IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been following this thread and wanted to add my perspective as someone who went through a very similar situation. The "wait and report after leaving" strategy mentioned by others is actually quite effective, but I'd also suggest documenting everything NOW while you're still there. Start keeping detailed records of: your work schedule, any emails showing you're required to be in the office, descriptions of your ongoing duties vs. project-based work, and any communications about your employment status. Take screenshots of job postings if they advertised your position differently than how you're classified. This documentation will be crucial whether you decide to approach your employer directly, file with the IRS, or report after finding a new job. I made the mistake of not documenting enough in my situation, and it made proving my case much harder later. Also, consider checking if your company has an HR department or if decisions are made by one person. Sometimes the person doing payroll doesn't fully understand classification rules, and bringing it to HR's attention (framed as a compliance question) might resolve it without drama. But definitely have that documentation ready first, just in case.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

This is excellent advice about documentation! I'm actually in a very similar situation to the original poster and had been putting off keeping records because I wasn't sure what would be relevant. Your list is really helpful - I hadn't thought about screenshotting the original job posting, but that's brilliant since mine definitely described the role differently than how I'm being treated. One question though - how detailed should I get with the documentation? Like, should I be tracking every single interaction or just the ones that clearly show control/supervision? And is it better to keep digital copies or physical printouts in case they try to revoke my email access if things go south?

0 coins

Great question about documentation detail! You'll want to focus on quality over quantity - capture the interactions that clearly demonstrate behavioral control, financial control, and relationship factors that the IRS uses for classification. Key things to document: set work schedules/hours, meetings where you receive direct supervision, any training you're required to attend, use of company equipment/software, and communications showing you can't work from other locations. Digital copies are definitely safer since they can't revoke access to your personal devices. Forward important emails to a personal account, take photos of schedules/notices with your phone, and save everything to cloud storage they can't access. Also document the contrast between your treatment and the W-2 employees - like if they get benefits, flexible schedules, or different supervision that you don't receive. The job posting screenshot is crucial because it often shows the employer's own understanding of the role as ongoing employment rather than project-based contractor work. Keep everything organized by date so you can show a clear pattern of employee-like treatment over time.

0 coins

One thing I haven't seen mentioned here is checking if your company has any policies or employee handbook that might inadvertently contradict your contractor classification. Many employers slip up by including 1099 workers in employee-only policies or expecting them to follow the same rules as W-2 staff. Also, since you mentioned the other admin has been there 12 years, that's actually a huge red flag for the IRS. Long-term "contractor" relationships, especially for ongoing administrative work, are classic misclassification cases. The IRS specifically looks for situations where someone performs the same role for years as evidence of an employer-employee relationship rather than true independent contracting. You might want to research what happened to other companies in your industry who got caught doing this. Sometimes showing your employer news articles about similar businesses facing penalties can be more persuasive than citing IRS regulations directly. It makes the risk feel more real and immediate. And honestly, given that you're new and they've been misclassifying the other admin for over a decade, this company is probably sitting on a pretty significant tax liability if the IRS ever investigates. That might actually work in your favor if you do decide to have a direct conversation about reclassification.

0 coins

This is really smart advice about checking company policies! I never would have thought to look for contradictions like that, but it makes total sense that they might accidentally treat contractors like employees in their internal documentation. The point about the 12-year "contractor" is especially eye-opening - I was actually thinking that person's long tenure might work against me, but you're right that it's probably making the company's situation worse from an IRS perspective. If they've been misclassifying someone for over a decade, the back taxes and penalties could be enormous. Do you have any suggestions for how to research penalties other companies faced? I'm not sure what search terms would be most effective, or if there are specific databases or news sources that track these kinds of cases. Having concrete examples of similar businesses getting penalized would definitely strengthen my position if I decide to approach management directly.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Can someone explain the difference between 1099-NEC and 1099-MISC? I thought I needed a MISC form but now I'm confused seeing this post. I do freelance graphic design if that helps.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Thanks for clearing that up! So I should be looking for 1099-NECs from my clients in January/February. One last question - do I need to give my clients a W-9 form first, or do they just send the 1099-NEC automatically?

