Texas Unemployment

Can't reach Texas Unemployment? Claimyr connects you to a live TWC agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the TWC
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the TWC drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been through 3 TWC appeal hearings over the years (won 2, lost 1). Here's something nobody mentioned yet - if you get disconnected during the hearing for ANY reason, call back IMMEDIATELY. Don't wait for them to call you back. I lost my second hearing because my phone died and I waited 10 minutes thinking they'd call me back. They didn't. Also, if your former employer doesn't show up to the hearing (which happens sometimes), you'll basically win by default. But don't count on that - always be prepared as if they'll be there. One thing that really helped me was practicing out loud beforehand. I literally stood in front of a mirror and practiced explaining what happened in 2-3 sentences. When you're nervous it's easy to ramble, but the hearing officer appreciates concise answers. Good luck tomorrow! The fact that you have emails about restructuring puts you in a much better position than most people. You've got this!

0 coins

Thank you so much for the tip about calling back immediately if disconnected! I hadn't thought about that but it makes total sense - I'll keep the hearing number handy just in case. The practicing out loud idea is really smart too. I've been reading through all my notes but actually saying it out loud would probably help me sound more confident and organized. I'm definitely feeling more prepared after everyone's advice here. It's crazy how employers can just lie like this but at least there's a process to fight back!

0 coins

I went through this same situation 6 months ago and totally understand your nerves! Here's what actually happened in my hearing: The whole thing lasted about 45 minutes. It was me, the hearing officer, and two people from my old company (HR rep and a manager). They'll start by confirming everyone's identity and swearing you in. The hearing officer will ask your employer to explain why they believe you quit, then give you time to respond. Don't interrupt them even if they're saying things that aren't true - you'll get your turn. When it's your time, stick to the facts and timeline. What really helped me win was having specific dates and details. Like "On March 15th, my manager told me the department was being eliminated due to restructuring" rather than just saying "they laid me off." The more specific you can be, the better. Also, if you applied for unemployment immediately after being let go, make sure to mention that. The hearing officer asked me directly why I would file for unemployment right away if I had voluntarily quit - it was a great point that helped my case. One last thing - after the hearing ends, they'll tell you a decision will be mailed within 10 business days. Don't stress if you don't hear anything right away. You're going to do great! Having those restructuring emails puts you in a really strong position. Just breathe and tell your story clearly.

0 coins

When I got laid off back in May, trying to get through to TWC was a NIGHTMARE. I needed to ask a question about my work search requirements and spent 3 weeks trying to get someone on the phone. Busy signals, disconnects, hold for hours then cut off... I was about to lose my mind! Finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) and got a callback from TWC in under an hour. They have a video that shows how it works: https://youtu.be/V-IMvH88P1U?si=kNxmh025COIlIzKh. Seriously saved my sanity during an already stressful time.

0 coins

Thanks for the tip! I'm worried about getting stuck in phone limbo too. Did you have any issues with your claim being delayed because of the advance layoff notice?

0 coins

No problems at all with the advance notice. My situation was actually similar - I had about 3 weeks' notice before my actual layoff date. The TWC agent I spoke with (after using Claimyr) confirmed that advance notice is completely normal and doesn't affect eligibility at all.

0 coins

make sure ur applying to jobs now!! dont wait til ur last day. the more applications u send the better chance u have of not needing unemploymnet at all. also the job search requirment is no joke - my friend got audited and had to pay back $4000 because she didnt keep good records!!!!

0 coins

I've been applying like crazy but the job market is really tough right now. Been submitting about 10 applications a week for 2 months with only one screening call that went nowhere. At least I'll have good documentation for the work search requirement!

0 coins

I went through this exact same ID.me verification nightmare back in November and it was absolutely infuriating! The good news is it's definitely fixable, but TWC makes you jump through ridiculous hoops to resolve THEIR system error. Here's what worked for me: I immediately filed an appeal online to protect the 14-day deadline (this is crucial - don't skip this step!), then I used that Claimyr service someone mentioned to actually get through to a human. It took about 45 minutes of waiting but I finally got connected to a claims specialist who could see that ID.me had verified me but their system never received the token. She fixed it manually in about 5 minutes and all my back payments processed within a week. The key things to remember: keep requesting payments every two weeks even while denied (you'll lose those weeks forever if you don't), document absolutely everything with screenshots, and when you do get through ask specifically about your "identity verification token status" - that's the exact term they use internally. Also bring all your documents if you go to a workforce center in person. This system is completely broken but don't let them wear you down - you WILL get your benefits once you get past their technical incompetence!

