


Ask the community...
As someone new to MLP investing, this discussion has been incredibly enlightening! I had no idea about the state tax complexities involved. Carmen's original questions really opened my eyes to issues I never would have considered. A few thoughts based on everything shared here: 1. **The hidden costs are significant** - Between potential multi-state filing fees ($150-250 per state), tax software, and the time investment in record keeping, the all-in costs can easily exceed the tax benefits for smaller positions. 2. **The "trailing liability" risk is concerning** - Logan's experience with Colorado coming after a $23 allocation three years later, plus Giovanni's point about amended K-1s creating obligations years after selling, suggests ongoing complexity that extends well beyond the initial investment decision. 3. **Geographic strategy matters** - The idea of focusing on MLPs with operations primarily in no-income-tax states (Texas, Wyoming, Florida) seems like a practical way to reduce filing burdens while still getting energy infrastructure exposure. 4. **ETF approach makes sense for most retail investors** - The consensus around AMLP and similar funds providing sector exposure without K-1 complexity is compelling, especially for positions under $15K-25K. For newcomers like myself, starting with ETF exposure while learning about the sector seems like the prudent approach. The administrative burden and potential pitfalls of direct MLP ownership are clearly substantial, even if the yields are attractive. Thank you all for sharing such detailed, practical experiences - this has been far more valuable than any investment article I've found on MLPs!
Welcome to the community, Sean! Your summary really captures the key decision framework that's emerged from this discussion. As someone who's also relatively new to MLP investing, I appreciate how this thread has evolved from Carmen's specific state tax questions into such a comprehensive analysis of the investment approach. Your point about hidden costs is particularly important - it's easy to get excited about MLP yields without fully accounting for the administrative expenses and time investment. The trailing liability issue that Logan experienced really drives home why this isn't just about current-year complexity but potentially ongoing obligations. I'm curious about one aspect that hasn't been fully explored: for those using the ETF approach, have you found that the tax simplification allows you to allocate more to energy infrastructure overall? In other words, does avoiding the MLP administrative burden free up capacity to take larger positions in the sector through ETFs than you might have been comfortable with through direct ownership? The geographic concentration strategy seems especially valuable for anyone who might eventually consider direct ownership. Starting with ETF exposure while researching specific MLPs' operational footprints could be a good way to identify potential candidates for future direct investment if position sizes grow large enough to justify the complexity. Thanks for highlighting the key takeaways - it helps synthesize all the excellent insights that have been shared throughout this discussion!
As a newcomer to this community, I've been following this discussion with great interest and want to add my perspective as someone currently navigating these exact MLP tax complexities. I'm in my second year of holding Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) and Magellan Midstream Partners (MMP), and can confirm that the state filing requirements are real and burdensome. Last year, my EPD position generated small allocations across 8 states, with amounts ranging from $12 to $180. While most were below state filing thresholds, I still ended up filing in 3 states where the combined allocations exceeded minimum requirements. What caught me off guard was the timing mismatch - K-1s arrive much later than regular 1099s, often in mid-March, which compressed my tax preparation timeline significantly. This is especially problematic if you're trying to meet early state filing deadlines or need to file extensions. One practical tip I'd add: create a simple tracking spreadsheet from day one with columns for each state allocation and your running basis calculation. I learned this lesson the hard way when trying to reconstruct my 2022 basis adjustments. The K-1 supplemental schedules provide the state breakdowns, but you need to maintain your own cumulative records. For the IRA UBTI question Carmen raised - I have MMP in my Vanguard IRA that generated about $400 in UBTI last year. Vanguard handled the 990-T filing automatically, but I had to specifically request details about which states were involved. The process was opaque and I'm still not entirely confident it was handled correctly across all jurisdictions. After this experience, I'm seriously considering the ETF route that many here have recommended. The 8-10 hours I spent on MLP-related tax prep last year probably cost me more in opportunity cost than any tax benefits I gained.
Whatever you do DONT AMEND until your first refund comes through! Made that mistake last year and ended up waiting 9 months for processing
idk if this helps but my bank literally sent my 1099-INT in february last year too. ended up just waiting for the refund then amended. paid like $150 extra in taxes but worth not dealing with the headache tbh
This is exactly what I needed to hear! $150 extra vs months of waiting seems like a no-brainer. Did you have any issues when you amended later or was it pretty straightforward?
This thread is super interesting. I'm doing a taxation course and we just covered this topic. One thing not mentioned yet is that some businesses have tried to work around 280E by separating their business into multiple entities - one that "trafficks" and another that provides other services. For example, a dispensary might create one business that only buys/sells product (subject to 280E but can deduct COGS) and a separate consulting/education business that provides advice to customers (not subject to 280E, so can deduct all ordinary business expenses). The IRS has challenged these arrangements with mixed results. Has anyone looked into the success rate of these types of structures?
A friend of mine is an accountant for several cannabis businesses in California, and he says these split-entity strategies are getting harder to maintain. The IRS has been aggressively auditing and often recharacterizing these arrangements as artificial. The key is having genuinely separate businesses with different purposes, not just a paper division.
This is such a great breakdown of a really confusing area of tax law! I'm actually a CPA and I still have clients ask me about this all the time, especially with the growth of state-legal cannabis businesses. One thing I'd add is that the COGS vs. other expenses distinction can get really murky in practice. For example, trimming labor for cannabis can sometimes be considered part of COGS (as it's part of preparing the product for sale) but sometimes it's treated as a non-deductible operating expense. The IRS has been inconsistent on where exactly to draw these lines. I've seen businesses spend thousands on tax attorneys just to figure out how to properly categorize expenses under 280E. It's one of those areas where the law is clear in theory but gets incredibly complex when you try to apply it to real-world business operations. The constitutional reasoning behind allowing COGS deductions is solid, but the practical implementation creates a lot of gray areas that businesses have to navigate very carefully.
