


Ask the community...
I'm in almost exactly the same situation - just realized I missed reporting $56 in dividend income from my TD Ameritrade account due to automatic reinvestment. Like everyone else here, I'm a relatively new dividend investor and had no idea those reinvested dividends were taxable events until the 1099-DIV showed up after I'd already filed. This thread has been incredibly helpful and reassuring! It's amazing to see how common this oversight is among new investors. The consistent advice from people with actual experience seems to be that for amounts under $100, the IRS generally doesn't pursue these discrepancies due to cost-benefit considerations and their current resource constraints. Based on all the shared experiences here, I'm definitely going with the "wait and see" approach. The additional tax would probably be around $11-14 in my bracket, and even with potential penalties would be far less than paying for a professional amendment. The insights about the AUR system thresholds and IRS staffing issues make this feel like a very reasonable decision. I'm also taking notes on everyone's suggestions for better tracking next year - definitely setting up an investment account checklist and maybe quarterly dividend logging. It's clear this is just one of those "rite of passage" mistakes that most new dividend investors make at least once. Thanks to everyone for sharing their real-world experiences - it's so much more valuable than generic tax advice!
You're absolutely making the smart choice! I'm also dealing with a similar situation (missed about $42 in dividend income from my Schwab account) and this thread has been such a game-changer for understanding the real-world implications versus the theoretical requirements. What really stands out to me is how consistent everyone's experiences have been - it seems like this automatic reinvestment oversight is practically a universal experience for new dividend investors. The fact that people like Tate actually spoke to IRS agents who confirmed they don't typically pursue small amounts due to administrative costs really drives home the practical reality. Your tax calculation sounds spot-on with what everyone else has estimated for similar amounts. I'm also impressed by how this thread has evolved into both practical tax advice and a support network for new investors learning these lessons. The dividend tracking ideas everyone's sharing are definitely going to save us all headaches next year. It's honestly reassuring to know we're all navigating this learning curve together. Thanks for adding your experience to the collective wisdom here!
This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm dealing with the exact same situation - missed reporting $39 in dividend income from my Charles Schwab account because of automatic reinvestment. As someone who just started dividend investing last year, I had no idea that reinvested dividends were still taxable events until I received the 1099-DIV after already filing my return. Reading through everyone's experiences here has completely changed my perspective on this situation. Initially, I was panicking and considering paying a tax professional to file an amendment, but seeing the consistent advice from people with real experience has been incredibly reassuring. The fact that so many folks have been in similar situations with minimal to no consequences really highlights how common this oversight is for new dividend investors. Based on all the practical wisdom shared here, I'm definitely going with the "wait and see" approach. The potential tax impact would probably be around $8-10 in my bracket, which is far less than the cost of amending proactively. The insights about AUR thresholds and current IRS resource constraints make this feel like a very reasonable calculated risk. I'm also taking detailed notes on everyone's suggestions for next year - definitely setting up an investment account checklist and maybe quarterly dividend tracking to avoid this headache again. It's clear this is just one of those learning experiences that most new dividend investors go through. Thanks to everyone for creating such a supportive and informative discussion!
You're absolutely making the right decision! I just went through this exact same learning experience with about $33 in missed dividend income from my Vanguard account. Like you, I was initially stressed about it until I found this thread and realized how incredibly common this situation is for new dividend investors. What's been most reassuring to me is seeing the consistency across everyone's experiences here - it really seems like the practical reality is very different from the technical "report everything" requirement we see in tax guides. The fact that multiple people have shared stories of similar amounts with zero follow-up from the IRS, plus that insight from Tate about actually speaking to an IRS agent who confirmed they don't typically pursue small amounts, has been incredibly valuable. Your tax impact estimate sounds exactly right based on what everyone else has calculated. I'm also implementing all the tracking suggestions people have shared here - definitely setting up quarterly reminders and an investment account checklist for next year. It's amazing how this thread has become both practical tax advice and a support group for all of us learning these dividend investing lessons together! Thanks for adding your experience to this incredibly helpful discussion. It's so reassuring to know we're all navigating this learning curve as a community.
I've dealt with this exact issue before and it's frustrating! The negative foreign tax credit is definitely a software glitch, not how it should appear. Here's what worked for me: First, make sure you're entering the dividend information in the correct order. Enter the GROSS dividend amount (the total before any foreign tax was withheld) as your dividend income. Then, separately, enter the $142 as foreign tax paid - but make sure it's a positive number. If H&R Block keeps making it negative automatically, try this: Go to the dividend section first and verify the gross dividend amount is correct. Then find the foreign tax section and manually clear out any negative values. Re-enter just the $142 as a positive amount in the "foreign tax paid" field. The key thing to remember is that you're claiming a credit for tax that was already paid on your behalf to a foreign government. This reduces your US tax liability, so it should never be negative. If the software won't accept it, there might be an issue with how your broker reported it on the 1099-DIV form. Don't skip claiming this credit - $142 is real money that should reduce your tax bill!
