


Ask the community...
This is definitely legitimate and frustrating at the same time! I went through something very similar with StubHub earlier this year - sold some Broadway tickets at a loss and they required my SSN before releasing payment. What helped me understand it better is that this isn't really about Ticketmaster being shady (well, not MORE shady than usual) - it's actually federal tax law. The IRS has been tightening payment reporting requirements, so platforms that facilitate sales have to collect SSNs from anyone they pay, regardless of the amount or whether you made money. The silver lining is that your $210 loss ($330 - $120) can actually work in your favor tax-wise. You'll report this on Schedule D as a capital loss, which could offset other capital gains you might have. Even without gains to offset, capital losses can be used to reduce ordinary income up to $3,000 per year. Keep that original purchase receipt - it's crucial for proving your cost basis. The 1099-K (if you get one) will only show the $120 payment, so your receipt is what proves to the IRS this was actually a loss. I'd recommend just providing the SSN and taking your $120. It's annoying, but it's better than forfeiting money that's rightfully yours over what turns out to be legitimate tax compliance.
This is really reassuring to hear from someone who dealt with StubHub! As a newcomer to this community, I've been reading through all these experiences and it's clear this is happening across all the major platforms now. Your point about the $3,000 annual deduction for capital losses is something I hadn't seen mentioned before - that's actually really valuable information! I was so focused on just getting my money back that I didn't realize there could be additional tax benefits. It sounds like between everyone's experiences here, the consensus is pretty clear that this is legitimate federal tax compliance, not platform-specific schemes. I'm definitely going to provide my SSN and keep all my documentation organized. Thanks for adding the Broadway ticket perspective - it helps to see this applies beyond just concert tickets too!
This is absolutely legitimate - I went through the exact same thing with Ticketmaster about 3 months ago! I was selling some concert tickets I couldn't use (paid $400, sold for $150) and was super suspicious when they asked for my SSN, especially since I was already taking a massive loss. After researching it extensively, I found out this is required by federal tax law. Payment platforms have to collect SSNs for tax reporting purposes regardless of whether you made or lost money. It's not Ticketmaster being extra shady - it's IRS compliance. The good news is you won't owe taxes since you're selling at a loss. You'll actually be able to report a $210 capital loss on Schedule D when you file your taxes ($330 original cost minus $120 sale proceeds). This loss could potentially offset other capital gains or even reduce your regular income by up to $3,000. My advice: just provide the SSN and take your $120. Make sure to keep your original purchase receipt as proof of your $330 cost basis - that's what you'll need to document the loss if the IRS ever questions it. Even if you get a 1099-K showing the $120 as income, your receipt proves this was actually a loss. It's frustrating to deal with tax paperwork when you're already getting ripped off by their resale prices, but $120 is better than nothing, and the capital loss might actually help you come tax time!
As someone new to this community, I really appreciate everyone sharing their real experiences with this situation! Reading through all these responses from people who've dealt with similar SSN requests from Ticketmaster, StubHub, Vivid Seats, and other platforms has been incredibly helpful. It's clear this is a legitimate federal tax requirement and not just another way for these companies to collect our data. The fact that so many people have successfully reported these transactions as capital losses and even benefited from the $3,000 annual deduction for losses is really eye-opening. I was initially just focused on getting my money back, but now I understand there could actually be some tax advantages to properly documenting this loss. Thanks to everyone for taking the time to explain their experiences - it makes navigating these confusing situations so much easier for newcomers like me!
Isn't TurboTax supposed to catch things like the Saver's Credit automatically? I thought that was the whole point of using tax software!
This is exactly why I love this community - so much helpful information! I had no idea about the Saver's Credit either. For anyone else who might be confused like Omar and I were, I found that TurboTax does have a section for retirement savings contributions, but it's easy to miss if you're rushing through the interview. It's usually under the "Deductions & Credits" section, and they ask about contributions to IRAs, 401(k)s, etc. The key thing is that even though Roth contributions aren't deductible, you still need to report them IF you're eligible for the Saver's Credit. It's one of those situations where the same contribution serves two different purposes - your financial institution reports it to the IRS via Form 5498 (so they know you made the contribution), but you also need to report it on your tax return to claim the credit if you qualify. Thanks everyone for clearing this up - definitely going to check if I missed out on this credit in previous years!
Thanks for the detailed breakdown, Ethan! This thread has been incredibly helpful. I just checked my TurboTax account from last year and I definitely rushed through some sections without reading carefully. Going to go back and review the "Deductions & Credits" section you mentioned. I'm also curious - when you file an amended return for the Saver's Credit, do you need to have documentation of your Roth contributions, or is the Form 5498 from your financial institution sufficient proof? Just want to make sure I have everything I need before I start the amendment process.
