s, even after being indexed for inflation, were still much lower than what I could make part-time ($30k). So those part-time years actually IMPROVED my benefit calculation by replacing some of those lower indexed years. The other factor is timing - if part-time work allows you to delay claiming until 67 or 70 (instead of 62), that 8% annual increase in benefits from delayed retirement credits will far outweigh any small reduction from lower earnings in your final years. My advice: run the numbers on your specific situation, but don't let fear of a small benefit reduction keep you from enjoying better work-life balance in your 60s. The peace of mind and extra time with family has been priceless for me.
Isaiah Sanders
I think everyone's overthinking this. You said half his benefit at 62 equals your full benefit at 67, right? So just take yours at 67, enjoy some travel, and when he hits 62 he can decide whether to claim or wait based on your situation then. You don't have to figure out everything now. Life changes, health changes, financial needs change. Just take it one step at a time.
0 coins
Lim Wong
•While flexibility is important, Social Security claiming decisions are permanent (outside the 12-month withdrawal period). These choices affect lifetime income by potentially tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. It's worth creating a strategy, even if that strategy gets adjusted as circumstances change.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
As someone who navigated a similar age gap situation (my husband is 8 years younger), I completely understand your dilemma! We ultimately decided on a phased approach that worked well for us. I claimed at my FRA (67) which gave us a solid income foundation for our early retirement years together. The key insight for us was realizing that while maximizing benefits is important, having guaranteed income earlier allowed us to be more flexible with our other retirement accounts and gave us peace of mind during our most active travel years. One thing that really helped us was creating two different scenarios - one where we prioritized maximum benefits and another where we prioritized lifestyle goals. We mapped out the actual dollar differences and realized the "perfect" mathematical solution only worked if everything went exactly as planned. Real life rarely cooperates! Given your current good health and passion for travel, claiming at 67 seems like a reasonable middle ground. You'll have 4-5 years of benefits before your husband even reaches 62, which should fund quite a bit of travel. And if his earnings record is significantly higher than yours, having him delay claiming (even just to his FRA) could provide better long-term security for both of you.
0 coins
Mohamed Anderson
•This is such valuable real-world perspective, thank you! I love the idea of mapping out two scenarios - the "perfect math" vs the "real life" approach. You're absolutely right that having guaranteed income earlier provides flexibility with other accounts. Can I ask how you handled the transition when your husband became eligible? Did you end up switching to spousal benefits or stick with your own? I'm trying to get a sense of how that decision point actually plays out in practice.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
•This perspective is so helpful - thank you for sharing your real experience! The idea of mapping out scenarios really resonates with me. I think I've been getting too caught up in finding the "perfect" mathematical answer when life is messier than that. Your point about guaranteed income providing flexibility with other retirement accounts is something I hadn't fully considered. It sounds like claiming at 67 gave you the freedom to be strategic with your other investments rather than being forced to draw from them early. Did you find that having that Social Security income actually allowed you to let your other accounts grow longer than you originally planned?
0 coins