


Ask the community...
Sole proprietorship is the simplest business structure but just remember you'll need to pay self-employment tax (about 15.3%) on your photography income. Even if it's under $1k, you still need to report it.
Wait, self-employment tax is 15.3%?? That seems super high. Is that on top of regular income tax? I thought since I made less than $1,350 I might not even need to report it.
Yes, self-employment tax is 15.3% which covers Social Security and Medicare taxes. When you work for an employer, they pay half of this and you pay half, but as a self-employed person, you cover the entire amount. This is in addition to your regular income tax. However, there's good news - you only have to file and pay self-employment tax if your net earnings are $400 or more. So if your photography income after expenses is less than $400, you wouldn't owe self-employment tax. But you should still report the income on your tax return regardless of the amount. Those equipment deductions might actually bring your net profit below the $400 threshold, which would save you from owing the self-employment tax.
Don't forget you can also write off other stuff besides just equipment! I do wedding photography and deduct my website costs, part of my cell phone bill, mileage to/from shoots, lightroom subscription, business cards, etc.
Can you write off education costs too? I took some online photography courses to improve my skills.
I had this exact problem and TurboTax was NOT helpful! I ended up calculating my estimated payments manually and here's what worked for me: For Line 18, you need to list the DATE and AMOUNT of each payment you actually made, regardless of when it was due. The dates matter because the IRS calculates interest based on how late the payments were. If you have your bank records or IRS payment confirmations, just go through and list each payment chronologically with the exact date. Don't try to organize them by which quarter they were "for" - just list them in the order you paid them.
Don't panic about Form 2210! Most people get confused by it. One tip: if your total tax underpayment is less than $1,000, you may not even need to file this form at all - there's a safe harbor provision. If you're stuck on Line 18, just list all payments in chronological order with exact dates. And remember that even if you do have a penalty, it's just interest - not some huge fine. The penalty rates change quarterly but have been around 5-7% annually. Not pleasant but not the end of the world either!
Be careful about amending right away! Make sure you understand EXACTLY what the preparer did first. My sister had a similar situation and rushed to amend her return, but ended up creating more problems because she didn't understand what she was fixing. Get a professional review of your return (a legitimate CPA, not another random preparer). You might also want to check if your preparer has credentials - some people call themselves "tax preparers" without any qualifications at all.
That's good advice. Do you know how much it typically costs to have a CPA review a return that's already been filed? I'm already out the $125 I paid the fraudulent preparer plus whatever I'll end up owing the IRS... trying not to break the bank here.
Most CPAs will do a basic review of your situation for around $100-200, which I know feels like throwing good money after bad, but it's worth it to make sure everything gets fixed correctly. Some might even do a quick initial consultation for free to at least point you in the right direction. You can also check with the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program if your income is under about $60k. They provide free tax help and might be able to advise you on next steps without charging anything.
Does the tax return have an EFIN or PTIN number on it anywhere? All legitimate tax preparers have to have these identification numbers. If they're missing, that's another red flag that you're dealing with someone who isn't properly registered with the IRS.
Also check if they signed the return as a preparer! That's required by law - if they didn't sign it that's a HUGE red flag. Legitimate preparers always sign the "Paid Preparer" section of the return and include their PTIN. If they did your taxes but didn't sign, they're trying to avoid accountability.
To answer your original question - yes, people would definitely pay for this service, but the pricing model would need to be reasonable. I think most people would be open to a "finder's fee" model where you pay a percentage of whatever's recovered. The industry standard seems to be around 10-15% of recovered funds. Anything higher feels excessive since the money already belongs to the person. Some states actually cap how much these services can charge - I believe California limits it to 10%.
Isn't there something kind of predatory about charging people to get access to their own money though? Especially when the information is technically available for free?
It's definitely a fine line. The information is free, but the convenience, time savings, and expertise in navigating the claims process is what people are paying for. I don't think it's predatory if: 1) The fee is reasonable, 2) There's transparency about the fact that people could do this themselves, and 3) The service adds genuine value beyond what someone could easily do on their own. Many people genuinely don't have the time or knowledge to track down funds across multiple states and properly file claims, so they're willing to pay for that assistance.
What most people don't realize is that unclaimed funds go way beyond forgotten bank accounts. I used to work for my state's treasury department, and we'd see unclaimed property from: - Insurance policy payouts - Utility deposits - Uncashed paychecks - Stock dividends - Tax refunds - Security deposits - Contents of safe deposit boxes A notification service would be valuable if it could actually identify ALL types of unclaimed assets. The biggest challenge is accurately matching people to their funds since the state databases often have limited identifying information.
That's a great point! Do these notification services actually check for all those different types of unclaimed assets? Or do they just focus on the easy stuff like bank accounts?
Isaac Wright
One option nobody's mentioned yet is splitting the difference. You could adjust your withholding to reduce it somewhat, but not eliminate the refund entirely. That way you still get more in your paychecks now, but you're also building in a safety margin in case your tax calculations aren't perfect. I do this every year - aim for a modest refund of $1,000-2,000 as insurance against unexpected tax issues, while keeping my regular withholding reasonable. The perfect withholding would theoretically result in $0 owed and $0 refund, but that's nearly impossible to achieve with changing circumstances throughout the year.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
ā¢How exactly do you calculate this "insurance amount"? I've tried to do this before but always end up way off, either getting much bigger refunds than I planned or owing a little.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
ā¢I use what I call the "10% buffer rule." I calculate what my ideal withholding should be for zero refund/zero amount due, then I add 10% extra to that amount as my safety margin. For example, if my calculated correct withholding is $1,000 per month, I'll actually withhold $1,100 per month. This typically results in a refund of about $1,200 at year end, which I'm comfortable with. It's small enough that I'm not giving a huge interest-free loan to the government, but large enough to absorb unexpected tax changes or calculation errors.
0 coins
Tami Morgan
Has anyone here actually applied an overpayment to the next year and then adjusted withholding to $0 for a quarter? My accountant warned me this could trigger an automated review because it looks unusual. Just wondering about real experiences.
0 coins
Rami Samuels
ā¢I've done this for the past three years with no issues. Applied about $8K of my refund to the next year's taxes each time, then adjusted my withholding way down for Q1 and part of Q2. Never triggered any special review or audit flags. The IRS systems treat it as a perfectly normal transaction because it is - it's a built-in option on the tax forms for a reason.
0 coins