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

You should definitely provide your clients with a completed W-9 form! Most professional clients will actually request this from you before they start paying you, or at least before the end of the tax year. The W-9 gives them your legal name, address, and tax ID number (usually your SSN for sole proprietors) that they need to correctly fill out your 1099-NEC. If a client pays you $600 or more during the tax year and you haven't given them a W-9, they're supposed to withhold 24% of your payments for backup withholding. So it's definitely in your best interest to get that W-9 to them early! You can download the form directly from the IRS website.

0 coins

I was in almost the exact same situation when I started my consulting business! Living at a friend's place with no formal lease or utilities in my name. I stressed about this way more than I needed to. The bottom line is that the IRS just needs a reliable mailing address where they can reach you. It doesn't matter whose name is on the lease or utilities. I've been using my friend's address for over two years now with zero issues. Just make sure your cousin is cool with receiving business mail there, and maybe give them a heads up about what types of documents might arrive (1099s, tax notices, etc.). One tip: be consistent with whatever address you use across all your tax documents and business registrations. The IRS cares way more about consistency than they do about proving you "own" the address. Good luck with your new business!

0 coins

One thing nobody has mentioned - if you have proof that your ex knowingly claimed your child incorrectly (like text messages where he admits it), you should consider reporting him for tax fraud using Form 3949-A. The IRS takes this stuff seriously, especially if there's a pattern.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

This seems extreme and could escalate an already tense co-parenting situation. Maybe try resolving it directly with the IRS first before potentially triggering an audit of your ex? Remember you still have to deal with this person for years regarding your child.

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

I'm so sorry you're dealing with this - it's incredibly frustrating when an ex tries to pull something like this! As others have mentioned, you're absolutely in the right here. Since you have full custody, you're the custodial parent and entitled to claim your daughter. I'd recommend filing your paper return ASAP and including a clear cover letter explaining that you're the custodial parent with full legal and physical custody. Attach copies of your custody agreement (highlight the relevant sections), school enrollment records showing your address, and any medical records that show you as the primary contact. The more documentation you provide upfront, the smoother the process will be. One tip that helped me when I dealt with IRS paperwork - send everything certified mail with return receipt so you have proof of delivery and timing. Keep copies of everything you send. The waiting is the worst part, but stay strong! The IRS will sort this out correctly, and your ex will likely think twice about trying this again once he realizes the consequences. Focus on documenting everything properly and let the system work - you've got this!

0 coins

Leila Haddad

•

This is really helpful advice! I especially like the tip about certified mail - I hadn't thought of that but it makes total sense to have proof of delivery. Quick question though - when you say "medical records," what specifically should I include? Just something showing I'm listed as the primary contact, or do I need actual visit records? I don't want to include more personal information than necessary, but I also want to make sure I have enough documentation to prove my case.

0 coins

The Boss

•

I've been following this thread closely as I'm in a similar situation with employer-paid disability premiums. One thing I wanted to add that might help others - if you're still unsure about your specific situation after reviewing your plan documents, you can also request a written clarification from your benefits administrator or payroll department. I did this last year when I couldn't determine from my paystub whether the premiums were being treated as taxable income. I sent a simple email asking: "Are the disability insurance premiums paid by the company included in my taxable wages, and if so, in what amount?" They responded with the exact dollar amounts and confirmed the tax treatment. This documentation became really valuable when I was preparing my taxes, and it also helped me understand that I had the option to change my election during the next open enrollment period. Sometimes the most direct approach - just asking your employer's benefits team - can save a lot of confusion and research time. The key is asking for the information in writing so you have it for your tax records, rather than relying on a verbal explanation that you might misremember later.

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

That's such a practical approach! I never thought about simply asking for written clarification from HR, but you're absolutely right that having that documentation could be crucial for tax purposes. I've been overthinking this whole situation when a direct question to my benefits administrator could probably clear everything up. Your suggestion to ask specifically about dollar amounts is smart too - I realize I don't even know the actual premium amount my employer is paying on my behalf. That information would help me understand the tax impact and make a more informed decision about whether to elect the after-tax treatment during open enrollment. I'm definitely going to send that email to my HR department this week. Having written confirmation of how my disability premiums are currently being handled will give me peace of mind and proper documentation for my tax files. Thanks for sharing such a straightforward solution!