Quick tip for anyone with capital loss carryforward - remember that you need to use short-term losses first against short-term gains, and long-term losses first against long-term gains. Only after that can you use remaining losses of either type to offset the other type of gain. Then use up to $3,000 against ordinary income. The ordering matters for tax optimization.
Is it better to use short-term or long-term losses against ordinary income if you have the choice? I've got both kinds carrying forward.
Short-term losses should generally be used first against ordinary income if you have the choice, as short-term gains (had you realized them instead of losses) would have been taxed at your higher ordinary income rate. Long-term losses are typically better saved to offset future long-term gains when possible, since long-term gains are taxed at preferential capital gains rates. By preserving long-term losses for future long-term gains, you're potentially getting more tax benefit in the long run.
One thing that's really important to understand is that capital loss carryforwards don't expire - they can be carried forward indefinitely until fully used up. This is different from some other tax provisions that have time limits. Also, if you're married and file jointly, both spouses' capital losses get combined on the joint return. But if you switch from married filing jointly to married filing separately (or vice versa), the carryforward rules get more complicated. The unused losses stay with whoever originally realized them. For record keeping, I'd recommend creating a simple spreadsheet to track your carryforward amounts by year and type (short-term vs long-term). This makes it much easier when you're doing your taxes each year, especially if you switch tax software or preparers.
This is really helpful advice about the indefinite carryforward period! I didn't realize there was no expiration date on capital losses. That's a relief since I have a pretty substantial loss that will take me years to fully utilize. The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I'm definitely going to set that up. Quick question though: when tracking short-term vs long-term losses in the spreadsheet, should I also note the original transaction dates? Or is it enough to just categorize them as ST/LT based on the holding period when the loss was realized? Also, does the carryforward amount ever get adjusted for inflation or does it stay at the nominal dollar amount from when the loss occurred?
I want to emphasize something crucial that others have touched on but bears repeating: you absolutely need to fix this excess contribution issue before your tax filing deadline to avoid the 6% excise tax penalty. Here's what you need to do immediately: 1. Calculate your actual eligible contribution: Since you had HDHP coverage for only 3 months out of 12, you're eligible for 3/12 of the annual maximum contribution limit. 2. Contact your HSA administrator to request removal of the excess contribution PLUS any earnings attributed to that excess. This is called a "return of excess contribution." 3. The earnings portion will need to be reported as income on your tax return for the year you receive the distribution. 4. Make sure your HSA provider sends you a corrected Form 5498-SA showing the adjusted contribution amount. The IRS does track this information through Forms 5498-SA from HSA providers and Forms 1095-B/C from insurance companies, so they will eventually catch discrepancies if you don't correct them voluntarily. Don't wait on this - the penalty compounds each year the excess remains in your account, and it's much easier to fix proactively than during an audit.
This is exactly the kind of clear, actionable advice I was looking for! I had no idea about the earnings portion needing to be reported as income - that could have been a nasty surprise at tax time. Quick question: when you say "earnings attributed to the excess," how do HSA providers typically calculate that? Is it based on the performance of my entire HSA account or do they somehow track gains/losses specifically on the excess amount? Also, do you know if there's any wiggle room on the timeline if I've already filed my taxes but just realized this issue? Or am I stuck with the penalty at that point?
Great questions! HSA providers typically calculate earnings on excess contributions using what's called the "net income attributable" (NIA) method. They look at the overall performance of your HSA account from the date of the excess contribution to the date of removal, then calculate what portion of those gains/losses should be attributed to the excess amount. So if your account gained 5% during that period, they'd apply that same percentage to your excess contribution. Regarding the timeline - you actually have some options even after filing! You can file an amended return (Form 1040X) to correct the issue, as long as you remove the excess contribution by the extended deadline (October 15th if you filed an extension, otherwise April 15th). The key is getting that excess out of your account before the deadline, even if you've already filed your original return. If you miss that deadline entirely, you'll owe the 6% excise tax for that year, but you should still remove the excess to avoid owing 6% again next year and every year thereafter until it's corrected.
This is a really comprehensive thread with excellent advice! I just wanted to add one more resource that might be helpful for anyone dealing with HSA contribution issues. The IRS has Publication 969 which covers Health Savings Accounts in detail, including the month-by-month eligibility rules and excess contribution procedures. It's available for free on the IRS website and explains exactly how the proration works when you switch between HDHP and non-HDHP coverage mid-year. What's particularly useful in Pub 969 is the worksheet for calculating your maximum annual contribution when you have partial-year HDHP coverage. It also has examples of different scenarios (like switching from individual to family coverage, or changing plans mid-year) that might apply to your situation. For anyone who's more of a visual learner, the publication includes step-by-step examples that walk through the math for prorating contributions based on eligible months. It also explains the difference between the contribution deadline (tax filing deadline) and the deadline for removing excess contributions to avoid penalties. While the other suggestions for professional help are great, starting with Pub 969 can give you a solid understanding of the rules before you contact your HSA provider or file any corrected forms.