This is really helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with multiple foreign dividend sources. When you say "gross dividend amount," should that include ALL dividends from that investment, or just the portion that had foreign tax withheld? My 1099-DIV shows both domestic and foreign dividends from the same fund, and I'm not sure if I need to separate them when entering the information. Also, has anyone had success contacting H&R Block support directly about this software issue? It seems like if this is a known glitch, they should have a standard fix for it.
For the gross dividend amount, you should include ALL dividends from that investment - both the domestic and foreign portions. The 1099-DIV typically shows the total dividend amount in box 1a, and then separately shows the foreign tax paid in box 7. Don't try to separate them manually. When you enter the total dividend amount as income, then separately enter the foreign tax paid (box 7) as a positive amount in the foreign tax section, the software should properly calculate that the foreign tax was withheld from the total dividend income. As for H&R Block support, I actually had better luck with the IRS directly (using one of those callback services mentioned earlier) than with H&R Block's customer service. The IRS agent was able to explain exactly how the form should be filled out, while H&R Block support just kept telling me to "try entering it differently" without really understanding the issue. The key is making sure your software understands that the foreign tax was already taken out of the dividend payment you received, so it shouldn't reduce your dividend income - it should create a tax credit instead.
I'm having a very similar issue but with FreeTaxUSA software instead of H&R Block. My foreign tax credit is showing up as negative too, and it's blocking my e-file submission. Reading through all these responses, it sounds like this might be a broader issue across different tax software platforms when handling foreign dividends. I have about $85 in foreign tax withheld from some Vanguard international index funds. Has anyone tried the approach of completely deleting all the dividend entries and then re-entering them from scratch? I'm wondering if starting fresh might avoid whatever input sequence is causing the negative values to appear in the first place. Before I spend money on any of these third-party services, I want to try every possible DIY fix. Also, for those who successfully resolved this - did you notice any difference in your final tax liability once the foreign tax credit was properly applied? I'm curious if this $85 credit will actually make a meaningful difference in what I owe or my refund amount.
I had the exact same problem with FreeTaxUSA last year! The delete-and-restart approach actually worked for me. Here's what I did: First, I completely removed all dividend entries from the software. Then I re-entered everything following this exact sequence: 1) Added the investment name/source, 2) Entered the total dividend amount from box 1a of the 1099-DIV as a positive number, 3) Then separately went to the foreign tax section and entered the foreign tax paid from box 7 as a positive number. The key was making sure I didn't try to enter the foreign tax amount at the same time as the dividend amount - doing them as completely separate steps seemed to prevent the software from automatically making it negative. Your $85 credit will definitely make a difference! It directly reduces your tax liability dollar-for-dollar, so if you owe taxes, it reduces what you owe by $85. If you're getting a refund, it increases your refund by $85. It's not huge money, but it's definitely worth claiming correctly. I'd definitely try the delete-and-restart method before paying for external services. It took me about 20 minutes to re-enter everything, but it solved the negative value problem completely.
Did your son have a job where he received a W-2? Because if someone else filed using his SSN, they probably made up income that doesn't match what's reported to the IRS from his actual employers. This mismatch actually helps his case because the IRS can verify the legitimate income sources.
I'm so sorry this happened to your son! Identity theft during someone's first tax filing experience is incredibly stressful. One thing that might help ease your mind - the IRS is actually pretty experienced with these cases since tax-related identity theft has become more common. Since you mentioned you haven't filed your taxes yet and still claim him as a dependent, you should be fine to proceed with your filing. Just make sure to include him as a dependent as you normally would. The identity theft issue is with his individual return, not your family's tax situation. Also, make sure your son keeps detailed records of every interaction with the IRS - dates, times, names of representatives he speaks with, and case numbers. This documentation trail will be invaluable if there are any delays or complications. The IRS agents handling identity theft cases are generally very helpful once you get through to them. Hang in there - this will get resolved, and your son will eventually receive his refund. It's just going to take some patience and persistence!
Quick question - does anyone know if you'll get all the refunds as separate checks? Or do they combine them somehow? I'm trying to figure out how to track everything if I file amendments for multiple years.
Just wanted to add some important details about the deadlines that weren't mentioned - you generally have 3 years from the original due date of the return (or the date you filed if later) to file an amended return to claim a refund. For your 2020 return, that deadline would be April 15, 2024 (or October 15, 2024 if you filed an extension). Since we're now in 2025, you might have missed the window for 2020 unless there are special circumstances. I'd definitely check with a tax professional or call the IRS to confirm whether you can still amend that 2020 return. The 2021 and 2022 returns should still be within the amendment period though. Also, don't forget that if you do get refunds from these amended returns, you might owe tax on any state tax refund you received in subsequent years (if you itemized deductions). It's a small detail but worth keeping in mind!