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

As a newcomer to this discussion, I'm really grateful for all the detailed explanations here! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I just started a new job that offers disability insurance, and I had no idea there were different tax treatments depending on how the premiums are structured. One question I have after reading through all these responses - if my employer gives me the choice between having them pay the premiums (making future benefits taxable) versus having the premiums deducted from my after-tax pay (making future benefits tax-free), how do I decide which option is better? Is there a rule of thumb for evaluating whether it's better to pay tax on the smaller premium amount now versus potentially paying tax on larger benefit payments later if I ever become disabled? I imagine it depends on factors like my current tax bracket, expected future tax rates, and the likelihood of actually needing the benefits, but I'm not sure how to weigh all of that. This thread has already taught me so much about disability insurance taxation that I never knew before!

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

Welcome to the discussion! You're asking exactly the right question about how to evaluate the trade-off between paying tax on premiums now versus benefits later. Generally speaking, most financial advisors recommend paying tax on the premiums now (after-tax treatment) for a few key reasons: First, the premium amounts are typically much smaller than potential benefit payments - you might pay tax on $500-1000 in annual premiums versus potentially $30,000+ in annual benefits if disabled. Second, if you become disabled, you'll likely be in a lower tax bracket anyway, but having tax-free benefits gives you more flexibility. However, there are some factors to consider: your current tax bracket, how close you are to retirement (affects probability of needing benefits), and whether you have other disability coverage. If you're young, healthy, and in a lower tax bracket now, the after-tax election usually makes sense. If you're in a very high bracket now and expect to be in much lower brackets if disabled, the math might favor the current exclusion. One thing that helped me decide was calculating the actual dollar difference - ask HR for the annual premium amount, then multiply by your marginal tax rate to see what you'd save in taxes now versus the peace of mind of tax-free benefits later.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

16 I'm in the exact same situation and my accountant advised something different than what others are saying here. He told me that since I own more than 2% of the S-Corp, health insurance has to be handled as additional compensation on my W-2, then I deduct it as self-employed health insurance on my personal taxes. He said S-Corps can't use QSEHRA for owners with >2% ownership. Is this right??

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

17 Your accountant is correct about the >2% owner treatment. As a more-than-2% S corporation shareholder, you cannot participate in a QSEHRA tax-free. Any health insurance premiums paid or reimbursed by your S-Corp must be included in your W-2 wages. The good news is you can then deduct those premiums on your personal tax return using the self-employed health insurance deduction, which essentially gives you the same tax benefit. Just make sure the arrangement is formally established by the corporation before any reimbursements are made.

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

As someone who's been through this exact scenario, I can confirm what others have mentioned about the >2% shareholder rules. The key thing to remember is that even though the reimbursements have to go through your W-2 as taxable wages, you still get the tax benefit through the self-employed health insurance deduction on Line 16 of Schedule 1. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned - make sure you keep detailed records of the actual premium amounts your spouse's employer deducts from their paychecks. The IRS may want to see that the reimbursements from your S-Corp don't exceed the actual premiums paid. Also, the reimbursement timing matters - you generally need to reimburse in the same tax year the premiums were paid. The formal plan documentation is absolutely critical. I learned this when helping a friend who got audited - the IRS disallowed all their health insurance deductions because they couldn't produce the required corporate resolutions and plan documents, even though they had been reporting everything correctly on their tax returns.

0 coins

This is really helpful context about the documentation requirements! I'm curious about the timing aspect you mentioned - if my spouse's premiums are deducted monthly from their paycheck, should I be doing monthly reimbursements from my S-Corp, or can I do it quarterly or even annually as long as it's within the same tax year? Also, do you know if there are any restrictions on reimbursing premiums that were paid before I officially established the health insurance plan with my S-Corp?

0 coins

Prev1...553554555556557...5643Next