Thanks for mentioning Publication 969! I'm new to HSAs and this whole thread has been incredibly educational. I just started an HDHP this year and want to make sure I don't make similar mistakes. One thing I'm still confused about - if I start my HDHP coverage in March, can I contribute for January and February retroactively as long as I do it before the tax deadline? Or am I only eligible to contribute starting from March when my coverage actually began? Also, does anyone know if there are different rules for employer contributions vs. individual contributions when it comes to the monthly eligibility requirements?
Finnegan Gunn
This is a really complex situation that raises several red flags from a tax perspective. The one-day timing between the quit claim deed and the sale is going to draw scrutiny from the IRS, and you need to be prepared for potential challenges. Here are the key issues you're dealing with: 1. **Step Transaction Doctrine**: The IRS could argue this was a sham transaction designed purely to split capital gains tax. You'll need to document legitimate non-tax reasons for the transfer timing. 2. **Gift Tax Requirements**: Your father-in-law needs to file Form 709 for gifting a $225,000 interest in the property, even though he can likely use his lifetime exemption to avoid actual tax. 3. **Basis Calculation**: Yes, your wife gets carryover basis (father's original cost plus improvements), but only if the IRS accepts the validity of the gift transfer. My recommendation: Get professional tax advice immediately. A tax attorney or CPA experienced with property transactions can help you document the legitimate reasons for the timing and prepare for potential IRS challenges. The potential penalties for getting this wrong (both income tax and gift tax issues) far exceed the cost of professional guidance. Don't try to handle this alone - the stakes are too high and the transaction structure is too suspicious-looking without proper documentation and professional support.
0 coins
Nia Johnson
ā¢This is exactly the kind of professional advice Isabella needs right now. The combination of the step transaction risk, gift tax filing requirements, and potential IRS scrutiny makes this way too risky to handle without expert guidance. @Isabella Russo - I d'add that you should also consider whether there s'any documentation that could support legitimate reasons for the timing. Did her father have health concerns that made him want to ensure she was on the deed before closing? Was this part of broader estate planning? Any emails, texts, or other communications around that time that show non-tax motivations could be crucial if the IRS questions this. The fact that you re'asking these questions now shows you re'being diligent, but professional help is definitely worth the investment given what s'at stake here.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mazrouei
I've been following this discussion and I think everyone is giving you solid advice about the complexity here. As someone who went through IRS scrutiny on a property transfer (though mine was an inheritance situation), I can tell you that documentation is absolutely everything. The carryover basis calculation that Rajiv explained is correct - your wife takes her father's adjusted basis for her portion. But given the one-day timing, you really need to focus on two things: 1. **Gather ALL improvement documentation now** - receipts, permits, contracts, even photos with dates. The IRS will want to see everything that went into her father's adjusted basis calculation. 2. **Document legitimate reasons for the timing** - was this part of estate planning discussions that had been ongoing? Health concerns? Family financial planning? Any paper trail (emails, texts, financial advisor communications) that shows this wasn't just a last-minute tax strategy. I'd also suggest getting a professional tax preparer who has experience with these situations. The intersection of gift tax, step transaction doctrine, and basis calculations is too complex to risk getting wrong. The cost of professional help will be far less than potential penalties and interest if the IRS challenges this. The good news is that if you can document legitimate reasons and properly calculate the basis, this type of transaction isn't automatically invalid. But the burden will be on you to prove it wasn't just tax avoidance.
0 coins
Anthony Young
ā¢This is all really helpful advice, thank you! I'm definitely feeling overwhelmed by all the potential issues we might face. The timing really was unfortunate - her dad had been talking about adding her to the deed for months as part of his estate planning, but he kept putting off the paperwork. When the buyer came along with a cash offer, everything happened so fast that he finally did the quit claim deed right before closing. We do have some text messages between him and my wife from earlier in the year where he mentioned wanting to "make sure the house goes to you kids" and discussions about avoiding probate. Hopefully that helps show this wasn't just a last-minute tax scheme. I'm definitely going to find a tax professional who specializes in property transactions. This is way more complicated than I initially thought, and the potential penalties you all mentioned are scary. Better to pay for expert help now than deal with IRS problems later. @Fatima Al-Mazrouei - did the IRS accept your documentation when they scrutinized your situation? How long did that process take?
0 coins