Thanks for the professional perspective! As someone new to understanding tax law, I'm curious about those gray areas you mentioned. When businesses are unsure how to categorize something like trimming labor, do they typically err on the side of caution and treat it as non-deductible? Or is there some kind of safe harbor approach they can use? It seems like the cost of getting it wrong could be pretty significant in an audit situation.
Just wanted to add that if you encounter login issues like this in the future, it's worth checking if your browser has any stored passwords that might be interfering. I've noticed that sometimes when browsers auto-fill login credentials, it can conflict with session cookies if there was a recent system update or maintenance. I usually try logging in with a private/incognito browser window first when I have unexplained login problems - it bypasses all the stored data and gives you a clean slate. If that works, then you know it's a browser cache/cookie issue rather than a server problem. Also, for anyone who might be new to FreeTaxUSA, they typically send email notifications about planned maintenance, so it's worth making sure their emails aren't going to your spam folder. That way you'll get advance warning next time they need to take the system down for updates.
That's excellent advice about the incognito window! I wish I had thought of that earlier today when I was struggling with the login. I spent way too much time trying different browsers when a simple private window probably would have told me right away it was a server issue, not my browser. The tip about checking for FreeTaxUSA emails in spam is really helpful too. I just checked and sure enough, I had a maintenance notification from last week sitting in my junk folder that I completely missed. Going to whitelist their email address now so I don't miss any future updates. Thanks for the practical troubleshooting tips!
For anyone still having intermittent login issues, I'd recommend bookmarking FreeTaxUSA's direct login URL rather than going through their main homepage. Sometimes during high traffic periods, the main site can be slow to load or have issues with the login redirect, but the direct login page (freetaxusa.com/login) tends to be more stable. Also, if you're using a VPN, try disabling it temporarily when accessing tax sites. Some VPN exit nodes can trigger security flags that prevent login attempts. I learned this the hard way when I couldn't figure out why my login kept failing even though my credentials were correct! One more thing - if you have two-factor authentication enabled on your account, make sure your phone has good signal or your authenticator app is working properly. I've seen people get locked out because they assumed it was a site issue when it was actually their 2FA not generating codes correctly.
Great tips about the direct login URL and VPN issues! I never would have thought about the VPN potentially causing problems. I use one for work and sometimes forget to turn it off when doing personal stuff online. That could definitely explain some of the random login failures I've had with various sites. The 2FA point is super important too. I had my phone die on me last month right when I needed to access my tax account, and I couldn't get the authentication codes. Ended up having to wait until I could charge my phone before I could log in. Now I always make sure I have backup codes saved somewhere safe, or at least keep my phone charged during tax season! Thanks for sharing these practical workarounds - they'll definitely come in handy for next year's filing season.
Emma Thompson
This is really helpful information, everyone. I've been dealing with this same frustration - seems like there's no way around sales tax anymore since that Wayfair decision changed everything. I think the key takeaway here is that trying to dodge sales tax isn't worth the risk of penalties and interest charges. The legitimate approaches seem to be: 1) looking for business expense deductions if applicable, 2) negotiating discounts that offset the tax (especially in physical stores), and 3) just accepting that sales tax is part of the cost of doing business online now. Has anyone had success with timing purchases around sales events to offset the tax burden? Like waiting for Black Friday deals that are deep enough to more than cover the sales tax? That seems like the most straightforward legal approach - just finding legitimate discounts that are bigger than the tax you're paying.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
ā¢That's a really smart approach! I've definitely had success with timing major purchases around big sale events. Last Black Friday, I got a gaming laptop that was 30% off, which more than covered the 8.75% sales tax in my area. Prime Day and end-of-year clearance sales can also offer discounts that dwarf the tax amount. Another thing I've noticed is that some retailers offer price matching policies that can help offset sales tax costs. If you find a lower price at a competitor (even if that competitor doesn't collect tax in your state), stores like Best Buy will often match it, effectively giving you a discount that covers the tax. The key is just being patient and strategic about when you buy rather than trying to work around the tax system itself. Much less stressful and completely above board!
0 coins
Declan Ramirez
Great discussion everyone! As someone who's been navigating this issue for a while, I wanted to add that another legitimate strategy is to take advantage of state tax holidays if your state offers them. Many states have sales tax holidays for back-to-school shopping, emergency preparedness supplies, or energy-efficient appliances where you can legally avoid sales tax on qualifying purchases during specific time periods. Also, don't forget about legitimate exemptions you might qualify for. If you're a reseller with a valid resale certificate, nonprofit organization, or making purchases for certain agricultural or manufacturing purposes, you may be exempt from sales tax on qualifying purchases. It's worth checking if any of your purchases fall into exempt categories. The timing strategy mentioned by Emma and Paolo is really solid - I've saved hundreds by waiting for major sales events where the discount percentage exceeds my state's tax rate. Sometimes patience is the best tax strategy!
0 coins
Natalie Chen
ā¢This is such valuable information! I had no idea about sales tax holidays - I'll definitely need to look up what my state offers. Do you know if there's a good resource to find out when these tax holidays happen? I feel like I always hear about them after they've already passed. The resale certificate point is interesting too. I do some occasional reselling of items I buy and flip online - would that potentially qualify me for exemptions on purchases I intend to resell? I know there are probably specific requirements and paperwork involved, but it might be worth looking into if I'm going to keep doing this regularly. Really appreciate everyone sharing legitimate strategies instead of the sketchy workarounds I was initially considering!
0 coins