0 coins

Thank you so much for sharing your experience! I'm feeling a lot more hopeful after reading everyone's detailed responses. It's reassuring to know that this is a widespread system issue and not something I did wrong. I'm definitely going to follow the multi-step approach that everyone has outlined: filing an appeal today to protect the deadline, trying the Claimyr service to get through by phone, and making sure to keep requesting payments every two weeks. The "identity verification token status" terminology is super helpful too - I'll make sure to use that exact phrase when I do get through to someone. Really appreciate this community for turning what felt like an impossible situation into something with a clear action plan!

0 coins

I'm dealing with the exact same ID.me verification issue right now and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I completed my ID.me verification three weeks ago and got the confirmation email, but TWC is saying I never verified. After reading everyone's experiences, I'm realizing this is a widespread system problem, not something we're doing wrong. I'm going to follow the multi-step approach that several people have outlined: file an appeal immediately to protect the 14-day deadline, use the Claimyr service to get through by phone, send a portal message with the specific "ID.me Verification Confirmation Not Received by TWC" title, and keep requesting payments every two weeks even while denied. The "identity verification token status" terminology that Jamal mentioned is gold - I'll definitely use that exact phrase when I get through to someone. It's frustrating that we have to become experts in navigating TWC's broken systems, but this community has provided more useful guidance than anything on their official website. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - knowing there's a clear path to resolution makes this so much less stressful!

0 coins

I'm so glad this thread has been helpful for you too! It's amazing how much collective wisdom this community has developed to work around TWC's broken systems. I'm in a very similar boat - completed ID.me verification weeks ago but TWC's system shows nothing. Reading through everyone's detailed experiences has been a lifesaver. The multi-step approach really does seem to be the way to go based on all these success stories. I'm also planning to file that appeal today and try the Claimyr service. It's ridiculous that we have to become system navigation experts just to get benefits we're entitled to, but at least we're not alone in this! Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their hard-won knowledge - this thread should definitely be saved as a resource for others dealing with this same ID.me/TWC disconnect issue.

0 coins

I've been lurking on this thread and wanted to share my perspective as someone who went through an almost identical situation about 8 months ago. Reading your story brought back all those same feelings of panic and dread I had when I got that appeal hearing notice months after being approved. Here's what I wish someone had told me then: You are NOT in a weak position here. Your employer is essentially trying to have it both ways - they documented your separation as "position elimination due to departmental restructuring" (which is exactly what happened), but now they want to claim it was misconduct to avoid higher unemployment insurance premiums. The timeline alone works heavily in your favor. If there was legitimate misconduct serious enough to deny unemployment benefits, why wasn't that mentioned in your termination paperwork? Why didn't they present this "evidence" to the initial TWC investigator who interviewed both parties? The fact that they waited until AFTER you were approved to suddenly claim misconduct is going to look extremely suspicious to the hearing officer. During my hearing, my employer tried similar tactics - bringing up minor issues that were never documented or addressed during my employment. The hearing officer asked them directly why these alleged problems weren't in my personnel file or addressed through progressive discipline if they were serious enough to constitute misconduct. That really hurt their credibility. Your termination letter is pure gold in this situation. "Position elimination due to departmental restructuring" is the exact OPPOSITE of misconduct - it's a legitimate business decision that has nothing to do with your performance or conduct. Stay strong, organize your documents, and remember that you've already won this fight once. The burden of proof is entirely on them to demonstrate misconduct occurred, and your documentation directly contradicts their new narrative. You've got this!

0 coins

Thank you so much for sharing your experience - it's incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who went through almost the exact same situation! You're absolutely right about the timeline being suspicious. If there was really misconduct serious enough to deny benefits, why would they document it as "position elimination" and then wait months after I was approved to suddenly change their story? That's going to look terrible to the hearing officer. I love how you put it - they're trying to have it both ways, and that contradiction is really going to work against them. The fact that your hearing officer actually questioned your employer about why alleged issues weren't documented is so encouraging. It shows they really do focus on facts and evidence, not just whatever story the employer tries to tell. I'm feeling so much more confident about my February 12th hearing thanks to everyone's advice here. My termination letter clearly states position elimination, I have no disciplinary actions on file, and the initial investigator already sided with me after hearing both sides. I'm going to stay organized, stick to the facts, and let my documentation speak for itself. This community has been absolutely incredible - thank you for taking the time to share your story and encouragement!

