


Ask the community...
Another option is to check property tax records for similar homes that sold recently in your area. I did this before buying my house and it gave me a pretty good idea of what to expect. The county assessor's website usually has public records of property values and tax amounts. Look for homes that are similar in size, age and features to the one you're buying, and that sold within the last year. See what their assessed value became after sale and what their current tax bill is. It won't be exact, but it can give you a ballpark figure to work with.
Do you know if there's a way to see just the reassessed properties? When I look at the county website, I can't tell which ones have been recently reassessed vs ones that haven't changed hands in years.
Most county websites allow you to filter or sort by "sale date" or "transfer date." Once you find properties with recent sales, you can look at their assessment history to see both the before and after values. The assessment records typically show the date of assessment changes as well. If your county site doesn't have good filtering options, you can usually still see the last sale date on each property record. Just look for ones that sold recently, then check if their assessed value changed after that sale date.
One thing nobody's mentioned - don't forget about supplemental tax bills! When I bought my house, I got hit with a "supplemental assessment" about 4 months after closing. Basically, they charge you the difference between the old owner's tax rate and your new rate for the partial year you've owned it. So even though the regular annual bill might not change until next year, you could still get an additional bill sooner to make up the difference. I wasn't expecting this and it threw off my budget for a few months.
This happened to me too! I got a random $1,200 bill about 5 months after moving in. My mortgage company didn't handle it because it was outside the normal property tax schedule.
For what it's worth, I'm a rideshare driver and I accidentally left the commuting miles section blank last year. Nothing happened - no audit, no questions, nothing. The IRS is way too busy to audit people over something this minor, especially when the business miles make sense for your profession. Just make sure you have some kind of records backing up your business mileage in case they ever do ask questions. Even a basic log showing dates, destinations and odometer readings would be sufficient.
That's reassuring to hear! Did you keep detailed mileage logs or just estimates? I have a general record of client visits but didn't track the exact odometer readings for every trip.
I keep a simple spreadsheet with the date, starting odometer, ending odometer, and purpose of trip. Nothing fancy. I also save my gas receipts and maintenance records as backup evidence of how much I'm actually driving. Even if your records aren't perfect, having something is better than nothing. The IRS knows most people aren't keeping NASA-level precise records. If you can show you made a good faith effort to track your business miles and that the total claimed is reasonable for your line of work, you should be fine.
Just to add another perspective - the total mileage you reported actually matters more than leaving one category blank. If your business miles seem reasonable compared to your profession and income reported, you're likely fine. What tends to trigger flags is when someone claims an unusually high percentage of their total driving as business miles, like saying 95% of all driving was business-related. Your numbers (25996 business, 2999 personal) show about 90% business use, which is high but could be completely legitimate depending on your work.
This makes a lot of sense. I've always heard that claiming more than 80% business use is a red flag, but I guess it really depends on what you do for work. A traveling salesperson or consultant might legitimately use their car almost exclusively for business.
Just to add another perspective as a tax preparer - what you're describing is super common. The "dependent but has income" situation confuses a lot of people. Key things to remember: 1) A dependent who works still files their OWN tax return 2) They just check the box "Someone can claim me as a dependent" 3) Their standard deduction is limited to either $1,150 or their earned income + $400 (whichever is greater, up to the regular standard deduction) 4) They can't claim certain credits like EIC if they're a dependent With $13,500 in income, your daughter will still likely get a refund of most of her withheld federal taxes, just not as much as if she were independent. This is totally normal and happens with millions of college students every year!
Thank you for these specifics! Quick question - if she files with the "someone can claim me" box checked, does that impact MY return at all? Or are we good since I already filed claiming her? I'm worried about triggering audits or having to amend something.
Your return isn't impacted at all. You've already claimed her correctly as your dependent, so you're all set. Her checking that box on her return simply aligns with what you've already done, preventing conflicts in the system. No need to amend anything on your end. This happens millions of times every tax season with parents and their working college students. The IRS expects this situation and has a clear process for it. Once she files correctly with that box checked, everything should process smoothly without raising any audit flags.
One thing nobody has mentioned - if your daughter is upset about getting a smaller refund, remind her that being your dependent likely benefits her in other ways! You probably keep her on your health insurance, right? Plus the education benefits you can claim (like the American Opportunity Credit) are usually worth way more than what she'd get filing independently. Maybe do the math together to show her the family as a whole saves more with her as your dependent? That helped when my kid was upset about a similar situation.
This is such good advice. I sat down with my daughter and showed her that me claiming her education credits saved our family over $2,500 in taxes, while her filing independently would've only gotten her an extra $400. Made it a lot easier for her to accept the dependent status when she saw the bigger financial picture!
Your boyfriend should also check state laws. Some states like California have much stricter tests for independent contractor classification (like the ABC test). Even if the company tries to argue they meet IRS guidelines (which sounds like they don't), state law might offer better protection.
Would he need to hire a lawyer to deal with this if the company insists on the W-9? That could get expensive real quick.
Not necessarily. There are several free options before considering a lawyer. He can file Form SS-8 with the IRS to request a determination of worker status, which costs nothing. He can also contact his state's labor department, which typically offers free assistance with worker classification issues. If he's misclassified and files the SS-8, the company may receive a notice from the IRS about proper classification. Many companies will correct the issue at that point to avoid penalties. Legal help is usually a last resort after exhausting these administrative remedies.
Am I the only one wondering if maybe this brewery is just a small business that doesn't know what they're doing? I've worked for several small craft breweries and sometimes the owners are great at making beer but terrible at HR stuff. They might have googled "tax form for new hire" and grabbed the wrong one without understanding the difference.
This is a really good point! My cousin's small construction business did something similar - gave 1099s to everyone because that's what the previous owner had done. When an employee pointed out the error, they were actually grateful and fixed it right away. Not every misclassification is malicious - sometimes it's just ignorance.
Cassandra Moon
Don't forget that different states have different inheritance tax rules too! The federal stepped-up basis is just part of it. What state is this property in? Some states have inheritance taxes separate from federal taxes.
0 coins
Sophia Bennett
ā¢The property is in Arizona. I hadn't even thought about state-specific taxes, though. Do they handle the basis calculation differently there?
0 coins
Cassandra Moon
ā¢Arizona doesn't have a state inheritance tax or estate tax, so you're in luck there! You'll only need to worry about federal taxes on any gain above your stepped-up basis. Arizona follows the federal rules for stepped-up basis, so whatever fair market value you establish for federal tax purposes will also work for your Arizona state tax return. Just make sure you keep thorough documentation of how you determined the property's value at the time of inheritance.
0 coins
Zane Hernandez
Have you considered just using the sale price as the fair market value for your stepped-up basis? Since it sold within a couple years of your mom's passing and was apparently just sitting there undeveloped, you could argue the value at death wasn't significantly different?
0 coins
Genevieve Cavalier
ā¢That's terrible advice and could get OP audited. The IRS specifically looks for people claiming no gain on inherited property sales. The stepped-up basis has to be established at date of death, not date of sale. If there was significant appreciation between those dates (like a developer suddenly becoming interested), claiming no gain would raise red flags.
0 coins