This is really important information about the deadlines! I'm actually in a similar situation and was about to start filing amendments for 2020-2022. So if I understand correctly, for 2020 returns the deadline was April 15, 2024 - does that mean it's completely too late now, or are there any exceptions? I'm particularly worried because I had a pretty substantial amount in tuition expenses that year ($18,000) so the potential refund would be significant. Has anyone dealt with missing the amendment deadline before?
Ethan Taylor
Wow, this thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who works in HR and deals with relocation packages regularly, I wanted to add a few practical tips that might help with your specific timeline. First, since you're only going to be in Oregon for 3 months, I'd strongly recommend getting everything in writing from your Oregon employer about their repayment and W-2 adjustment process BEFORE you even start. Some companies have strict policies about when adjustments can be made, and with such a short employment period, you want to ensure they can actually process the reversal if you repay in the same tax year. Second, consider asking your California employer if they can structure their relocation package as a "relocation loan" initially, which converts to a grant after you meet certain tenure requirements. This might help you avoid having two large taxable relocation payments in the same year while you're sorting out the Oregon repayment. Also, given the multi-state complexity, you might want to establish a dedicated savings account just for tracking all the relocation-related transactions. Keep every receipt, email, and document related to both packages - the IRS and state tax authorities love detailed records when situations get this complicated. The advice about timing everything within the same tax year really is golden if you can make it work with your job transition timeline. Have you been able to discuss any flexibility in your start dates with the California employer?
0 coins
Rebecca Johnston
β’This is really practical advice, especially about getting the Oregon employer's W-2 adjustment process in writing upfront! I hadn't thought about how a 3-month employment period might complicate their ability to process reversals. The "relocation loan" structure idea is fascinating - that could potentially solve the double taxation issue entirely if the California company is willing to do it. Has anyone here actually negotiated this type of arrangement before? I'm curious how common it is for employers to offer loan-to-grant conversions for relocation packages. Also, @Ethan Taylor, when you mention establishing a dedicated savings account for tracking - should this include setting aside money for potential tax liabilities on both relocation packages? I'm trying to figure out how much I should budget for taxes if things don't work out as cleanly as hoped with the same-year repayment. This whole situation is making me realize how much I don't know about employment tax law! Definitely going to need professional help, but this thread has given me a much better foundation for those conversations.
0 coins
Anthony Young
As someone who's navigated a similar complex relocation situation, I'd add one more crucial consideration - make sure you understand the difference between "moving expense reimbursements" and "relocation bonuses" for tax purposes. If any portion of your $13,500 is categorized as qualified moving expense reimbursements (for actual moving costs like transport, temporary lodging, etc.), those portions might have different tax treatment than lump-sum relocation bonuses. However, keep in mind that under current tax law, moving expense deductions are suspended for most taxpayers through 2025, so even "qualified" moving expenses are generally taxable. Also, consider the timing of your actual physical moves. If you're moving from Oregon to California in the same tax year, you might be able to deduct some of the California move expenses if you meet the IRS distance and time tests, which could help offset some of the tax burden from the Oregon relocation income. One strategy that worked for me: I asked my new employer to pay certain relocation expenses directly to vendors (moving company, temporary housing, etc.) rather than reimbursing me. This reduced the taxable amount I received directly while still getting the same relocation benefits. Worth discussing with your California employer if they have flexibility in how they structure their $13,500 package. Document every mile, every receipt, and every day you're physically present in each state - this will be invaluable for both federal and state tax filings!
0 coins
MoonlightSonata
β’This distinction between moving expense reimbursements and relocation bonuses is really important! I wasn't aware that the tax treatment could be different even though both are generally taxable under current law. Your suggestion about having the California employer pay vendors directly is brilliant - that could significantly reduce the taxable portion while still providing the same benefit. I'm definitely going to explore this option when I negotiate with them. Quick question about the distance and time tests you mentioned for the California move - since I'll only be in Oregon for about 3 months, will that short duration affect my ability to meet the time test for deducting the Oregon-to-California move? I believe the test requires working full-time for at least 39 weeks in the first 12 months after the move, but with such a short Oregon stint, I'm not sure how that impacts the calculation. Also, when you say document "every day you're physically present in each state" - are you referring to establishing a paper trail for residency determination, or is this more about tracking work location for the moving expense tests? Given all the multi-state complexity others have mentioned, I want to make sure I'm capturing the right information. Thanks for adding another layer of practical advice to this already incredibly helpful discussion!
0 coins