0 coins

I've been following this thread and wanted to add some encouragement from someone who works in employment law. Your situation is actually much stronger than you realize, and here's why: The legal standard for "misconduct" under Texas unemployment law is very specific - it requires willful or deliberate violations of company policy, not legitimate business decisions like position eliminations. Your termination letter stating "position elimination due to departmental restructuring" is essentially ironclad evidence that this was NOT misconduct. What your employer is doing is unfortunately common but rarely successful. They're trying to retroactively reframe a legitimate layoff as misconduct to avoid higher unemployment insurance rates. The problem for them is that they already documented the real reason for your termination. The fact that there was a 6-month delay before your hearing actually works in your favor - it shows they didn't have urgent concerns about misconduct, otherwise they would have presented that evidence immediately to the initial investigator. A few key points for your February 12th hearing: - Bring multiple copies of your termination letter for everyone involved - If they claim misconduct, ask specifically what company policy was violated and when it was documented - Point out that the initial investigator already heard both sides and approved your claim - Stay factual and don't get drawn into arguments about unrelated issues Remember: they have to PROVE misconduct occurred with documented evidence. Your paperwork directly contradicts their new narrative. You've already won this once - you can absolutely do it again!

0 coins

This is incredibly valuable insight from the legal perspective - thank you so much for taking the time to explain the specific legal standards! It's really reassuring to understand that "misconduct" under Texas unemployment law requires willful or deliberate policy violations, not legitimate business decisions like position eliminations. You're absolutely right that my termination letter stating "position elimination due to departmental restructuring" is strong evidence this wasn't misconduct. The point about the 6-month delay actually working in my favor is something I hadn't considered - if they truly had urgent misconduct concerns, they definitely would have presented that evidence to the initial investigator immediately. Your suggested questions are perfect - asking specifically what company policy was violated and when it was documented will put them on the spot since there's literally no documentation of any performance issues. I'm feeling much more confident about my February 12th hearing now. This whole thread has been such a lifesaver - everyone's advice and expertise has helped me see that I'm actually in a strong position with solid documentation. Really appreciate you sharing your professional knowledge!

0 coins

I've been following this thread and wanted to add something that helped me tremendously in my TWC appeal hearing last year. Beyond all the excellent documentation advice everyone's given, I'd recommend creating a simple one-page timeline that you can reference during the hearing. Mine looked like this: **2021-2023: Consistent good performance reviews (attach copies)** **July 2024: Reported supervisor to HR for unprofessional conduct** **July 2024: Suddenly placed on 90-day PIP (suspicious timing)** **Weekly meetings: Documented completion of all specific PIP requirements** **End of PIP: Manager says requirements were "just guidelines" - goalpost moved** **Termination: Despite meeting all stated requirements** Having this visual timeline helped me stay focused and made the retaliation pattern crystal clear to the hearing officer. The key is showing the dramatic shift from years of good performance to sudden problems right after your protected HR complaint. Also, practice saying this out loud: "I completed every specific requirement outlined in my Performance Improvement Plan, as documented in my emails. When I was terminated, I was told these were just 'guidelines,' which contradicts the purpose of a PIP and suggests the process was not conducted in good faith." You've got this! The fact that you addressed all the specific PIP items with documentation puts you in a really strong position.

0 coins

That one-page timeline idea is brilliant! I'm definitely going to create something similar - having a visual reference will help me stay organized and make sure I hit all the key points without getting flustered. The phrase you suggested about completing specific requirements versus "guidelines" is perfect too. I've been struggling with how to articulate that frustration professionally, and that wording captures exactly what happened without sounding emotional. Thank you for sharing what worked in your case - it gives me a lot more confidence going into this hearing knowing that others have successfully navigated similar situations!

0 coins

I'm a paralegal who works with employment law cases, and I wanted to add a few procedural points that might help you feel more prepared for the hearing: **Technical setup:** - Test your phone/computer connection beforehand - technical issues can hurt your case if you miss key parts - Have a quiet space where you won't be interrupted - Keep water nearby (hearings can be longer than expected and talking gets dry) **Evidence submission:** - Submit your documents 24-48 hours before the hearing via the method TWC specified - Bring backup copies in case there are technical issues accessing submitted documents - Organize everything chronologically - hearing officers appreciate clear organization **What to expect from your employer:** - They'll likely bring HR representatives and possibly legal counsel - They may try to paint a picture of ongoing performance issues (this is why your pre-2024 reviews are crucial) - Stay calm when they present their side - you'll get your turn to respond **Red flags that work in your favor:** - The timing between your HR complaint and the PIP - No documented performance issues for 3+ years prior - Meeting specific PIP requirements but being told they were "guidelines" - No progressive discipline before the PIP The retaliation timeline you described is exactly what hearing officers are trained to recognize. Document everything, stay factual, and remember - they have to prove misconduct, not just poor performance. You're in a much stronger position than you realize!

0 coins

Prev1...5859606162...151Next